雅思写作高分范文国际类5篇Word格式文档下载.docx

1、response. Admittedly, some arguments could be explored to justify that developing countries ought to be offered financial support. To begin with, help based on financial donation could benefit the poverty-stricken nations directly. To be more specific, aid that serves to finance the core inputs to d

2、evelopment, such as teachers, health centers, roads, wells, and medicine, could accelerate the development of the straitened countries and thus the living standards could be enhanced. In addition, those financial beneficence could help developing countries strengthen their business environment, incr

3、ease the access to international markets, and create more job opportunities. Nevertheless, the potential drawbacks of economic assistance could not be ignored. Because of information asymmetries, international organizations often encounter difficulties in terms of the appropriate allocation of finan

4、cial resources. Moreover, direct donation could create dependency and corruption. In cases where the money obtained is badly spent, human suffering would increase. Apart from financial support, other forms of foreign aid will also give a big push to break the low-income poverty trap that poorer coun

5、tries are trapped in. Opening up trade barriers, for example, is an alternative way to enable undeveloped countries to export their goods and products. Further, high-quality and experienced teaching staff and medical workers could be dispatched to the impoverished ones to offer educational and medic

6、al assistance. In conclusion, international assistance, be it financially or in other forms, could offer developing countries relief. However, given that different countries face different obstacles, international organizations should take the actual national conditions into account when deciding wh

7、ich forms of assistance to offer. 2. Some people believe that rich countries should provide poor countries with other types of help rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?There are many ways that wealthy countries could help impoverished ones. Some people argue that provi

8、ding financial aid is the best way, however, I think many other forms of assistance could be explored to make poor nations become better off. It is undeniable that financial assistance could benefit poverty-stricken nations to some extent. The obvious benefit of this kind of aid is to support poor c

9、ountries in implementing large projects. Without sufficient funds, poor countries cannot build infrastructures, schools, hospitals, and roads. In desperately poor nations that have the worst economic situations, donations could be used directly to buy clothes, food, and drinks to meet peoples basic

10、need. In addition, governments of developed counties could invest the received funds to create more job opportunities for their citizens.Once employed, peoples living standard can increase subsequently. Nevertheless, some people claim that offering financial assistance is only a short-term solution

11、and can cause numerous problems. One potential risk is that underprivileged countries might become too reliant on well-to-do ones and continue to demand more and more from the rest of the world to survive. Moreover, corruption is likely to occur when donations goes to the wealthy people of poor nati

12、ons who do not care about the living quality of the general public. Apart from offering economic aids, governments of developed counties could go for several other types of assistance. Firstly, other than money they can donate food, clothing, toiletry items, furniture, toys and books to the less wel

13、l-off nations. In this case, corruption could be decreased or even eliminated. Secondly, volunteer teachers and doctors with professional skills could be dispatched to poor nations to improve the education and medical care systems. To summarize, developed countries could give aid to poor nations in

14、many forms. However, effectiveness of these aid varies depending on the specific condition of each nation. 3. Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?In modern society, problems that people encounter are to such an extent

15、 that they need cooperation at local as well as international level. Some people claim that international attention is required to solve the urgent problems, such as environmental protection, the relief of natural disasters, and pollution. It is undeniable that numerous issues have reached a global

16、level and only through global cooperation can these issues be solved. For example, in the management of global warming risks, a series of international conferences have been held over the past few decades in an attempt to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gas, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and o

17、zone. Governments of top emitting countries, in particular, need to establish both national and regional targets to reduce emissions, promote energy efficiency, and support for renewable energy like solar energy. International cooperation also plays a vital role in relieving survivors of natural dis

18、asters and wars. The joint efforts of well-to-do countries worldwide could help with the serious food crisis to a large extent. Nevertheless, it is by no means to say that we should leave global cooperation to solve all problems that we are facing now. There are urgent problems that can be addressed

19、 at local level. For instance, poverty and associated issues such as educational underachievement, homelessness, and trafficking that are faced by some countries must be tackled by their own people. In cases where governments of impoverished nations embezzle donations and engage in corrupt practices

20、, there will be little left for their suffering citizens. Thus, these problems cannot be solved fundamentally without the independent development and reform of each individual country. In conclusion, given that international cooperation is necessary to deal with certain problems, the level of activi

21、ty and engagement of countries will directly impact the effectiveness of problem solving. However, there are also numerous problems that require the domestic resolution and action. 4. Some people believe famous peoples support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems,

22、while others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. International aid organizations have proved to be an efficient way in dealing with a number of problems that we are facing today. In recent years, an increasing number of celebrities get

23、involved in the campaigns organized by international aid organizations, while some critics claim that this kind of involvement makes these problems less important. In my opinion, famous people can certainly be effective. Admittedly, a small part of famous peoples participation and performance could

24、bring about negative effects. To begin with, the assistance given by top stars is limited and not practical since they can only outwardly offer support to international organizations. For example, they might simply give speech, which is way less important in terms of resolving some international pro

25、blems such as helping the population of poverty-stricken countries shake off poverty or tackling global environmental contamination. In addition, given that celebrities work can be extremely busy and their sources of income are not stable, they may fail to practice what they preach. As a result, the

26、 public are likely to lose confidence in the organizations that these stars publicized. Nevertheless, I am convinced that the advantages of involving stars outweigh the above mentioned disadvantages. Evidently, notable people, as the attention-attracting group, hold the responsibilities to pass on a

27、ctive influence. It is widely agreed that iconic figures could invoke broader recognition of big issues and their speeches as well as behaviors could set a fine learning example. For example, the warm-hearted help and generous donation provided by super stars can help those unfortunate and impoveris

28、hed countries to get big relief from suffering. Moreover, the reputation and credibility of these international aid groups could be enhanced under the impact of celebrities. Consequently, more and more people will take part in activities in an attempt to help those underprivileged nations and citize

29、ns. In conclusion, despite of the potential risks, the charitable assistance from celebrities can benefit the needy. 5. Many countries believe that international tourism has harmful effects. Why do they think so? What can be done to change their views?In recent years, international tourism has become a