建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:6756416 上传时间:2023-01-10 格式:DOCX 页数:10 大小:26.03KB
下载 相关 举报
建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共10页
建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共10页
建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共10页
建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共10页
建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共10页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社.docx

《建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社.docx(10页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社.docx

建筑专业英语课文15华中科技大学出版社

1.5CommentsonArchitecturalDesign

1.5.1LightandGravity

Inthearchitecturalopus,lightgeneratesspace:

withoutlight,spacedoesnotexist.Naturallightbringsplasticformstolife,shapesthesurfacesofmaterials,controlsandbalancesgeometriclines.Thespacegeneratedbylightisthesouloftheactofarchitecture.Constructedvolumesconvergetodefinethespacesthataretheultimategoalofthearchitecturalproject.Voidsarewhatdictatespatialandfunctionalrelationships,controllingvisuallinesandgeneratingpotentialemotions,expectations,interpretations.

Lightisanaturalentitythatexistsaboveandbeyondarchitecture,anditsreasonliesinitsconfrontationwiththeconstructedwork,inthepassageoftimethroughthesolarcycleandinthecontinuouschangeofseasons.Light,forthearchitect,isthevisiblesignoftherelationshipthatexistsbetweenthearchitecturalworkandthecosmicvaluesofitssurroundings:

itistheelementthatshapestheworkinitsspecificenvironmentalcontext.Itdescribesitslatitudeandorientation,andestablishestheartefact’srapportwiththeuniquefeaturesoftheenvironment.Gravityistheforcethatbindsthearchitecturalopustotheground.Wecouldsaythatitconstitutestherationalefortheconstructionalprincipleinseekingequilibriuminordertotransmitloadstothesoil.Theprimesignofconstructioncomesfromtheactionoflayingastoneontheground.Thus,weshouldrefernottostoneonstone,buttostoneonsoil:

allarchitecturesbearwithinthemthisabsoluteconditionofbeingpartoftheearth.Throughconstructedwork,manperpetuatesthisparallelwithMotherEarthandperformsanactionthattransformsaconditionofnatureintoadeedofculture.Layinganartefactonthesoilchallengestheexistingbalance,inthequestfornewenvironmentalvaluesthatcanbearwitnesstotheirowndayandage.Theconstructedlandscapeisthemirror—sometimesmerciless—ofthecommunitythatexpressesit.Itisawaytolendformtohistory,awaytoimpartcontinuitytothepopulationsthathaveexisted.Inotherwords,itisawayforustofeelthatwearetheartificersofourownage.

Thesearesomeofthethoughtsthatariseinponderingthiscollectionofrecentarchitectures.Thesubtlecontinuityoftheethicalandprofessionalcommitmentthatlinksdifferentprojectsundergoesaslowandchallengingevolutionovertheyearsthatarenotalwaysevidenteventothearchitecthimself.Quiteoften,theattentionthatispaidtoindividualprojectsevadesgeneralmotivations,andthesearchfortechnical/designsolutionstakespriorityoverthedoubtsandquestionsthatarisewhenonefacestheenigmaofawhitesheetofpaperonthedrawingboard.Attimes,“doing”isgivenprecedenceover“thinking”.

Infaceofthevarietyofthemesencounteredoverthecourseofadecade,theselectionofworksproposestwobasicaspectsofthisfieldasthekeytointerpretation:

lightandgravity.Thesearetwoconstantsaroundwhichitispossibletopursueaninterpretationthatmaybecapableofhighlightingcurrentinterestsandrecentcontradictions.Theyarerealaspectsthatbelongtoallconstructedarchitecturalworksand,asaresult,itmayseemnaiveorevenfutileatthispointtoattempttointerprettheirmessages.Throughexperimentation,currenttrendsorculturalapproaches,thecultureofcontemporaryarchitectureseemstomoveawayfromexaminingtheseprimaryaspectsofbuilding(lightandgravity),almostasifthearchitecturalworkcanforgothem.

Indeed,onegetstheimpressionthatthoseworkinginthisfieldtodayhaveotherconcerns,whichnolongeraddresstheconstructedworkbutfocusaboveallonvirtualaspectsandcomparisons,fleetingmoments,surfacecomponentsandplayfulaspects,seeminglytheonlyonesstillcapableofgalvanisinganyinterestindebateinthisdiscipline.Accentuatingaspectsthatareforeigntothesetrends,aboveandbeyondstylesandlanguages,canseemunrealisticorinappropriate.Onthecontrary,Ibelievethatturningtheattentionofarchitecturetocertainessentialcomponentsisawayofmeasuringtheirabilitytointerpretthecontemporaryworld.

Inthefrenziedproposalsofextravagantexperimentationandtragicexpunctionputforthinrecentyears,thearchitecturalmessagesthatemergeoftenshirkthisdiscipline,turningtoneighbouringfields—thevisualarts,advertising,literaryinterpretations—therebyjustifyingalackofcommitmenttothetaskspertinenttoarchitectureandthequestforthequalityofspaces.Theseapproachesarespentinthevirtualnatureofacademicargument,andtheyleavecitizensdisarmedbeforetherealproblemsthatcompelthemtofaceveritableurbanbattleseverydayinordertomoveabout,work,pauseandlive.Itseemsthatthecivicandsocialcommitmentthathassustainedthehopesofthisdisciplineforthousandsofyearshasvanished.Newformsofexpressionstooptothelawssuggestedbystandardizationtothedictatesofthevogueandthemarket,inwhicheverything—andanything—isreducedtomerchandisetobeembracedandappraisedbasedsolelyoneconomicinterests.Inthefaceofthisdisarmingportrait,Icandiscernthatthereneverthelessremainmarginsforcontributingtoworksthatcanemergeaspositiveexpressionsandtakeontheresponsibilitiesandenormouspotentialofourera.Inthecurrentenvironmentalconfusionpromptedbysuchrapidtransformation,perhapsthemainstayforanycriticaloppositioncancomeaboutbyreinterpretingthecityasaspecificspacecapableofshoulderingtheburdenofcollectiveaspirations.Thecity,asthesupremeentityoftheaggregationoflifeandhope,canbecomeaninstrumentformeasuringtheneedsofitscitizensandthevaluesofthishabitat,toarriveatanewunderstandingoftherapportthatexistswithoursurroundings.TheEuropeancitycontinuestobeanextraordinarymodelofaggregation.Itsmillenarystratificationmakesitthebulwarkofquality,andanalternativetothemodelsofsuburbiaorthe“non-places’’thatareinvokedtodayasiftheyweretrue“values”.Theantibodiesthatmatureinthe“local”contextofdifferentculturesthusfindaprivilegedspace,andtheycanactasantidotestopermitthegrowthofcriticalthoughtcapableoffacingthecontradictorynatureofourwayoflife.Thecityremainsafortressinthelandscapeofmemoryinwhichthearchitectiscalledupontothinkandact.Today,interpretingcertainarchitecturesthroughthefilteroflightandgravityisintendedasameansofreaffirmingthehopesofthisdisciplineandallowingthearchitecttobecomereconciledwiththecity,viewedasthehighestexpressionofcollectiveliving,asupremeformofintelligence,andasignofcreativitythat

—insomecases—becomessheerpoetry.

Exercises

I.Fillintheblankswiththecorrectanswer.

1.histimeinVenice,MarioBottahastheopportunitytomeetandworkforLeCorbusierandLouisI.Kahn.

A.WithB.By

C.AtD.During

2.Inthearchitecturalopus,generatesspace:

withoutlight,spacedoesnotexist.

A.functionB.form

C.shapeD.light

3.Lightisanaturalentitythatexistsaboveandbeyondarchitecture,anditsreasonliesinitsconfrontationwiththeconstructedwork,inthepassageofthroughthesolarcycleandinthecontinuouschangeofseasons.

A.shapeB.color

C.airD.time

4.istheforcethatbindsthearchitecturalopustotheground.

A.GravityB.Space

C.LightD.Form

5.Infaceofthevarietyofthemesencounteredthecourseofadecade,theselectionofworksproposestwobasicaspectsofthisfieldasthekeytointerpretation:

lightandgravity.

A.overB.on

C.withD.in

6.Onthecontrary,Ibelievethatturningtheattentionofarchitecturetocertainessentialcomponentsisawayofmeasuringtheirabilitytointerpretthe_____world.

A.contemporaryB.classical

C.renaissanceD.ancient

II.TranslatetheitalicsentencesinthetextintoChinese.

1.5.2Bigness

Beyondacertainscale,architectureacquiresthepropertiesofBigness.ThebestreasontobroachBignessistheonegivenbyclimbersofMountEverest:

“becauseitisthere”Bignessisultimatearchitecture.Itseemsincrediblethatthesizeofabuildingaloneembodiesanideologicalprogram,independentofthewillofitsarchitects.

Ofallpossiblecategories,Bignessdoesnotseemtodeserveamanifesto;discreditedasanintellectualproblem,itisapparentlyonitswaytoextinction-likethedinosaur-throughclumsiness,slowness,inflexibility,difficulty.Butinfact,onlyBignessinstigatestheregimeofcomplexitythatmobilizesthefullintelligenceofarchitectureanditsrelatedfields.

Onehundredyearsago,agenerationofconceptualbreakthroughsandsupportingtechnologiesunleashedanarchitecturalBigBang.Byrandomizingcirculation,short-circuitingdistance,artificializinginteriors,reducingmass,stretchingdimensions,andacceleratingconstruction,theelevator,electricity,air-conditioning,steel,andfinally,thenewinfrastructuresformedaclusterofmutationsthatinducedanotherspeciesofarchitecture.Thecombinedeffectsoftheseinventionswerestructurestalleranddeeper-Bigger-thaneverbeforeconceived,withaparallelpotentialforthereorganizationofthesocialworld—avastlyricherprogrammation.

Theorems

Fuelledinitiallybythethoughtlessenergyofthepurelyquantitative,Bignesshasbeen,fornearlyacentury,aconditionalmostwithoutthinkers,arevolutionwithoutprogram.DeliriousNewYorkimpliedalatent“TheoryofBigness”basedonfivetheorems.

1.Beyondacertaincriticalmass,abuildingbecomesaBigBuilding.Suchamasscannolongerbecontrolledbyasinglearch

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 法律文书 > 调解书

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1