1、Heli KaatrakoskiAbstractAn extensive structural change currently underway in Finnish welfare society is evident in the change in the societal division of labour between the public, private and third sectors. This change seems to be guided by the neo-liberalist New Public Management (NPM) doctrine. I
2、n workplaces this change is evident in the emergence of new organisational forms and new ways of organising work. From the point of view of employees, the emergence of new forms of organisations with blurred and mixed boundaries can affect them in many ways: work may become fragmented, less secure a
3、nd more individual. The pressures to customer orientation, profitability and constant evaluation, among others, create changes in organisations and their activities. NPM typically has a linear view of the world through which it underestimates the balance between productivity, customers and employees
4、. In other words, NPM emphasises the points of view of the organisations (productivity) and its services (customers) while it undermines the quality of working life (employees). An imbalance is also evident in power relations between organisations, thus affecting employees daily work.My research int
5、erest is two-layered. Firstly, I am interested in activities that aim to develop employees own work in a situation of organisational change. For that, I focus on power relations between agents in intervention sessions. Secondly, I am studying local work activity in the context of a changing broader
6、society mainly being interested in the effects of societal change as materialised in employees speech. I approach these issues through discourses, word meaning and the movement of meaning. The theoretical framework of my study is cultural historical activity theory, which is based on Karl Marxs mate
7、rialistic view of historically developed human consciousness. The theory views human activity as object-oriented, mediated by tools and signs, and social and historical in nature. I have chosen to use Faircloughs critical discourse analysis (CDA) “method” to analyse my discursive data. In his framew
8、ork, Fairclough divides the analysis into three interlinked levels: the level of text (description, linguistics), the level of discursive practice (interpretation, micro-sociology) and the level of social practice (explanation, macro-sociology). The main challenge in my study consists of bridging ac
9、tivity theory and the method of critical discourse analysis.The empirical data consist of 61 interviews (about 67 hours) and 15 intervention sessions (about 31 hours). In addition, I have complementary data consisting of 62 documents and 156 newspaper and magazine articles. The data were collected f
10、rom four organisations, representing new organisational forms. The organisations are the Work Training Foundation Tekev (a multi-agency organisation), the City of Tampere (internal purchaser-provider split), the Finnish Road Administration (external purchaser-provider split) and the City of Espoo (o
11、utsourcing model). Developmental sessions were conducted in Tekev and Tampere.The intervention method used was the Hybrid Laboratory, inspired by the Finnish intervention method known as the Change Laboratory. The aim of the Tampere intervention was to record the experiences of the purchaser-provide
12、r split pilot combined with the process thinking model, and to develop proposals to solve problems. Tekevs preliminary intervention theme was to develop the organisational culture. Tekev was established by eight public and third-sector organisations and the merger was still in process. During the in
13、tervention, the development focused on co-operation with other organisations, future-oriented planning and evaluation.1. IntroductionIn the late 1980s the neo-liberalist New Public Management (NPM) doctrine and organisational models stressing market logic in public and third-sector activity graduall
14、y arrived in Finland, thus initiating changes in the nature of the Finnish welfare society. The trend followed changes that leaders in several Anglo-Saxon and Western countries had executed some years earlier. Today, the position of NPM seems contradictory: some researchers argue that it is “dead”,
15、but in fact it seems very much alive at least in Finland. NPM ideas are evident in the change in the societal division of labour between the public, private and third sectors. An ongoing extensive structural change in the Finnish welfare society is one way to describe the current situation.At the or
16、ganisational level, the change in workplaces can be seen through the emergence of new organisational boundary-crossing (see, e.g., Kerosuo, 2006) forms and new ways of organising work. The reorganisation of work and organisations means that the private and third sectors increasingly assume more resp
17、onsibility for providing services and production that used to belong to the public sector. What makes for example, the character of the purchaser-provider split interesting is that it changes the traditional hierarchical structure in organisations, relations between agents, steering processes and th
18、e whole logic of such activity (Meklin 2006, 22-23).When the public sector transfers production and the provision of services to other sector agents, administrative tasks such as purchasing and tendering become more central to the work of public sector employees. The nature of the work changes and m
19、ay become very different from what it used to be. From the employees point of view, the emergence of new forms of organisations with blurred and mixed organisational boundaries may affect them in many ways: activities turn out to be fragmented and the idea of the work may become less secure and more
20、 individual. Ones relationship to the organisation may also become insecure with regard to responsibilities and loyalty (see e.g. Grimshaw et al., 2005). Insecurity and risk-taking, in addition to independence, are also characteristic of the self-employed. Kovalainen & sterberg (2000, 80-81) argue t
21、hat the reorganisation of the public sector pushes its employees to begin working as the self-employed and as subcontractors. This shift as such is not a negative phenomenon if it is based on ones own choice.Kalliola and Nakari (2006, 35) claim that the NPM doctrine has a rational and linear view of
22、 world and it undermines the balance between productivity, customers and employees. In other words the NPM doctrine stresses the point of view of the organisations (productivity) and services (customers) while at the same time as it undermines the quality of working life (employees). In this study,
23、my interest lies in the employees perspective.The reason I became involved in this extremely interesting and demanding research area goes back several years. Since 2003 I have been working in the former Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research, now (as of the beginning of 2009) kno
24、wn as CRADLE or the Center for Research on Activity, Development, and Learning at the University of Helsinki. The centre is very active in studying and developing the work of various organisations all over Finland. When my supervisor, Professor Yrj Engestrm, introduced a project that he and some of
25、his colleagues planned to carry out, I became very interested in it and in the multidimensional challenge it seemed to offer. I was lucky to be recruited for the project, and as a result, this study is based on data gathered during the project.The project was called Options of privatization and shar
26、ed responsibility (Yksityistmisen ja yhteisvastuun ylisektoraaliset vaihtoehdot). It began on 1 November 2004 and lasted until 29 February 2008. The aim of the project was to delineate different kinds of hybrid organisations in Finland and to develop an intervention method for such organisations. Th
27、e organisations chosen for the project were defined as hybrid organisations representing organisations currently experiencing the societal change underway in Finland. The hybridity in and of organisations was first defined in the project to mean that traditional, generally known and accepted boundar
28、ies of organisations are crossed to form new functional entities, or that these organisational boundaries are somehow blurred, mixed or transformed (Pirkkalainen & Kaatrakoski, 2007). Later, the definition of hybridity was refined to take into account the societal division of labour. That is, hybrid
29、ity came to mean changes in the societal division of labour that are realised inside the organisations or between the organisations (Pirkkalainen & Kaatrakoski, 2009).Four organisations were chosen for the project. The Finnish Road Administration represented a pure external purchaser-provider split
30、organisation at the state level. The City of Tampere (day care and primary school) was one of the municipal-level organisations representing an internal purchaser-provider split where the production/service production is mainly internal. The other municipal-level organisation, the City of Espoo (eld
31、erly care), represented the outsourcing model. In the outsourcing model, the organisation is not divided to purchasers and providers, but part of the production is organised internally and part externally in varied amounts. The fourth case was the multi-agency organisation Tekev which, though formal
32、ly an independent third-sector organisation, remains strongly governed by other organisations (which purchase services from Tekev, send customers to Tekev or otherwise work in co-operation with Tekev) and retains both business and social dimensions in its activity (Pirkkalainen & Kaatrakoski 2009). Participants (total 61) were interviewed in all four organisations, and developmental interventions (15 sessions) were conducted in Tampere and Tekev. The interv
copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有
经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1