ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOCX , 页数:25 ,大小:42.06KB ,
资源ID:2478626      下载积分:3 金币
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.bdocx.com/down/2478626.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(北美范文argument模版工具箱.docx)为本站会员(b****1)主动上传,冰豆网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知冰豆网(发送邮件至service@bdocx.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

北美范文argument模版工具箱.docx

1、北美范文argument模版工具箱北美范文argument模版工具箱在准备argment的过程中,将北美范文中的攻击套路大概分了14类:1)调查问题,2)错误因果,3)差异概念,4)过去推将来,5)错误类比6)整体规律用于个体,7)单个事例说明整体,8)没有考虑其他影响因素,9)盈利问题,10)非充要条件,11)非此即彼,12)比例与总量混淆,13)对比实验问题,14)其他。并且将各类问题的段落进行了归纳和整理,下面就与大家共同分享这部分工作,希望能够对10G的兄弟姐妹有所帮助。(段落前面的序号是段落所在题目的通用题号)一. 调查问题11.The mayorprovides no eviden

2、ce that the surveys respondents are representative of the overallgroup of people whose. 被调查者的代表性Lacking such evidence, it is entirely possible that people inclined to . were more willing to respond to the surveythan other people were. In short, without better evidence that the survey is statisticall

3、y reliable调查的统计是可靠的 the mayor cannot rely on itto draw any firm conclusions about.28. The number of participants, 100, might constitute an insufficiently small sample to draw any reliable conclusions about.Also, the sample might be unrepresentative of district studnets as a group.142.The author prov

4、ides no evidence that the studys results arestatistically reliable. In order to establish a strong correlation between dietary iron and heart diseases, the studys sample must be sufficient in size样本大小 and representative of the overall population of样本代表性 heart-disease victims.Lacking evidence of a su

5、fficiently representative sample, theauthor cannot justifiably rely on the study to draw any conclusion whatsoever.144.The authors conclusions about.depend on theassumption that the poll results arestatistically reliable. Yet, the author offers no evidence to substantiate thisassumption.The author m

6、ust show that . polled constitute a sufficiently large sample of .样本大小, andthis sample is representative of all such .代表性Otherwise, the author cannotconfidently draw any general conclusions about.158.The Council has not convinced me that . in the survey arerepresentative of .in terms of .It is entir

7、ely possible that.The 300 people in the study are not necessarilyrepresentative of the states general populationin terms of . For example, perhaps.Or perhaps. In short, lacking evidence that. theCouncil cannot convince me that.174.The memo provides no evidence that theresults of either of the two su

8、rveys are statistically reliable.Besides, the memo provides no information about what percentageof . responded to the surveys参加调查的人数比例,也是样本大小; the lower thepercentages, the less reliable the results of the surveys.181.A final problem with the argument involvesthe two studies themselves. The letter p

9、rovides no information about howeither study was conducted调查是如何进行的.Without konwing whether the sample of . was representative of代表性the overall . population ., it is impossible toconfidently apply the studies results to that population.Moreover, we are not informed about the size of thesample样本大小in e

10、ither study; the smaller the sample, the less reliable the studysconclusion.186.A threshold problem with the argumentinvolves the statistical reliabilityof the survey.The director provides no evidence thatthe number of respondents is statistically significant 样本大小or that the respondentswere represen

11、tative of . in general代表性.Lacking information aboutthe randomness and size of the surveys sample,the director cannot make a convincing argument based on that survey.Even if the surveys respondents are representative of theentire population of ., the argument relies on the assumption that the respons

12、es themselves are reliable被调查者的可信性.Yet the director ignores the possiblilitythat.Lacking evidence that the respondents reports were bothtruthful and meaningful, the director cannotconfidently draw any conclusions about .from them.188.One problem with the argument is that since the studyinvolved only

13、 48 people it is impossible to confidently draw any conclusions aboutthe general population from it.201.The survey must be shown to be reliablebefore I can accept any conclusions based upon it. Specifically, the responses must beaccurate, and therespondents must be statistically significantin number

14、 and representative of the overall 样本大小和代表性. interms of .Without evidence of the surveysreliablity, it is impossible to draw any firm conclucions about . based onthe survey.220.The articles author has not shown the study upon which theargument denpends to be statistically reliable.The people studied

15、 must be representativeof the overall population of people who.; otherwise the author cannot drawany firm conclusions about . based on the studys results.221.The survey that the argument cites ispotentially problematic in three respects.First, we are not informed whether the surveysrespondents were representative of the overall population of . The smaller thesample, the greater the possiblity for biased results, and the less reliablethe survey.Second, . ; yet it is entirely possiblethat.Third, we are not informed that .;however, if. , then the

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1