企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译.docx

上传人:b****3 文档编号:633319 上传时间:2022-10-11 格式:DOCX 页数:9 大小:27.49KB
下载 相关 举报
企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共9页
企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共9页
企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共9页
企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共9页
企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共9页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译.docx

《企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译.docx(9页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译.docx

企业重塑品牌的原则外文翻译

毕业论文(设计)外文翻译

一、外文原文

标题:

Principlesofcorporaterebranding

原文:

Literaturereview

Incorporatebranding,majorclassicworksincludeOlins(1978,1994),Gregory(1991),Dowling(1994),Fombrun(1996)andInd(1997).Althoughinvaluableandcreative,theytendtofollowarelativelytraditionalmarketingcommunicationandplanningframework.Morerecentbooks(BalmerandGreyser,2003;Olins,2003;Ind,2004;Schultzetal.,2005;SchroederandSalzer-Morling,2006;deChernatony,2006)havefocusedonnuancessuchaslivingthebrand,theroleofexperiencesandinternalbranding.Recentspecialissuesofjournalsonthetopichaveextendedthedebate(SchultzanddeChernatony,2002;Balmer,2003;Balmeretal.,2006;MelewarandKaraosmanoglu,2006).

Althoughwerefertocorporatebrands,verysimilarpropertiesapplytoorganisationalbrands,servicebrands(Berry,2000;deChernatonyandSegal-Horn,2003;deChernatonyetal.,2005)andretailerbrands(BirtwistleandFreathy,1998;BurtandSparks,2002;DaviesandChun,2002;MerrileesandFry,2002;AilawadiandKeller,2004),withahighdegreeofinterchangeabilityacrosstheterms.Onewayofsummarizingthecorporatebrandliteratureistocontrastthenatureofcorporatebrandswithproductbrands.Firstly,theorganizationfeaturesmorestronglyandexplicitlyincorporatebrands(HatchandSchultz,2003).Cultureandstructurearecriticalforcorporatebrands,notsimplyforimplementationreasons,butasamajorpartofthebrandessence.Anotherwayofexpressingtheorganizationalaspectistoemphasizetheroleofinternalprocessesorinternalbrandingaspartofcorporatebranding(Bergstrometal.,2002;GappandMerrilees,2006;VallasteranddeChernatony,2006).Secondly,corporatebrandsarelikelytobemorecentralandstrategic,controlledbyhigher-levelmanagementsuchastheChiefExecutiveOfficer(HatchandSchultz,2003).Thirdly,corporatebrandsarelikelytobemoreabstract,representinghigher-ordervalues(likefreedomorpurity)comparedtomorefunctionallybasedproductbrands(deChernatony,2002;Urde,2003).Fourthly,corporatebrandsaremorecomplex,withpotentiallydifferentbrandmeaningsacrossdifferentstakeholders(BalmerandGreyser,2002).

Mostrelevantliteraturedealswithspecificissuessuchasthepotentialgapbetweentheespousedcorporatebrandandtheactualbrandimagestakeholdersmayhaveofacompany(DaviesandChun,2002).However,KnoxandBickerton(2003)andHatchandShultz(2001,2003)giveusefulframeworksforintegratingcomponentsofcorporatebranding.

Corporaterebrandingcanbecontrastedtocorporatebranding,whichreferstotheinitialcoherentarticulationofthecorporatebrandandcanoccuratanytime.Corporaterebrandingreferstothedisjunctionorchangebetweenaninitiallyformulatedcorporatebrandandanewformulation.Thechangeinbrandvisioncanbereferredtoasbrandrevision.Theprocessofexecutingtherevisionthroughouttheorganizationwouldmostlikelyrequireachangemanagementprocess.Withcorporatebranding,organizationalissuesmaywellinvolvesomechanges,buttheemphasisisongettinggallunitstoadhereconsistentlytopolicyandprocedurespecifications(suchascommonletterheadsorbusinesscards,ortheuseofcolors).However,withcorporaterebranding,allunitsneedtobemovedfromonemindset/culturetoanother.

Shiftingfocusfromcorporatebrandingtocorporaterebranding,wefindlessresearchorconsensus.AnearlyacademicpaperonrebrandingwasBerry’s(1988)summaryofOgilvyandMather’sbrandrevitalizationprogram.Acommontriggerforrevitalizingbrandsisunder-performance(Kapferer,1997).Usingrenaming,anarrowapproachtorebranding,bothMuzellecetal.(2003)andMuzellecandLambkin(2006)foundthatstructuralfactorssuchasmergersandacquisitionswerethemaindriversofrebranding,withbrandimageimprovementrankedlower.Beforefocusingonrebrandingsuccessfactors,wenoteStuartandMuzellec’s(2004)argumentthatrebrandingmaynotbethesolutiontosomeproblems.Theysuggestthatrebrandingconsiderationsincludecomprehensiveassessmentofpotentialbenefits,clarityaboutwhatisbeingsignaled,andcheckingthatkeystakeholdersunderstandandsupporttheproposedchange.

Fouracademiccasestudiesmakemajorcontributionstounderstandingcorporaterebranding.Ewingetal.(1995)studiedtherebrandingofMazda(SouthAfrica)withachangefromanarrowfocusondurabilityandreliabilitytoamorecomplexanddifferentiatingsetofcorevalues–quality,technologyandexcitement.Themainlessonsweretheneedsforsensitivitytotheexistingcustomerbase,strongadvertising,andforinternalbrandingwithinthedealernetwork.Theselessonswerepackagedasasimplemarketingplanframework.

SchultzandHatch(2003)provideinsightsintothedevelopmentp

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 教学研究 > 教学案例设计

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1