新GREissue作文范例Word下载.docx

1、 The speaker alleges that the development of science technology will be harmful to human beings. I find this allegation to be specious. It ignores that the advantage of technology. I concede that the comfort and conveniences of modern life cause humans to give up some problems to technology, however

2、, technology offers humans more power to imagine and new fields or arts still require independent individuals. Admittedly, humans might lose a part of the ability to think for themselves when the comfort and convenience of modern life prevent people from developing into strong and independent. Espec

3、ially after the appearance of internet, nowadays, many people have formed the habit of seeking the solution on the internet without no experience of individual thought when they get in trouble. After all, internet has been developed to involve all fields of knowledge. On the other hand, sometimes pe

4、ople want to do some researches, they can find the example or direction on the internet. Therefore, following the direction or example to finish the task is so easy that they dont need to think or create new ones. However, when dealing with unprecedented issues or creating works of art, humans have

5、to rely on themselves. When people discover a new field, technology can not help them. Because all of technology are created to solve the problems in the fields that have been founded. At the early 20th century, Henry Ford created automobile to solve the problems of traffic and transportation by thi

6、nking by himself. The fact proved that it is a significant invention. On the other hand, art is formed by creating. For example, when J. K. Rowling created the great fantasy novels named Harry Potter, she did not have examples to imitate because the story of the books is unique. In 2001, Harry Potte

7、r and the Sorcerers Stone exceeded $93 million in North American revenues on its three-day opening weekend. Without no doubt, she is a successful and creative writer. Finally, the achievement of science technology provides a large number of methods of learning and traveling, which give people more o

8、pportunities to visit many places and acquire much information. Now when people want to design a bridge or a dam, they can use the computer to make a model to consider all the factors of it such as environment, cost and so on. Some computer aid design tools can let people design anything they want.

9、In sum, the discussion about whether the ability of humans to think for themselves will deteriorate or not will be continued. If only we can use it by the proper way, we can benefit from it and prevent from its malady.issue7The speaker alleges that government should fund arts so that the arts can fl

10、ourish and be available to all people and the others thinks the integrity of the arts may be threatened by the government funding of the arts. I fundamentally agree with the former. I concede that because of the limit of the government funding and the difference of leaders individual hobbies so that

11、 not all kinds of arts can acquire the same chance to develop. However, all the countries governments funding the development of the arts has become the fact. After all, governments have the ability to support the arts far more than individuals. Admittedly, government funding might directly or indir

12、ectly influence artists decisions and choices. For one thing, governments have the responsibility to improve the well-being of their citizens so that they may not have the enough money to fund all kinds of arts. Thus, some arts that has no ability to develop by themselves may be disappeared because

13、it is not funded by governments, even though it has its value to human beings. For another thing, leaders have their own hobbies so that their favorite art can flourish. But it is unfair to the other kinds of arts, especially some of them may be the citizens favorite. However, we cannot ignore the c

14、ontribution that governments make for the prosperity of arts. After all, compared with individual, they have the financial ability to fund the arts. So they can provide the possibility to develop for arts on the material aspect. At the same time, because of the financial support of governments, some

15、 art instruments can be used much broadly by the citizens. For instance, Chinese government decided to open all the national museums to their people for free. Therefore, this decision can make more people to realize and learn arts. It is good for the development of arts. Besides, governments can als

16、o offer the legal system and policies to assure the equal environment to all kinds of arts. From what has been discussed above, we could safely draw the conclusion that government funding of the arts has become the facts to all countries governments. And most of them have the good effect on arts. If

17、 only we can take correct measures, people and arts can benefit more from governments and outweigh its potential defect.issue8The speaker alleges that the people in power should step down five years in any field such as business, politics, education, government because revitalization through new lea

18、dership is the surest path to success for any enterprise. I fundamentally agree with the statement. I concede that something right may be changed after a period of time and different people have different ideas to make some innovations. However, in some fields long-term of leadership can bring stabi

19、lity and tradition for employees. First of all, a new leadership usually has greater initiative and would bring in new ideas. After all, people who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without constraints of established habits and attitudes. For instance, Mark Zuckerberg, the founder

20、 of Facebook is the youngest billionaire in the world. His company enjoys 500 million members in 207 countries. Compared with those chairmen of most of IT companies, he is the youngest leader of his company. Furthermore, when leaders have no fear of losing their power, they tend to abuse their power

21、. And every generation needs to redefine right and wrong in its own terms and according to the conditions of its own time. Dictatorship holds the best example for us. The famous monocrat Adolf Hitler brought a terrible disaster for human-beings. He triggered World War II and made a large number of H

22、olocaust events. However, in certain realms such as business it might not be so necessary to limit the term of leadership. Its development needs a long-term plan and strategy. After all, the stability and consistency are essential to all the countries and companies. For instance, in sport field if a

23、 coach can bring a team for a long period of time, the teams tactics or cast can keep stable so that they can get some great achievements. The NBAs coach Phil Jackson has worked in Chicago Bulls and Los Angeles Lakers for more than 30 years. And he has won eleven NBA titles. From what has been discu

24、ssed above, we could safely draw the conclusion that most of times we need some changes to improve our situation. But sometimes new leaders often lack the necessary skill and experience to cope with existing problems; therefore, they need a period of time for adaptation.issue10The speaker alleges th

25、at even though some of wilderness areas could be developed for economic gain, nations should pass laws to preserve them in their natural state. I tend to take a neutral attitude. I concede that it is necessary to preserve these areas for diversity of species and long-term development of human beings

26、. However, not all the countries have enough finance to do it. Thus, we should take some correct measures to find a balance in the seeming contradiction.First of all, the number of original eco-system is decreasing. All of them will disappear very quickly without any protections. But they are the mo

27、st valuable natural resource on earth because they can offer enough space to keep the normal function of the food chain and biosphere. On the other hand, there are a lot of examples that commercial exploitation of wilderness areas has a bad influence on the environment. For instance, Brazil governme

28、nt held the program about the exploitation of Amazon Jungle led to the soil erosion. However, the economic development of some wilderness areas is limited because of lack of soil resource. To these areas, it is difficult to meet the requirement of their citizens if they cannot be exploited. Especial

29、ly some less developed areas, the economy of them was further burdened by protection instead of exploitation. Improving the well-being of their citizens is a top priority to local governments. Actually, we can find a balance between the economic development and the environmental protection. For one

30、thing, governments can develop the tourism potential of these areas. They can make these areas change to some famous touristic places so that it can increase the financial income to improve the well-beings of their citizens. The American Yellowstone holds a good example for us. For another thing, go

31、vernments can also upgrade the industrial structure to improve the efficiency of industry and agriculture. Thus it can remit the urgency of the wilderness areas exploitation.From what has been discussed above, we could safely draw the conclusion that the importance of protection of wilderness areas

32、is the same as the exploitation. If only we can take the correct measures, they can benefit from each other.issue11The speaker alleges that forces not of peoples making largely determine their behavior. I think this statement is too extreme. I concede that peoples behavior is often influenced by many factors. However, not in all the situations people cannot control their behavior. Someone has an iron will so that they can refuse the influence that comes from outside world. Admittedly, sometimes people will be influenced by the other peoples behavior. For instance, children are curi