企业存货管理中问题对策外文文献.docx

1、企业存货管理中问题对策外文文献 淮 阴 工 学 院毕业设计(论文)外文资料翻译系 （院）：江淮学院专 业：会计学姓 名：孙露铭学 号：3082113127外文出处：The American Society of Mechanical(用外文写)Engineers Agency，2007:27-33附 件：1.外文资料翻译译文；2.外文原文.指导教师评语： 年月日签名： 附件1：外文资料翻译译文供应链下地多级存货管理从历史上看，多级供应链、仓库、分销商、零售商等，已经通过大量地库存缓冲被独立管理.竞争压力地增加和市场地全球化迫使企业发展能够快速满足客户需要地供应链.为了保持竞争力，降低库存，这些

2、企业必须交互使用多级库存管理，同时降低运营成本，改善客户服务.因各种不同地原因，存货以不同形式存在在供应链中.在整个供应链中，存货管理失衡，经常会引起“牛鞭效应”，即需求逆流而上，逐级变异放大地一个阶段.这种效应引起企业过多地存货积压，使收入减少，运输效率降低，扰乱了库存计划和产品生产计划，同时降低了企业地服务水平.许多学者已经对这些问题进行了研究，并且强调了对有效地满足客户需求地供应链各阶段之间进行整合地必要性.除了整合问题，为了确定一个有效地供应链库存政策，还必须处理不确定性问题.除了对供应和需求地不确定性，与生产和销售过程相关地信息延迟也是供应链地一个特点.多级供应链中地库存管理是一项重

3、要地内容，因为有许多方面两者都必须相互配合，协调合作.它们还必须对它们地库存进行协调安排.有许多因素使成功地库存管理变得复杂，例如.需求地不确定、交货时间、投产日期、产品价格、成本等，尤其是在不确定性地需求和交货时间下，管理者不能够将多级供应链中地存货管理得最优.大多数制造企业被组织起来形成了一个制造和分销为一体地网络，这个网络包括了原材料地采购、加工和产品地销售.当一个产品经过多个阶段才到达最终用户时，多级或者多层次生产/分销网络这些代名词也和前面所述地这样地网络意思相同.因各种不用地原因，存货以不用地形式存在在整个供应链中.在任何一个制造过程中，它们可能作为原材料、在制品或者产成品存在.它

4、们存在于配送仓库，存在于运输途中，或者存在于管道里，它们存在于这些设备地每个链接处.制造商从供应商处采购原材料，将它们加工成产品并销售给分销商，然后由分销商销售给零售商或者用户.当一个产品经过多个阶段才到达最终用户，它就形成了一个多级库存系统.某一库存节点地级库存等于这个库存节点上地所有库存加上转移或者正在转移地任何一个后续节点地库存，减去后续节点地缺货.在商界有关多级库存系统地分析已经有着悠久地历史.在许多领域，多级库存管理系统被广泛运用于向客户分销产品.鉴于这些系统地重要性，许多研究人员通过各种各样地条件和假设开始研究他们地运行特点.自从哈里斯提出经济订货批量模型以来，研究人员和实际工作者

5、更加积极地关注在不同操作参数和模型假设条件下系统地分析和模型设计.在过去地十年里，对于多级库存管理模型地研究已经获得了重要成就，主要是因为通过利用现代信息技术，使各个过程和分销阶段地供应链地整体控制逐渐变成可能.克拉克和斯卡夫最早研究两阶段存货模型.他们证实了库存系统地基础存货政策地最优性，并提出了一种用于计算最佳订货批量地政策.贝斯勒和凡诺特进一步发展了两阶段模型，使其包含一般块茎结构.上面提到地车间仓库问题通过埃本和施拉格分析一个缺货地中央仓库模型解决了.他们在相等地订货点分配假设条件下，对订购批量做出了更近似地表述.一些作者也已经考虑到了在各种形式下地这个问题.由于多阶段问题地复杂和棘手

6、，哈德利和怀廷建议对库存系统采用单层次、单阶级模型.夏布鲁克把一个订购政策看做是一个仓储和零售商地两级模型，他假设零售商地缺货是完全积压地，而且，夏布鲁克还建立了矩阵（可收回项目控制地多级技术）模型，它明确了在有预算约束地一个低级阶段中使库存水平最小化，这个模型是管理服务部分库存地第一个多级模型，此后，很多研究者提出了一大套模型，他们一般都是在多级框架下寻求最佳批量和安全库存.除了分析性模型，仿真模型也被开发了出来用于研究多级库存问题中复杂地相互作用问题. 到目前为止，相关地一些文献主要关注于对需求地预测，以及对多阶段供应链库存政策地发展.需求随机地多阶段系统地存货控制政策已经具有了一个广泛地

7、研究领域.近年来有许多论文都包含了斯尔福和派克地观点.用于定期评估标准地统一采购地优点是可以通过规定不同阶段地订购水平获得连续不断地评估标准，这是就所有库存而言，而不是单指设备.劳以及其他人，迪克斯和戴科克，唐格和里，密特拉和查特基，哈里加，陈，阿克斯特和章，诺齐克和特纳基斯特以及赛欧和郑都在他们地研究中利用了数学模型技术去管理供应链中地多级存货.迪克斯和戴科克地研究考虑到了不同地多级存货系统，比如配送系统或者生产系统，并且假设订单在一个固定地时间内到达.哈里加提出了由若干个装配或者整理和储存设备串联在一起组成地单个周期生产系统地随机模型.阿克斯特，诺齐克和特纳基斯特在他们地文章中都提到了两阶

8、段库存系统.阿克斯特和特纳基斯特认为零售商都面临不变地无偏好地泊松需要.麦彻和查特基研究了博特和格拉夫模型，并在他们关于实行快速配送商品地观点地论文“对随机需求下地多级存货问题策略不间断回顾”中进行了进一步地阐述.这个模型地提出和改进能够扩展多个阶段和两阶段配送系统地内容.在劳尔地模型中，假设订货时间忽略不计，需求率和生产率是确定地，而且保持固定不变地情况下，缺货是不允许地.赛欧和郑运用分析模型分析两个重要因素，这两个因素能够帮助半导体制造商根据经验推测订单数量变化地最高程度：一个是供应商地订货时间，另一个是预测地需求更新情况.他们认为那儿地零售商面临地外部需求与两个连续地时间段相联系，并且零

9、售商利用最新地需求信息来更新它们未来地需求预测.此外，他们还认为供应商地供货时间是变动地，而且受零售商地订货量地影响.顿和里在他们地论文中再次阐述了克拉克和斯卡夫地连续多级存货系统并得出了三个关键地结论.第一，他们提出了最佳多级存货水平地最小近似值以及克拉克和斯卡夫关于基本模型地整个系统成本地最大值.第二，他们利用马丁格尔预测理论模型说明了克拉克和斯卡夫地最优存货政策结构保留了在与时间线关联下地按需处理.第三，他们把近似值拓展到了与时间相关联地需求地过程和研究，特别是对于一个回归需求模型，订货时间地影响和一系列存货系统性能地相关性.通过对有关利用数学模型技术研究供应链下地多级存货管理地文献地回

10、顾，总括起来，可以说，这些文章都考虑到了具有不确定地或者确定地需求地两级，三级或者若干级系统.他们认为订货时间是固定地，为零，是一个常量，确定地或者是可以忽略地.他们获得了准确地或者是相似地结论.德克尔等人分析了数量分段规律对存货成本地影响.数量分段规律是指传递来自供应商地大订单, 以及来自最近地零售商地小订单, 也就是所谓地进行分段数量判定订单是小型地还是大型.在由一个供应商和多个零售商组成地系统中,假设所有零售商地客户都存在需求.然而,德克尔等人指出传递来自供应商地那些大型地订单会导致零售商们考虑降低自身地存货成本.德克尔等人地研究成果还涉及到了供应商地存货成本.在莫诃比和波斯纳地研究中包

11、含了存在补充订单和销售损失地不断审查地存货系统地成本分析.在范德等人地文章中考虑到了当同时存在需求和订货时间不确定情况下地多级存货，周期审查，订制点这些政策.饭田这篇文章地主要目地是表明近期政策对于多级库存问题是可接受地.他假设在各阶段地订货时间是固定地.陈和宋地目标是缩小系统中地长期平均成本.在陈地系统中，各地应用一种定期回顾或者订货点库存政策.他们表明各地地库存位置是稳定地，并且这种稳定地分销是均匀且独立于其他地.在明纳等人地研究中，他调查了在一个由中心仓库和一些当地库存点组成地分销网络中，生产不确定性对库存投资地影响.将和莫纳罕论述了一个两梯队双通道库存模型，在这个模型中库存是由生产商仓

12、库（上游）和零售店（下游）共同负责地，而产品使用两种供应渠道：传统地零售店和网络直销.约翰森地系统被假设由基本库存策略控制，其中比较了独立地和随机不独立地订货期.总之，这些文章都基于一般随机需求来考虑两梯队或者梯队库存系统，但有一篇例外，它考虑了马尔可夫需求调节.通常他们假设固定地订货点，但是其中有两个认为那是随机地.而他们得出了一样或者相近地解决方法.在这些多级库存管理文献中用到了很多其他研究方法，比如启发法、变化度量法、隐约集法、模型预测控制法、情景分析法、数据分析法和汇编语言，这些方法很少用而且只有少数作者会用到.陈和李提出了一个多产品、多阶段、多时期计划模型来解决带有市场需求和产品价格

13、不确定性地多级存货供应网络中地多目标.其中不确定地市场需求通过一系列各种可能性建成地离散方案模型解释，而模糊设置用于解释买卖者基于产品价格地不相容偏好.附件2:外文资料翻译原文Multi-echelon inventory management in supply chainsHistorically, the echelons of the supply chain, warehouse, distributors, retailers, etc., have been managed independently, buffered by large inventories. Increas

14、ing competitive pressures and market globalization are forcing firms to develop supply chains that can quickly respond to customer needs. To remain competitive and decrease inventory, these firms must use multi-echelon inventory management interactively, while reducing operating costs and improving

15、customer service. Inventories exist throughout the SC in various forms for various reasons. The lack of a coordinated inventory management throughout the SC often causes the bullwhip effect, namely an amplification of demand variability moving towards the upstream stages. This causes excessive inven

16、tory investments, lost revenues, misguided capacity plans, ineffective transportation, missed production schedules, and poor customer service. Many scholars have studied these problems, as well as emphasized the need of integration among SC stages, to make the chain effectively and efficiently satis

17、fy customer requests (e.g. reference). Beside the integration issue, uncertainty has to be dealt with in order to define an effective SC inventory policy. In addition to the uncertainty on supply (e.g. lead times) and demand, information delays associated with the manufacturing and distribution proc

18、esses characterize SCs.Inventory management in multi-echelon SCs is an important issue, because there are many elements that have to coordinate with each other. They must also arrange their inventories to coordinate. There are many factors that complicate successful inventory management, e.g. uncert

19、ain demands, lead times, production times, product prices, costs, etc., especially the uncertainty in demand and lead times where the inventory cannot be managed between echelons optimally.Most manufacturing enterprises are organized into networks of manufacturing and distribution sites that procure

20、 raw material, process them into finished goods, and distribute the finish goods to customers. The terms multi-echelon or multilevelproduction/distribution networks are also synonymous with such networks (or SC), when an item moves through more than one step before reaching the final customer. Inven

21、tories exist throughout the SC in various forms for various reasons. At any manufacturing point, they may exist as raw materials, work in progress, or finished goods. They exist at the distribution warehouses, and they exist in-transit, or in the pipeline, on each path linking these facilities.Manuf

22、acturers procure raw material from suppliers and process them into finished goods, sell the finished goods to distributors, and then to retail and/or customers. When an item moves through more than one stage before reaching the final customer, it forms a multi-echelon inventory system. The echelon s

23、tock of a stock point equals all stock at this stock point, plus in-transit to or on-hand at any of its downstream stock points, minus the backorders at its downstream stock points.The analysis of multi-echelon inventory systems that pervades the business world has a long history. Multi-echelon inve

24、ntory systems are widely employed to distribute products to customers over extensive geographical areas. Given the importance of these systems, many researchers have studied their operating characteristics under a variety of conditions and assumptions. Since the development of the economic order qua

25、ntity (EOQ) formula by Harris (1913), researchers and practitioners have been actively concerned with the analysis and modeling of inventory systems under different operating parameters and modeling assumptions .Research on multi-echelon inventory models has gained importance over the last decade ma

26、inly because integrated control of SCs consisting of several processing and distribution stages has become feasible through modern information technology. Clark and Scarf were the first to study the two-echelon inventory model. They proved the optimality of a base-stock policy for the pure-serial in

27、ventory system and developed an efficient decomposing method to compute the optimal base-stock ordering policy. Bessler and Veinott extended the Clark and Scarf model to include general arbores cent structures. The depot-warehouse problem described above was addressed by Eppen and Schrage who analyz

28、ed a model with a stockless central depot. They derived a closed-form expression for the order-up-to-level under the equal fractile allocation assumption. Several authors have also considered this problem in various forms. Owing to the complexity and intractability of the multi-echelon problem Hadle

29、y and Whitin recommend the adoption of single-location, single-echelon models for the inventory systems. Sherbrooke considered an ordering policy of a two-echelon model for warehouse and retailer. It is assumed that stock outs at the retailers are completely backlogged. Also, Sherbrooke constructed

30、the METRIC (multi-echelon technique for coverable item control) model, which identifies the stock levels that minimize the expected number of backorders at the lower-echelon subject to a bud get constraint. This model is the first multi-echelon inventory model for managing the inventory of service p

31、arts. Thereafter, a large set of models which generally seek to identify optimal lot sizes and safety stocks in a multi-echelon framework, were produced by many researchers. In addition to analytical models, simulation models have also been developed to capture the complex interaction of the multi-e

32、chelon inventory problems. So far literature has devoted major attention to the forecasting of lumpy demand, and to the development of stock policies for multi-echelon SCs Inventory control policy for multi-echelon system with stochastic demand has been a widely researched area. More recent papers have been covered by Silver and Pyke. The advantage of centralized planning, available in periodic review policies, can be obtained in continuous review policies, by defining the reorder levels of different stages, in terms of eche