中学生英语发言稿.docx

1、中学生英语发言稿 中学生英语发言稿 ladies teacher and classmate:good morning. i am three years. twenty class stadent. my name is jane wong. i would like to thank you teacher and classmate giving me this chance to have book review , as is well-known. childhood is curiosity and reading.now i would like to share learni

2、ng mate experience, to speak frankly, i like reading books about maths ,especially problem sdving ones .i can learn how to control your brain and master analysis and logic from math. during the process of counting and understanding the question you will meet a good friend. her name is patience in tr

3、uth, during the process of math, we not only manage our brains,we also operate our hands, we learn ways to use our brains and develop a pair of skillful hands.learning math has too many advantages, besides training our thinking and letting us know many friends. the most important thing is we will us

4、e the arithmetic all our lives, for example: counting the candy in our pockets, the score on examinations, even the speed dad drives the car. there are so many examples in our lives, lastly, i want to say thank you again for listening to my book review and i hope you will like math as much as i like

5、 it. thank you very much!各位老师和同学们:早安,我是三年20班的学生,我的名字叫王乙真,我很感谢老师和同班同学给我这个机会在这里做心得报告.大家都知道,小朋友是好奇和喜欢读书的嘛.今天我想跟大家分享我学习数学的心得.坦白说,我自己很喜欢阅读数学书籍, 尤其是解题数学的书.其实,在学数学的过程中,我将学会运用我的头脑去分析和组合数字,并在计算和理解题目的过程中,慢慢的认识了一个很好的朋友,它名字就叫做-耐心.事实上在学数学过程中,我们不只脑在动,手也必须配合口诀在动,我们渐渐学了如何应用聪明的小脑瓜和一双万能的双手.学习数学的好处实在太多了,除了训练思考之外,还可以认识

6、很多的小朋友.最重要的是我们一辈子都会应用到数字的运算,例如计算口袋里的糖果,考试的分数,甚至爸爸开车的速度等等,这实在可以举太多太多生活的例子了.最後,我再次谢谢大家听我做心得报告和希望大家都跟我一样喜欢数学.谢谢你们! spiro theodore agnew: television news coveragei think its obvious from the cameras here that i didnt come to discuss the ban on cyclamates or ddt. i have a subject which i think if of grea

7、t importance to the american people. tonight i want to discuss the importance of the television news medium to the american people. no nation depends more on the intelligent judgment of its citizens. no medium has a more profound influence over public opinion. nowhere in our system are there fewer c

8、hecks on vast power. so, nowhere should there be more conscientious responsibility exercised than by the news media. the question is, “are we demanding enough of our television news presentations?” “and are the men of this medium demanding enough of themselves?”monday night a week ago, president nix

9、on delivered the most important address of his administration, one of the most important of our decade. his subject was vietnam. my hope, as his at that time, was to rally the american people to see the conflict through to a lasting and just peace in the pacific. for 32 minutes, he reasoned with a n

10、ation that has suffered almost a third of a million casualties in the longest war in its history.when the president completed his address - an address, incidentally, that he spent weeks in the preparation of - his words and policies were subjected to instant analysis and querulous criticism. the aud

11、ience of 70 million americans gathered to hear the president of the united states was inherited by a small band of network commentators and self-appointed analysts, the majority of whom expressed in one way or another their hostility to what he had to say.it was obvious that their minds were made up

12、 in advance. those who recall the fumbling and groping that followed president johnsons dramatic disclosure of his intention not to seek another term have seen these men in a genuine state of nonpreparedness. this was not it.one commentator twice contradicted the presidents statement about the excha

13、nge of correspondence with ho chi minh. another challenged the presidents abilities as a politician. a third asserted that the president was following a pentagon line. others, by the expressions on their faces, the tone of their questions, and the sarcasm of their responses, made clear their sharp d

14、isapproval.to guarantee in advance that the presidents plea for national unity would be challenged, one network trotted out averell harriman for the occasion. throughout the presidents address, he waited in the wings. when the president concluded, mr. harriman recited perfectly. he attacked the thie

15、u government as unrepresentative; he criticized the presidents speech for various deficiencies; he twice issued a call to the senate foreign relations committee to debate vietnam once again; he stated his belief that the vietcong or north vietnamese did not really want military take-over of south vi

16、etnam; and he told a little anecdote about a very, very responsible fellow he had met in the north vietnamese delegation.all in all, mr. harrison offered a broad range of gratuitous advice challenging and contradicting the policies outlined by the president of the united states. where the president

17、had issued a call for unity, mr. harriman was encouraging the country not to listen to him.a word about mr. harriman. for 10 months he was americas chief negotiator at the paris peace talks - a period in which the united states swapped some of the greatest military concessions in the history of warf

18、are for an enemy agreement on the shape of the bargaining table. like coleridges ancient mariner, mr. harriman seems to be under some heavy compulsion to justify his failures to anyone who will listen. and the networks have shown themselves willing to give him all the air time he desires.now every a

19、merican has a right to disagree with the president of the united states and to express publicly that disagreement. but the president of the united states has a right to communicate directly with the people who elected him, and the people of this country have the right to make up their own minds and

20、form their own opinions about a presidential address without having a presidents words and thoughts characterized through the prejudices of hostile critics before they can even be digested.when winston churchill rallied public opinion to stay the course against hitlers germany, he didnt have to cont

21、end with a gaggle of commentators raising doubts about whether he was reading public opinion right, or whether britain had the stamina to see the war through. when president kennedy rallied the nation in the cuban missile crisis, his address to the people was not chewed over by a roundtable of criti

22、cs who disparaged the course of action hed asked america to follow.the purpose of my remarks tonight is to focus your attention on this little group of men who not only enjoy a right of instant rebuttal to every presidential address, but, more importantly, wield a free hand in selecting, presenting,

23、 and interpreting the great issues in our nation. first, lets define that power.at least 40 million americans every night, its estimated, watch the network news. seven million of them view a.b.c., the remainder being divided between n.b.c. and c.b.s. according to harris polls and other studies, for

24、millions of americans the networks are the sole source of national and world news. in will rogers observation, what you knew was what you read in the newspaper. today for growing millions of americans, its what they see and hear on their television sets.now how is this network news determined? a sma

25、ll group of men, numbering perhaps no more than a dozen anchormen, commentators, and executive producers, settle upon the 20 minutes or so of film and commentary thats to reach the public. this selection is made from the 90 to 180 minutes that may be available. their powers of choice are broad.they

26、decide what 40 to 50 million americans will learn of the days events in the nation and in the world. we cannot measure this power and influence by the traditional democratic standards, for these men can create national issues overnight. they can make or break by their coverage and commentary a morat

27、orium on the war. they can elevate men from obscurity to national prominence within a week. they can reward some politicians with national exposure and ignore others.for millions of americans the network reporter who covers a continuing issue - like the abm or civil rights - becomes, in effect, the

28、presiding judge in a national trial by jury.it must be recognized that the networks have made important contributions to the national knowledge - through news, documentaries, and specials. they have often used their power constructively and creatively to awaken the public conscience to critical prob

29、lems. the networks made hunger and black lung disease national issues overnight. the tv networks have done what no other medium could have done in terms of dramatizing the horrors of war. the networks have tackled our most difficult social problems with a directness and an immediacy thats the gift o

30、f their medium. they focus the nations attention on its environmental abuses - on pollution in the great lakes and the threatened ecology of the everglades. but it was also the networks that elevated stokely carmichael and george lincoln rockwell from obscurity to national prominence.nor is their po

31、wer confined to the substantive. a raised eyebrow, an inflection of the voice, a caustic remark dropped in the middle of a broadcast can raise doubts in a million minds about the veracity of a public official or the wisdom of a government policy. one federal communications commissioner considers the

32、 powers of the networks equal to that of local, state, and federal governments all combined. certainly it represents a concentration of power over american public opinion unknown in history.now what do americans know of the men who wield this power? of the men who produce and direct the network news

33、, the nation knows practically nothing. of the commentators, most americans know little other than that they reflect an urbane and assured presence seemingly well-informed on every important matter. we do know that to a man these commentators and producers live and work in the geographical and intellectual confines of washington, d.c., or n