SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx

1、SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of Resp on sesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers comments concerning ourmanuscript entitled “Paper Title” （ID: 文章稿号）.Those comments are all valuableand very helpful for revising and improving our pa

2、per, as well as the importantguidi ng sig nifica nee to our researches. We have studied comme nts carefully and havemade correcti on which we hope meet with approval. Revised porti on are marked inred in the paper. The main corections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer scomme nts are as f

3、low ing:Responds to the reviewer s comments:Reviewer #1:1.Response to comment:（简要列出意见 ）Respo nse:核 xxx2.Response to comment:（简要歹U出意见 ）Respo nse:核 xxx0 0 0 0 0 0逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：We are very sorry for our n eglige nee of We are very sorry for our in correct writ ingIt is really tr

4、ue as Reviewer suggested thatWe have made correct ion accord ing to the Reviewer s comme nts.We have re-written his part according to the Reviewer s suggestionAs Reviewer suggested that Considering the Reviewer s suggestion, we have 最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Special tha nks to you for your good comme nts.Rev

5、iewer #2:同上述Reviewer #3:xxxxxxOther cha nges:1.Li ne 60-61, the stateme nts of “ ” were corrected as2. Li ne 107, “”was added3. Li ne 129, “”was deletedxxxxxxWe tried our best to improve the manu script and made some cha nges in the manu script. These cha nges will not in flue nee the content and fr

6、amework of the paper. And here we did no t list the cha nges but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers warm work earnestly, and hope that the correct ion will meet with approval.Once aga in, tha nk you very much for your comme nts and suggesti ons以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复。与大家分享从中可以

7、看出，这位审稿人认真读了文章，提出很多宝贵的意见。这些意见分布在文章的各个地方。我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章。看到这些意见，我觉得很感激，不是因为接收文章的原因，而是这些意见能真正有助于提高 文章的质量。从中还看出，回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。对于回答问题，有的人就是一味反驳，却不加改进。记得ACS Style Guide里面说，当审稿人问到问题的，哪怕是他理解错误，这也说明作者这么写，其他读者也会理解错误，引起歧义。因此，作者就是要 修改句子，使表达不引起歧义。因此：有时间一味反驳，还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。Reviewers comme nts:Reviewer #3: While

8、 revis ing the script, it is to be suggested that author should clearly indicate the aim & scope of the study and while making conclusion, it is to be mentioned how the study is useful for the practical purposes. In addition the following are the few suggesti on s/comme nts, which may be in cluded w

9、hile revisio n.1. Introduction part first para last line, author must avoid to write ambiguous statement i.e., much work is still ahead, may indicate properly.2.Author could not dem on strate the reas on why, to select the orga nic compo und such as ethyl pyruvate for this study?3.Experimental part:

10、 It is difficult to understand the in-situ RAIRS experiments with homemade liquid-solid RAIRS cell. More detailed information may be useful for the others those who are working in the area. Photograph of the assembled cell may be in cluded.4.The descripti on give n for the experime ntal set up (page

11、 4) can be prese nted by flow diagram in stead, as an ease to un dersta nd the set up.5.Resluts Part (Page 6): CO adlayers with ide ntical mono layer coverages, the mono layer coverage, is it bee n performed with some adsorpti on model? Further, it was suggestedthat CO-saturatedPt surface, but not m

12、en tio ned about the saturati on experime nts. Is it obta ined after 60 min of CO bubbli ng?6.Page 12, 2nd para: The displaceme nt of EtPy by CCl4 flush in g, is it con firmed by the EtPy peaks? If so, it has to be mentioned clearly in the para. Also in the same para, author referred for Fig. 7a and

13、 7b but in the figures, it did nt appear, only figure 7 appeared. I feel it refers for figure 7, porti on A and B, to be corrected. Similarly, in the text referred the fig 2a, 2b. etc but on the figure sheet it is mentioned as 2A, 2B .etc. to be corrected.7.Page 14, 1st para: c on tam in ati on of t

14、he Pt surface by corrosi on of o-ri ngs in high concentration EtPy, but the statement has not been supported by other evide nce/literature.CO on the Pt surface (figs 3 & 4) has to be discussed more precisely. This reviewer is unable to follow the reason why they showed different reactivity, is it pr

15、incipally due to the organic moieties, or due to the impurities of commercially available chemicals or a mixed effect. It has to be clearly dem on strated,however, the only experime nt performed with CO/water? CCl4 would difficult to describe it in detail.9.The author try to restrain with repeated a

16、rguments in the text e.g., page 3 para1: It was gen eralized that , also appeared on page 21 first para.10.Captions of the figures are too long, the detailed description already given in the text, hence would not be in cluded here. Capti ons should be short and crispy.Dear Editor,I quite appreciate

17、your favorite consideration and the reviewer insightfulcomments. Now I have revised the JCIS-06-247 exactly according to the reviewer scomme nts, and found these comme nts are very helpful. I hope this revisio n can make my paper more acceptable. The revisi ons were addressed point by point below.ge

18、 neral The objective of this research was added at the begi nning of the third paragraph of In troduct ion. How the study is useful for practical purposes was added at the end of Con clusi on as one paragraph.1Ambiguous statement i.e., “ much work is still ahead ” was deleted.2Ethyl pyruvate was use

19、d here as a typical compound (containing two carb onyl groups) to dem on strate the feasibility of using our diag nosing tool to detect low-coverage CO (co ming from decarb ony latio n of EtPy) at the liquid-solid in terface. EtPy is a reacta nt used in liquid-phase chiral catalysis, and slight deco

20、mpositi on of EtPy to adsorbed CO was reported to in flue nee the catalytic performa nee. In additi on, by studying that, we can directly compare our results with previous studies. More details in the first paragraph of Section 3.2.3The IR cell was designed according to the IR cells used by many ele

21、ctrochemical workers. References were added. A photo was given in the Support ing In formati on.4A flow diagram of the experime ntal setup was give n in the new Fig. 1.5The CO adsorpti on experime nts were performed in the same adsorptio n mode, by bubbling CO through a clean Pt surface in different

22、 days to achieve the same saturation coverage of CO. Initial experiments indicated that given the CO bubbling rate was 0.85 cm3/mi n, CO can saturate on Pt after 30-45 min. We bubble CO for 60 min to guarantee the same CO coverage. If we bubble CO for more time, or if wein crease the CO flow ing rat

23、e several times, the CO saturati on coverage does n tcha nge, in dicati ng 60 min is already eno ugh. A figure show ing the CO uptake as afunction of bubbling time was given in the Supporting Information.6The displaceme nt of EtPy by CCI4 was con firmed by the rem oving of EtPypeaks. The men ti on o

24、f Fig. 7a and 7b etc. throughout the text were all corrected.7It is known that some solve nts such as acet one can corrode the Vit on o-ri ng.We saw the damage of o-ri ng after using high-c oncen trati on EtPy. A refere nee to theVito n o-ri ng in formatio n was give n.8The observed reactivity trend

25、 is due to a comb in ati on of both effects, with theaccumulati on of orga nic moieties on Pt surface duri ng nu merous flushi ng cycles themore importa nt reas on. A few proper senten ces were added to clarity this point.9The repeated arguments in the first paragraph in Section 4.3 were deleted.10T

26、he too-l ong capti ons were sig nifica ntly shorte ned.In all, I found the reviewer s comments are quite helpful, and I revised my paperpoin t-by-po int. Thank you and the review aga in for your help!结果:http:/dx.doi.org/10.1016/jjcis.2006.09.005欢迎浏览：Orga nic Chemistry on Solid Surfaces (Review)乙 Ma,

27、 F. Zaera*, Surface Sce nee Reports 61 (2006) 229-281.Scie nceDirect TOP25 Hottest Articles in Chemistryhttp:/dx.doi.org/10.10167j.surfrep.2006.03.001Cl修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of Resp on sesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers comments concerning o

28、ur manuscript entitled “Paper Title” （ID: 文章稿号）.Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guidi ng sig nifica nee to our researches. We have studied comme nts carefully and have made correcti on which we hope meet with approval. R

29、evised porti on are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer comme nts are as flow ing:Responds to the reviewer s comments:Reviewer #1:1.Response to comment:（简要列出意见 ）Respo nse:核 xxx2.Response to comment:（简要歹U出意见 ）Respo nse:核 xxx0 0 0 0 0 0逐条意见回答，

30、切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用:We are very sorry for our n eglige nee of We are very sorry for our in correct writi ng It is really true as Reviewer suggested that We have made correct ion accord ing to the Reviewer s comme nts.We have rewritten this part according to the Reviewer s suggestionAs Rev

31、iewer suggested that Considering the Reviewer s suggestion, we have 最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Special tha nks to you for your good comme nts.Reviewer #2:同上述Reviewer #3:xxxxxxOther cha nges:1. Li ne 60-61, the stateme nts of “ ” were corrected as2. Li ne 107, “”was added3. Li ne 129, “”was deletedxxxxxxWe tri

32、ed our best to improve the manu script and made some cha nges in themanu script. These cha nges will not in flue nee the content and framework of thepaper. And here we did no t list the cha nges but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers warm work earnestly, and hope that the correct ion will mee