1、重整制度在我国理论界 就很少见之研究,更不用说重整人制度的研究了。因此,本文就以重整人制度 为研究对象,希望这有助于我国的重整制度的立法。全文包括六章以及前言, 约三万余字。行文如下:前言部分通过对破产清算功能局限性的论述引出重整制度的功能,并进一 步介绍了重整人制度的概念及各国对之的相关称谓,最后结合我国当前对重整 人制度的立法及理论研究状况,阐述了重整人制度研究具有现实意义。第一章是导论。该章共分两节,第一节运用历史分析的方法,对重整人制 度产生的原因与历史沿革进行了归纳。现代意义上的重整制度产生于英国,发 展于美国,成熟于日本和我国台湾地区。第二节对重整与重整人制度的价值进 行了分析,提
2、出了重整制度不但对效率优先追求,而且对公平具有内在保护的 价值。第二章论述了重整人制度的概念和地位。对于重整人制度的概念,学者间 的表述基本一致,即认为重整人是由法院选任的、在重整期间负责公司业务的 经营管理和公司财产的占有处分,以及拟定、提出、执行重整计划的重整公司 的实际负责人和业务执行机关。它与公司重整前的董事会、与破产管理人或清 算组有着显著的法律区别。研究重整人的法律地位,对厘清重整人的权利和义 务具有重要理论意义和实践意义。关于重整人的法律地位,学术界存在代理说 和公吏说两种学说之争。但二者都存在缺陷。本文认为,要准确界定出重整人 的法律地位,就得从理顺重整人与法院、重整企业以及利
3、害关系人等各方面的 关系着手。第三章研究了重整人选任的准则。通过考察有关国家或地区的重整制度, 发现重整人选任的准则存在两种相对立的观点。本文认为,这种分歧是缘于对 公正和效率二者关系的权衡。并主张,重整人的选任应根据重整中介组织发展 阶段而定。因此对于目前我国的实际情况,认为我国的重整人选任应以原债务 人的董事续任为原则,以局外人续任为例外。第四章论述了重整人的资格条件。重整人在一定程度上讲,它掌握重整企 业的生死命运,因此研究重整人应具备哪些条件就十分值得和必要。本文分别 从积极条件和消极条件方面加以了阐述。对于积极资格条件,笔者认为重整人 必须要懂经济、懂管理和懂法律;对于消极的资格条件
4、,可以借鉴公司法中关 于董事、经理等人员的限制。第五章是重整人的权利和义务。综合各国法的规定,重整人的职权大致有 六个方面,即接收债务人移交的财产及与其财产有关的一切簿册文件;管理、 清理、处分债务人的财产;营业管理权;撤销权的行使及对抵消权和取回权的 承认;诉讼权;拟定和提出重整计划。我国的企业破产法(草案)对于重整 人的职权没有规定制定重整计划这一条,因此应该完善。对于重整人的报酬和 补偿,我国采取的是法院决定的做法,这不适合经济规律的要求,因此就借鉴 德国支付不能法的规定,即由重整人与关系人会议协商确定之后,由法院在程 序予以确认。在义务承受方面,着重阐述了重整人的在任义务与离任义务。第
5、六章是重整人的监督和法律责任。权利与义务的存在是对立统一的,但 权利有被滥用的时候,义务有被不履行的可能,因此有必要对重整人进行法律 监督。监督重整人的机制主要由以下三方面构成:法院的监督;关系人会议与 重整监督人的监督;专设的行政机构的监督。我国做法与上文的第二种做法有 些类似,这种做法不好之处在于:法院在破产程序中的任务比较烦琐,对管理 人进行监督可能流于形式;而监督人又是债权人利益的代表,其倾向于采取对 债权人有益的监督措施。这实际上进一步导致了债权人和破产人与其他利害关 系之间利益的不平衡。因此,笔者提出:在重整程序中设置重整监督人或者检 查人,以此对重整人进行监督。法律责任除刑事责任
6、、民事责任外还应包括行 政责任。关键词:重整人重整人地位重整人选任重整人资格权利义务监督法律责任AbstractIn view of the more and more important role of large corporation in the social economy life, and in order to overcome the passive characteristics of the Settlement System, reorganization system turned up in the twentieth century and becomes a m
7、ore effective insolvency precaution system, which is the new part of the modern insolvency system. Its attention not merely lies in how to make enterprises avoid liquidating procedure , but make those company which will go bankruptcy recover and strengthen, and thus protect interests of various fiel
8、ds such as the shareholder , creditor , worker. With the development of socialist market economy of our country, historical limitation and defect of the current bankruptcy law are outstanding day by day, among them rectifying system can not catch up with the times especially. For this reason, our co
9、untry go on ten over long years already to modifiy this law, but also a draft so far. But this has also offered abundant time for us to study the caretaker system. Reform system has been researched very little in our country, not to mention the Caretaker system. Therefore, the thesis research on car
10、etaker system. The full text includes six sections and preface , more than about 30,000 words. The base content is as follows:The preface part, through drawing and reforming the function of the system in liquidating the argumentation of the function limitation, introduce concept and relevant appella
11、tions to their of various countries of system again further, combine the legislation to system of theoretical research state at present of our country finally, explain caretaker system study , have realistic meanings again.Chapter one is the introduction. This chapter was divided into two together,
12、method that section one uses history to analyze, the reason why the system produced and historical evolution have been summed up to caretaker. Reformation system of modem meaning evolve from Britain, develop on U.S.A., ripe to Japan and Taiwan of our country. To reform with caretaker value of system
13、 go on , analyze , propose , reform system until efficiency comes first pursue again section two, and to having inherent value that protect fairly.Chapter two expound the caretaker concept and status of system again. Concept of the system as to caretaker, statement of scholar basically identical, th
14、ink, caretaker select court let , responsible for company business manage with company property occupying and punishing during reforming again, draft , propose , carry out reformation actual director and business executive organ of company planned to reform. It and Company board of directors , clear
15、 group have prominent law to distinguish with bankrupt caretaker reform Study the legal status of caretaker, have important theory meaning and practice meaning in clarifying the right and obligation of caretaker. About legal status that caretaker, academia have agent mediate a settlement common official say two battle of theory. But the two all have a defect . This text thinks , want accurate circle make legal status that caretaker, must from make caretaker , reform enterprise and interested part
copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有
经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1