英语六级真题及参考答案完整版.docx

1、英语六级真题及参考答案完整版2021年6月英语六级真题及参考答案完整版四六级试卷采用多题多卷形式，大家核对答案时，请找具体选项内容，忽略套数。注：对题目和选项内容，不要纠结套数、ABCD顺序的问题无忧考网搜集整理了各个版本(有文字也有图片，图片可以自由拉伸)，仅供大家参考。网络综合版：听力ConversationOneMan:(1)Its my last day at work tomorrow.Ill start my new job in 2 weeks.My human resources manager wants to conduct an interview with me bef

2、ore I leave.Woman: Ah, an exit interview. Are you looking forward to it?Man: Im not sure how I feel about it. I resigned because Ive been unhappy at that company for a long time, but Im not sure if I should tell them how I really feel.Woman: To my way of thinking, there are two main potential benefi

3、ts that come from unleashing and agitated stream of truth during an exit interview. The first is release. Unburdening yourself of frustration, and perhaps even anger to someone who isnt a friend or close colleague can be wonderfully free.Man: Let me guess. The second is that the criticism will, theo

4、retically, help the organization Im leaving to improve, making sure employees of the future are less likely to encounter what I did?Woman: Thats right. But the problem with the company improvement part is that very often it doesnt happen. An exit interview is supposed to be private, but often isnt.I

5、n my company, the information gained from these interviews is often not confidential.(2)The information is used as dirt against another manager, or can be traded among senior managers.Man: Now youve got me rethinking what Ill disclose in the interview.(3)There is always a chance that it could affect

6、 my reputation and my ability to network in the industry.It is a pretty small industry after all.Woman: Anything you initially gained from the instant satisfaction of telling it like it is, you might lose down the track by injuring your future career prospects.Man: Right.(4)Perhaps I would be better

7、 getting things off my chest by going to one of those rate-your-employer websites.Woman: You could.And dont do the interview at all. Exit interviews are not mandatory.Q1: What do we learn about the man from the conversation?A) He will tell the management how he really feels.B)He will meet his new ma

8、nager in two weeks.C) He is going to attend a job interview.D) He is going to leave his present job.Q2: What does the woman think of the information gained from an exit interview?A) It should be kept private.B) It should be carefully analyzed.C) It can be quite useful to senior managers.D)It can imp

9、rove interviewees job prospects.Q3: Why does the man want to rethink what he will say in the coming exit interview?A)It may leave a negative impression on the interviewer.B)It may adversely affect his future career prospects.C)It may displease his immediate superiors.D) It may do harm to his fellow

10、employees.Q4: What does the man think he had better do?A)Prepare a comprehensive exit report.B)Do some practice for the exit interview.C)Network with his close friends to find a better employer.D)Pour out his frustrations on a rate-your-employer website.ConversationTwoMan: Today, Im talking to the r

11、enowned botanist, Jane Foster.Woman: Thank you for inviting me to join you on the show, Henry.Man: Recently, Jane, youve become quite a celebrity,(5)since the release of your latest documentary. Can you tell us a little about it?Woman: Well, it follows my expedition to study the vegetation indigenou

12、s to the rain forest in equatorial areas of southeast Asia.Man: You certainly get to travel to some very exotic locations.Woman: It was far from glamorous, to be honest. The area we visited was accessible only by canoe and the living conditions in the hut were primitive to say the least.(6)There was

13、 no electricity.Our water supply was a nearby stream.Man: How were the weather conditions while you were there?Woman: The weather was not conducive to our work at all, since the humidity was almost unbearable. At midday, we stayed in the hut and did nothing.(6)It was too humid to either work or slee

14、p.Man: How long did your team spend in the jungle?Woman: Originally, we planned to be there for a month. But in the end, we stayed for only 2 weeks.Man: Why did you cut the expedition short?Woman: Halfway through the trip,(7)we received news that a hurricane was approaching. We had to evacuate on ve

15、ry short notice.Man: That sounds like a fascinating anecdote.Woman: It was frightening. The fastest evacuation route was through river Rapids. We had to navigate them carrying all of our equipment.Man:(8)So overall was the journey unsuccessful?Woman:(8)Absolutely not.We gathered a massive amount of

16、data about the local plant life.Man: Why do you put up with such adverse conditions?Woman: Botany is an obsession for me. Many of the destinations I visit have a stunning scenery. I get to meet a variety of people from all over the world.Man: So where will your next destination be?Woman: I havent de

17、cided yet.Man: Then we can leave it for another vacation. Thanks.Questions 5 to 8 are based on the conversation you have just heard.Q5: What does the man want Jane Foster to talk about?A) Her unsuccessful journeyB)Her month-long expeditionC)Her latest documentaryD)Her career as a botanistQ6: Why doe

18、s the woman describe her experience as far from glamorous?A)She had to live like a vegetarianB)She was caught in a hurricane.C) She had to endure many hardshipsD) She suffered from water shortageQ7: Why did the woman and those who went with her end their trip halfway?A)A hurricane was comingB)A floo

19、d was approachingC)They had no more food in the canoe.D) They could no longer bear the humidityQ8: What does the woman think of the journey?A) It was memorableB)It was unbearableC) It was uneventfulD)It was fruitfulPassageOneScientists often use specialized jargon terms while communicating with laym

20、en.(9)Most of them dont realize the harmful effects of this practice.In a new study, people exposed to jargon when reading about subjects like autonomous vehicles and surgical robots. Later said they were less interesting in science than others who read about the same topics, but without the use of

21、specialized terms.They also felt less informed about science and less qualified to discuss science topics. Its noteworthy that it made no difference if the jargon terms were defined in the text. Even when the terms were defined, readers still felt the same lack of engagement as readers who read jarg

22、on that wasnt explained.The problem is that the mere presence of jargon sends a discouraging message to readers. Hillary Schulman, the author of the study, asserts that specialized words are a signal. Jargon tells people that the message isnt for them. Theres an even darker side to how people react

23、to jargon.(10)In another study, researchers found that reading scientific articles containing jargon led people to doubt the actual science.They found the opposite, when a text is easier to read. Then. People are more persuaded.Thus, its important to communicate clearly when talking about complex sc

24、ience subjects. This is especially true with issues related to public health, like the safety of new medications and the benefits of vaccines.（11）Schulman concedes that the use of jargon is appropriate with scientific audiences. But scientists who want to communicate with the general public need to

25、modify their language. They need to eliminate jargon.Questions nine to eleven are based on the passage you have just heard.Q 9: What does the passage say about the use of jargon terms by experts?A) It diminishes laymens interest in scienceB)It ensures the accuracy of their argumentsC) It makes their

26、 expressions more explicit.D) It hurts laymens dignity and self-esteem.Q10: What do researchers find about people reading scientific articles containing jargon terms?A) They can learn to communicate with scientistsB)They tend to disbelieve the actual scienceC)They feel great respect towards scientis

27、tsD)They will see the complexity of scienceQ11: What does Schulman suggest scientists do when communicating with the general public?A) Find appropriate topicsB)Stimulate their interestC) Explain all the jargon termsD)Do away with jargon termsPassageTwoAt the beginning of the twentieth century, on th

28、e Gulf coast in the US state of Texas, there was a hill where gas leakage was so noticeable that schoolboys would sometimes set the hill on fire.(12)Patio Higgins, a disreputable local businessman, became convinced that there was oil below the gassyhill.Oil wells werent drilled back then.They were e

29、ssentially dug.(13)The sand under the hill defeated several attempts by Higgins workers to make a proper hole.Higgins had forecast oil at 1000 feet, a totally made-up figure. Higgins subsequently hired a mining engineer, captain Anthony Lucas.(14)After encountering several setbacks, captain Lucas de

30、cided to use a drill, and his innovations created the modern oil drilling industry. In January 1901,at 1020 feet, almost precisely the depth predicted by Higgins Wild Gas, the well-roared and suddenly ejected mud and six tons of drilling pipe out of the ground, terrifying those present.For the next

31、nine days until the well was capped, the well poured out more oil than all the wells in America combined.In those days, Texas was almost entirely rural, with no large cities and practically no industry. Cotton and beef werethe foundation of the economy.(15)Higgins well changed that. The boom made so

32、me prospectorsmillionaires, but the sudden surplus of petroleum was not entirely a blessing for Taxes. In the 1930s, prices crashed to the point that in some parts of the country, oil was cheaper than water.That would become a familiar pattern of the boom or bust Texas economy.Q12:What did Texas businessmen Patio Higgins believe?A) The local