ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOCX , 页数:8 ,大小:22.15KB ,
资源ID:6209174      下载积分:3 金币
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.bdocx.com/down/6209174.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(财务报表分析研究外文翻译.docx)为本站会员(b****5)主动上传,冰豆网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知冰豆网(发送邮件至service@bdocx.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

财务报表分析研究外文翻译.docx

1、财务报表分析研究外文翻译财务报表分析研究外文翻译题 目 双汇企业财务报表分析研究 姓 名 宋孟姣 专 业 2010级财务管理本科1班 学 号 201040016 指导教师 董玥玥 郑州科技学院工商管理学院 二一四年三月 FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF EVERAGE AND HOW IT INFORMS ABOUT PORABLIITY AND PRICE-TO-BOOK RATIOS 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF EVERAGE The following inimical statement analysis separ

2、ates the effects of enhancing liabilities and operating liabilities on the portability of shareholders equity. The analysis yields explicit leveraging equations from which the speci,cations for the empirical analysis are developed. Shareholder portability, return on common equity, is measured as Ret

3、urn on common equity (ROCE) = comprehensive net income ?common equity (1) Appropriate inimical statement analysis disentangles the effects of leverage. The analysis below, which elaborates on parts of Nazism and Penman (2001), begins by identifying components of the balance sheet and income statemen

4、t that involve operating and enhancing activities. The portability due to each activity is then calculated and two types of leverage are introduced to explain both operating and enhancing portability and overall shareholder portability. 1.1 Distinguishing the Portability of Operations from the Porta

5、bility of Financing Activities Common equity =operating assets,financial assets,operating liabilities,Financial liabilities (2) The distinction here between operating assets (like trade receivables, inventory and property, plant and equipment) and inimical assets (the deposits and marketable securit

6、ies that absorb excess cash) is made in other contexts. However, on the liability side, enhancing liabilities are also distinguished here from operating liabilities. Rather than treating all liabilities as enhancing debt, only liabilities that raise cash for operationslike bank loans, short-term com

7、mercial paper and bondsare classier as such. Other liabilitiessuch as accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue, restructuring liabilities and pension liabilitiesarise from operations. The distinction is not as simple as current versus long-term liabilities; pension liabilities, for examp

8、le, are usually long-term, and short-term borrowing is a current liability. Rearranging terms in equation (2), Common equity = (operating assets,operating liabilities),(financial liabilities,financial assets) Or Common equity = net operating assets,net financing debt (3) This equation regroups asset

9、s and liabilities into operating and enhancing activities. Net operating assets are operating assets less operating liabilities. So a arm might invest in inventories, but to the extent to which the suppliers of those inventories grant credit, the net investment in inventories is reduced. Firms pay w

10、ages, but to the extent to which the payment of wages is deferred in pension liabilities, the net investment required to run the business is reduced. Net enhancing debt is enhancing debt (including preferred stock) minus inimical assets. So, a arm may issue bonds to raise cash for operations but may

11、 also buy bonds with excess cash from operations. Its net indebtedness is its net position in bonds. Indeed a arm may be a net creditor (with more inimical assets than inimical liabilities) rather than a net debtor. The income statement can be reformulated to distinguish income that comes from opera

12、ting and enhancing activities: Comprehensive net income = operating income, net financing expense (4) Operating income is produced in operations and net inimical expense is incurred in the enhancing of operations. Interest income on inimical assets is netted against interest expense on inimical liab

13、ilities (including preferred dividends) in net inimical expense. If interest income is greater than interest expense, enhancing activities produce net inimical income rather than net inimical expense. Both operating income 3and net inimical expense (or income) is after tax. Equations (3) and (4) pro

14、duce clean measures of after-tax operating portability and the borrowing rate: Return on net operating assets (RNOA) = operating income ?net operating assets (5) And Net borrowing rate (NBR) = net financing expense ?net financing debt (6) RNOA recognizes that portability must be based on the net ass

15、ets invested in operations. So arms can increase their operating portability by convincing suppliers, in the course of business, to grant or extend credit terms; credit reduces the investment that shareholders would otherwise have to put in the business. Correspondingly, the net borrowing rate, by e

16、xcluding non-interest bearing liabilities from the denominator, gives the appropriate borrowing rate for the enhancing activities. Note that RNOA differs from the more common return on assets (ROA), usually denned as income before after-tax interest expense to total assets. ROA does not distinguish

17、operating and enhancing activities appropriately. Unlike ROA, RNOA excludes inimical assets in the denominator and subtracts operating liabilities. Nissan and Penman (2001) report a median ROA for NYSE and AMEX arms from 19631999 of only 6.8%, but a median RNOA of 10.0%much closer to what one would

18、expect as a return to business operations. 1.2 Financial Leverage and its Effect on Shareholder Portability From expressions (3) through (6), it is straightforward to demonstrate that ROCE is a weighted average of RNOA and the net borrowing rate, with weights derived from equation (3): ROCE= net ope

19、rating assets ?common equity RNOA,net financing debt? Common equity net borrowing rate (7) Additional algebra leads to the following leveraging equation: ROCE= RNOA,FLEV(RNOA,net borrowing rate) (8) Where FLEV, the measure of leverage from enhancing activities, is Financing leverage (FLEV) = net fin

20、ancing debt common equity (9) The FLEV measure excludes operating liabilities but includes (as a net against enhancing debt) inimical assets. If inimical assets are greater than inimical liabilities, FLEV is negative. The leveraging equation (8) works for negative FLEV (in which case the net borrowi

21、ng rate is the return on net inimical assets). This analysis breaks shareholder portability, ROCE, down into that which is due to operations and that which is due to enhancing. Financial leverage levers the ROCE over RNOA, with the leverage effect determined by the amount of inimical leverage (FLEV)

22、 and the spread between RNOA and the borrowing rate. The spread can be positive (favorable) or negative (unfavorable). 1.3 Operating Liability Leverage and its Effect on Operating Portability While enhancing debt levers ROCE, operating liabilities lever the portability of operations, RNOA. RNOA is o

23、perating income relative to net operating assets, and net operating assets are operating assets minus operating liabilities. So, the more operating liabilities a arm has relative to operating assets, the higher its RNOA, assuming no effect on operating income in the numerator. The intensity of the u

24、se of operating liabilities in the investment base is operating liability leverage: Operating liability leverage (OLLEV) =operating liabilities ?net operating assets (10) Using operating liabilities to lever the rate of return from operations may not come for free, however; there may be a numerator

25、effect on operating income. Suppliers provide what nominally may be interest-free credit, but presumably charge for that credit with higher prices for the goods and services supplied. This is the reason why operating liabilities are inextricably a part of operations rather than the enhancing of oper

26、ations. The amount that suppliers actually charge for this credit is difficult to identify. But the market borrowing rate is observable. The amount that suppliers would implicitly charge in prices for the credit at this borrowing rate can be estimated as a benchmark: Market interest on operating lia

27、bilities= operating liabilitiesmarket borrowing rate Where the market borrowing rate, given that most credit is short term, can be approximated by the after-tax short-term borrowing rate. This implicit cost is benchmark, for it is the cost that makes suppliers indifferent in supplying creed supplier

28、s are fully compensated if they charge implicit interest at the cost borrowing to supply the credit. Or, alternatively, the arm buying the goods or services is indifferent between trade credit and enhancing purchases at the borrowing rate. To analyze the effect of operating liability leverage on ope

29、rating portability, we dine: Return on operating assets (ROOA) =(operating income,market interest on operating liabilities)?operating assets (11) The numerator of ROOA adjusts operating income for the full implicit cost of trade credit. If suppliers fully charge the implicit cost of credit, ROOA is

30、the return of operating assets that would be earned had the arm no operating liability leverage. suppliers do not fully charge for the credit, ROOA measures the return fro operations that includes the favorable implicit credit terms from suppliers. Similar to the leveraging equation (8) for ROCE, RN

31、OA can be expressed as: RNOA= ROOA,OLLEV(ROOA,market borrowing rate) (12) Where the borrowing rate is the after-tax short-term interest rate. Given ROOA, the effect of leverage on portability is determined by the level of operating liability leverage and the spread between ROOA and the short-term af

32、ter-tax interest rate. Like enhancing leverage, the effect can be favorable or unfavorable: Firms can reduce their operating portability through operating liability leverage if their ROOA is less than the market borrowing rate. However, ROOA will also be affected if the implicit borrowing cost on operating liabilities is different from the market borrowing rate. 1.4 Total Leverage and its Effect on Shareholder Portability Operating liabilities and net enhancing debt combine into a total leverage measure: Total leverage (TLEV) = ( net finan

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1