届奉贤区高考英语二模.docx

1、届奉贤区高考英语二模状元考前提醒拿到试卷：熟悉试卷刚拿到试卷一般心情比较紧张，建议拿到卷子以后看看考卷一共几页，有多少道题，了解试卷结构，通览全卷是克服“前面难题做不出，后面易题没时间做”的有效措施，也从根本上防止了“漏做题”。答题策略答题策略一共有三点：1. 先易后难、先熟后生。先做简单的、熟悉的题，再做综合题、难题。2. 先小后大。先做容易拿分的小题，再做耗时又复杂的大题。3. 先局部后整体。把疑难问题划分成一系列的步骤，一步一步的解决，每解决一步就能得到一步的分数。立足中下题目，力争高水平考试时，因为时间和个别题目的难度，多数学生很难做完、做对全部题目，所以在答卷中要立足中下题目。中下题

2、目通常占全卷的80%以上，是试题的主要构成，学生能拿下这些题目，实际上就是有了胜利在握的心理，对攻克高档题会更放得开。确保运算正确，立足一次性成功在答卷时，要在以快为上的前提下，稳扎稳打，步步准确，尽量一次性成功。不能为追求速度而丢掉准确度，甚至丢掉重要的得分步骤。试题做完后要认真做好解后检查，看是否有空题，答卷是否准确，格式是否规范。要学会“挤”分考试试题大多分步给分，所以理科要把主要方程式和计算结果写在显要位置，文科尽量把要点写清晰，作文尤其要注意开头和结尾。考试时，每一道题都认真思考，能做几步就做几步，对于考生来说就是能做几分是几分，这是考试中最好的策略。检查后的涂改方式要讲究发现错误后

3、要划掉重新写，忌原地用涂黑的方式改，这会使阅卷老师看不清。如果对现有的题解不满意想重新写，要先写出正确的，再划去错误的。有的同学先把原来写的题解涂抹了，写新题解的时间又不够，本来可能得的分数被自己涂掉了。考试期间遇到这些事，莫慌乱！2018学年奉贤区调研测试 高三英语试卷（2019.04）. Grammar and VocabularySection ADirections：After reading the passage below, fill in the blanks to make the passage coherent and grammatically correct. For

4、 the blanks with a given word, fill in each blank with the proper form of the given word; for the other blanks, use one word that best fits each blank.How to Make the Most of Your Lunch HourShould you grab a bite at your desk or eat with your colleagues? That depends on whats on your agenda for the

5、rest of the day.Lunch hours _21_（get）shorter and shorter and even disappearing in some parts of todays working world. With fewer employees _22_（ask）to accomplish more in a day, many Americans treat lunch not as a break but as just another task to squeeze into an already over-booked day.But do quick

6、meals at the desk actually improve productivity over more leisurely meals?The researchers only studied 32 employees, so the findings are datable. But when they assigned one group to eat at their desks and another to dine with a colleague at a restaurant, they found those who ate lunch together showe

7、d a decline _23_ their performance on tests that measured concentration, memory and the ability to catch errors and read emotions in facial expressions following lunch than before lunch. Both groups ate the same meals, but those who ate alone were only given 20 minutes to consume their food, _24_ th

8、e paired participants were allowed one hour in the restaurant. Those who ate alone did not have as large a drop in their cognitive processing as those who ate in the restaurant.What was responsible for the change? There were too many variables at play to determine which had the strongest influence o

9、n cognitive controlwas it the companionship, or was it the restaurant environment _25_ other diners were present, music was played and the meal was served by wait staff, or was it the longer time to enjoy the meal?_26_ factor was responsible, the group that took a restaurant lunch break came back mo

10、re relaxed, say the authors, and that likely affected their cognitive sharpness. Sharing a meal outside the office with a friend appears to have a _27_（calm）effect, and while it reduces intellectual skills, it may develop social harmony and teamwork, which _28_ be an important feature of some work t

11、asks.But dont feel sorry for the lone lunchers. It turns out _29_ since they were able to maintain their cognitive skills following the meal, they might be in a better position _30_（think）creatively for projects that require more innovative solutions or approaches.Section BDirections：Fill in each bl

12、ank with a proper word chosen from the box. Each word can only be used once. Note that there is one word more than you need.A. involving B. distinguish C. adapted D. tailored E. mediumF. gains G. partially H. amazing I. definitely J. steer K. implicationsGenes That Make You SmarterThe contributions

13、genes make to intelligence increase as children grow older. This goes against the idea most people hold that as we age, environmental influences gradually overpower the genetic legacy（遗产）we are born with and may have _31_ for education. “People assume the genetic influence goes down with age because

14、 the environmental differences between people pile up in life,”says Robert Plomin.“What we found was quite _32_ and goes in the other direction.”Previous studies have shown variations in intelligence are _33_ due to genetics. To find out whether this genetic contribution varies with age, Plomins tea

15、m gathered data from six separate studies carried out in 4 countries, _34_ a total of 11000 pairs of twins. The researchers tested twins on reasoning, arithmetic etc, to measure a quantity called “G”. Each study also included both identical twins, with the same genes, and Lateral twins（异卵双生）, sharin

16、g about half their genes, making it possible to _35_ the contributions of genes and environment to their G scores. Plomins team calculated that in childhood, genes account for about 41 percent of the variation in intelligence. In adolescence, this rose to 55 percent; by young adolescence, it was 66

17、percent. No one _36_ knows why the influence from genes should increase with age, but Plomin suggests that as children get older, they become better at handing their environment to suit their genetic needs, and says “Kids with high G will use their environment to develop their cognitive ability and

18、choose friends who are like-minded. ” Children with _37_ to low G may choose less challenging pastimes and activities, further emphasizing their genetic legacy.Is there any way to interfere with the pattern? Perhaps. “The evidence of strong heritability（遗传可能性）doesnt mean at all that there is nothing

19、 you can do about it,”says Susanne Jaeggi, “from our own work, the ones that started off with lower IQ scores had higher _38_ after training.”Plomin suggests that genetic differences may be more emphasized if all children share an identical curriculum instead of it being _39_ to childrens natural ab

20、ilities. “My tendency would be to give everyone a good education, but put more effort into the lower end,” he says. Intelligence researchers Paul Thompson agrees: “It shows that educators need to _40_ kids towards things drawing out their natural talents.”. Reading Comprehension.Section ADirections：

21、For each blank in the following passages there are four words or phrases marked A, B, C, and D. Fill in each blank with the word or phrase that best fits the context. Open data-sharers are still in the minority in many fields. Although many researchers broadly agree that public access to raw data wo

22、uld promote science, most are _41_ to post the results of their own labours online.Some communities have agreed to share online-geneticists, for example, post DNA sequences at the GenBank repository（库）, and astronomers are accustomed to _42_ images of galaxies and stars from, say, the Sloan Digital

23、Sky Survey, a telescope that has observed some 500 million objects - but these remain the _43_, not the rule Historically, scientists have _44_ sharing for many reasons: it is a lot of work; until recently, good databases did not exist; grant funders were not pushing for sharing; it has been difficu

24、lt to agree on standards for formatting data; and thereis no agreed way to assign credit for data.But the _45_ are disappearing in part because journals and funding agencies worldwide are encouraging scientists to make their data _46_. Last year, the Royal Society in London said in its report that s

25、cientists need to“_47_ a research culture where data is viewed as private preserve”. Funding agencies note that data paid for with public money should be public information, and the scientific community is recognizing that data can now be shared online in ways that were not possible before. To match

26、 the growing demand, services are springing up to make it easier to publish research products _48_ and enable other researchers to discover and cite（引用） them.Although calls to share data often concentrate on the _49_ advantages of sharing, the practice is not purely beneficial to others. Researchers

27、 who share get plenty of personal benefits, including more connections with colleagues, improved _50_ and increased citations. The most successful sharers - those whose data are downloaded and cited the most often - get noticed, and their work gets used. _51_, one of the most popular data sets on mu

28、ltidisciplinary repository Dryad is about wood density around the world; it has been _52_ 5,700 times. Co-author Amy Zanne thinks that users probably range from climate-change researchers wanting to estimate how much carbon is stored in biomass, to foresters looking for information on different grad

29、es of trees.“Id much prefer to have my data used by the _53_ number of people to ask their own questions,”she says.“Its important to allow readers and reviewers to see exactly how you arrive at your results. Publishing data and code allows your science to be _54_.”Even people whose data are less pop

30、ular can benefit. By making the effort to organize and label files so others can understand them, scientists can become more organized and better disciplined themselves, thus avoiding _55_ later on.41. A. restricted B. reluctant C. desperate D. generous42. A. accessing B. processing C. analyzing D.

31、identifying43. A. assumption B. mystery C. exception D. phenomenon44. A. longed for B. appealed to C. focused on D. objected to45. A. symptoms B. barriers C. advantages D. consequences46. A. controllable B. unique C. reliable D. public47. A. shift away from B. end up with C. give rise to D. build up

32、48. A. secretly B. digitally C. ethically D. fairly49. A. material B. individual C. moral D. economic50. A. visibility B. awareness C. condition D. confidence51. A. On the contrary B. As a result C. For example D. After all52. A. downloaded B. updated C. optimized D. addressed53. A. moderate B. maximum C. average D. estimated54. A. r