2019年土木-建筑-外文翻译-外文文献-英文文献-消防自动喷水灭火系统抗震设计Word文件下载.doc

1、Patterson, NY Special fire sprinkler system installation guidance intended to guard against damage due to earthquakes first appeared in the North American sprinkler installation standard in 1947, and was largely based on experience in the Long Beach earthquake of 1930. At that time many building cod

2、es in use in the United States did not even address the subject of earthquakes. Insurance reports of the Long Beach earthquake had indicated 90 damaged sprinkler systems. The first guidance, contained only in the appendix, called for 1 to 2 inches clearance around pipes, flexible couplings in risers

3、 and “some form of lateral and longitudinal bracing” for feed and cross mains.In the 1951 edition requirements were placed in the body of the standard for placement of longitudinal and lateral braces with spacing indicated as “30 to 40 ft”, a maximum slenderness ratio of brace members of 200, and fl

4、exible couplings on risers where it was necessary to protect systems against earthquakes. The stated intent was to laterally brace for 50% of weight of water-filled piping and attachments.In the decades since then deliberate efforts have been made to clarify the rules and improve protection within t

5、he text of NFPA 13 Installation of Sprinkler Systems, but always with the intent of addressing “how” systems are to be protected against earthquakes, not “where” such protection is to be provided. It was recognized that building codes and other authorities made the basic decisions with regard to the

6、 location of earthquake-prone areas. Although the earliest guidance contained in NFPA 13 came from the insurance industry in the western states, the NFPA Committee on Automatic Sprinklers formed an Earthquake Protection Subcommittee in 1985. One of the goals of this subcommittee was to develop a mea

7、ns to address the bracing of sprinkler systems in the same manner that the application of system hydraulics had been accomplished. Although a complex subject, it was believed that many of the design aspects could be pre-engineered into tables and then properly applied by the technicians who normally

8、 lay out and detail fire sprinkler systems. The 1983 standard contained no information on the sizing or fastening of bracing relative to loads. A method was proposed in 1984 whereby “zones of influence” could be evaluated to determine total loads for proposed brace locations. Tables were proposed fo

9、r determining maximum brace loads and allowable fastener loads based on six different combinations of brace and fastener orientation and angle from vertical. This concept and the accompanying tables were accepted into the appendix of the standard in the 1987 edition, and in the 1989 edition the tabl

10、es were expanded to nine combinations of orientation and angle and moved into the body of the standard. 2007 Structures Congress: New Horizons and Better Practices 2007 ASCECopyright ASCE 2007 Structures Congress 2007Downloaded 06 Mar 2009 to 202.118.74.100. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or

11、 copyright; see http:/www.ascelibrary.orgThe NFPA 13 Earthquake Protection Subcommittee was in place at the time of the Loma Prieta and Northridge earthquakes in 1989 and 1994, and held public hearings in cooperation with the National Fire Sprinkler Association and the Society of Fire Protection Eng

12、ineers following those events in order to evaluate how fire sprinkler systems performed during the earthquakes ands to develop suggestions for improvements to the protection criteria within the standard.In general, the performance of fire sprinkler systems in those earthquakes was judged to be good,

13、 with a strong correlationbetween observed failures and departures from the rules of NFPA 13. One area acknowledged to be in need of improvement was the interaction of sprinklers and ceilings; impact of sprinklers against rigid ceilings resulted in a several high-profile incidents in which a number

14、of sprinklers opened and water damage resulted. In 1999 the NFPA sprinkler project was reorganized. Responsibilities for the earthquake protection rules were given to a new NFPA Technical Committee on Hanging and Bracing of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems, one of four separate technical committe

15、es coordinated through a Technical Correlating Committee responsible for NFPA 13. This allowed the direct input of more earthquake engineering expertise into the standard development process. Major changes in building code requirements for earthquake protection have taken place in the past twenty years, mainly due to the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program （NEHRP） provisions developed with funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.The NEHRP provisions initially found their way into the codes through direct adoption,