Influence of consumers.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:5029745 上传时间:2022-12-12 格式:DOCX 页数:19 大小:39.75KB
下载 相关 举报
Influence of consumers.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共19页
Influence of consumers.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共19页
Influence of consumers.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共19页
Influence of consumers.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共19页
Influence of consumers.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共19页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

Influence of consumers.docx

《Influence of consumers.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Influence of consumers.docx(19页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

Influence of consumers.docx

Influenceofconsumers

Influenceofconsumers'socioecologicalandeconomicorientationsonpreferencesforwoodproductswithsustainabilitylabels

RalfHansmann

ThomasKoellner

andRolandW.Scholz

SwissFederalInstituteofTechnologyZurich(ETHZürich),InstituteforHuman-EnvironmentSystems(HES),ChairofEnvironmentalSciences:

NaturalandSocialScienceInterface(NSSI),Haldenbachstrasse44,ETHZentrumHAD,CH-8092Zürich,Switzerland

Received29October2003; 

revised4June2004; 

accepted27June2004. 

Availableonline2November2004.

Abstract

Aquestionnairewasdevelopedtoassesspeople'ssustainabilityorientationconcerningforestsconsideringtheecological,social,andeconomicaldimensionandtoassesstheirknowledgeoflabelsforsustainableforestry(SF).Thequestionnaireitemswereusedtoanalyzetherelationshipbetweentheindividualsustainabilityorientationofapersonandtheknowledgeofsustainabilitylabelsandtheattentiontoandpreferenceforlabeledwoodproducts.Anexperimentaldesignembeddedinthesurveyshowedthatthecommunicationofcorrespondinglabelinformationenhances(statedintentionsconcerning)attentiontoandpreferenceforlabeledproductsinaprospectivepurchasingsituation.Moreover,resultsshowedthatasustainabilityorientationfavoringecologicalandsocialaspects,ascomparedtoeconomicalaspectsofforestry,correlatespositivelywiththestatedintentionsinfavorofthepurchasingoflabeledwoodproducts.Thepositivecorrelationoftheseintentionswiththeaprioriknowledgeoftheparticipantswasonlymarginallysignificant.TheresultsindicatethatitispossibletosuccessfullypromoteSFandtoenhancethedemandforcorrespondinglycertifiedproductsthroughmarketingandotherstrategies.Thesemightincludethegenerationofinnovativecertificationsystemsinatransdisciplinary,participatoryprocess.

Keywords:

Sustainableforestmanagement;Certification;Sustainableforestry;Woodlabels;Sustainability;Communication

ArticleOutline

1.

Introduction

2.

Methodandhypothesis

2.1.Content,procedure,andexperimentaldesignofthesurvey

2.1.1.Assessmentofindividualsustainabilityorientations

2.1.2.Assessmentofknowledgeofwoodlabels

2.1.3.Experimentalmanipulationandassessmentoftwodependentvariables

2.2.Constructionofascaleformeasuringindividualtendenciesofweighingecologicalandsocialaspectsofforestsascomparedtoeconomicaspects

2.3.Hypotheses

2.3.1.Absoluteweighingofecological,social,andeconomicaspectsofforests

2.3.2.Weighingofecologicalandsocialvs.economicaspectsofforestsandpurchasingintentionsforwoodproductswithsustainabilitylabels

2.3.3.Knowledgeconcerningsustainabilitywoodlabelsandpurchasingintentionsforcorrespondingwoodproducts

2.3.4.Effectsofinformationaboutsustainabilitylabelsonpurchasingintentionsforcorrespondingwoodproducts

3.

Results

3.1.Absoluteweighingofecologicalandsocialvs.economicaspectsofforests

3.2.Levelofknowledgeonwoodlabels

3.3.Effectsofsustainabilityorientation,labelknowledge,andcommunicationonpurchasingintentionsforlabeledwoodproducts

4.

Conclusion

References

1.Introduction

ThisarticletakesaSwissperspectiveoncertificationcriteriaforthesustainabilitylabelingoftimberproducts,onthesustainabilityorientationofindividuals,theirknowledgeaboutsustainableforestry(SF)labelsandtheirpurchasingintentionsconsideringtheselabels.ConclusionsforthedevelopmentofSFlabelsandcertificationcriteriaandforcorrespondingmarketingandcommunicationstrategieswillbediscussed.Inlightofincreasingglobalizationandliberalizationofthemarkets,thepossibilitiesoftransferringmarketingstrategiesfromanationalperspectivetoothernationalperspectivesandtoaninternationallevelareofgreatinterestandpracticalrelevance(Bruhn,1997).ThereadersarethusencouragedtoengageinacomparisonofthesituationandproblemsinSwitzerlandwiththeirowndomesticsituationandtoconsiderthetransferabilityoftheviewpointsoncertificationcriteriaandeco-labelmarketingpresentedinthisarticle.

Acomprehensiveconceptofsustainabilityencompassesecological,social,andeconomicaspects(WorldCommissiononEnvironmentandDevelopment,1987andRenn,1996).Thesethreedimensionsarealsoapplicabletothesustainabilityofforestmanagement(VanMansveldandvanderLubbe,1999,Kissling-Näf,2000,SuterThalmann,2000,Eidetal.,2001andKrott,2002).ThecertificationoftimberfromSFandtheuseofcorrespondinglabelscommunicatetotheconsumersthestandardsthathavebeenfollowedintheproductionofthewood.Asgenerallyholdstrueforbrandlabelsofproducts(Bruhn,1997andMüller-Hagedorn,1997),fromaneconomicperspective,theuseofSFlabelsisaimingatpotentialmarketadvantages(Rametsteiner,2002,p.163).Thebasicideaisthat,ifthereexistsafitbetweenthestandardscommunicatedbythelabelandthestandardsornormsofpotentialconsumers,thedemandoftheseconsumersforthelabeledproductswillincreaseascomparedtotheirdemandfornonlabeledproducts.ThepersonalinvolvementandinterestconcerningSF,thecommitmentoftheconsumerstothestandardsofacertainlabelandthetrustwhichconsumershaveinaSFlabelappeardecisiveindeterminingconsumer'sbrandloyalty(Fukuyama,1995,Blomqvist,1997andChaudhuriandHolbrook,2001).Trustseemsparticularlyimportantinthiscontextbecausetheconsumersofwoodproductsarenotabletorecognizedirectlytheecologicalandsocialstandardswhichhavebeenmetwhenthewoodwasproduced(WeiberandAdler,1995).Thus,trustworthinessrepresentsaprerequisiteforanSFlabeltobesuccessfulinthemarket(BarneyandHansen,1994).AccordingtoDelgado-BallesterandMunuera-Aléman(2001),theinfluenceofconsumer'sbrandtrustonbrandloyaltyasmeasuredinconsumer'scommitmentandpricetoleranceisparticularlystrong,consideringconsumptiondecisionswithhighpersonalinvolvement.

InSwitzerland,theinvolvementofthepopulationinquestionsofSFisassuminglystrongerthaninmanyothercountries.ThisissuggestedbythestrongpositiveecologicalattitudesandthehighenvironmentalconcernoftheSwiss(DiekmannandFranzen,1999andFranzen,2003)bytheirextensiveuseofforestsforrecreationalactivities(SchmithüsenandWild-Eck,2000,SuterThalmann,2000andWild-Eck,2001)andbytheevidentprotectivefunctionsoftheSwissforests,inparticular,consideringavalanches.Moreover,theextremelyhighlevelofsubjectivelyperceivedpoliticalparticipationoftheSwiss(Paldam,2000)—whichispresumablyfavoredbytheSwissFederalismandbytheconstitutionalelementsofdirectdemocracy—mightalsocontributetotheirpersonalinvolvement.

AsurveyoftheSwissFederalAgencyofEnvironment,ForestsandLandscape(BundesamtfürUmwelt,WaldundLandschaft[BUWAL],1999)showedthatconsideringSFcertification,theSwiss(would)haveconsiderabletrustininternationalenvironmentalorganizations,intheBUWAL,andintheorganizationsrepresentingtheSwissforesteconomyandtimberindustry.However,theywouldhavelesstrustinthecompaniesmanufacturingthewoodproducts,intheadministrationsofforeigncountriesandoftheEuropeanCommunity,andineconomicorganizationsontheEuropeanlevel.

Acompetitiveadvantageofcompaniespossessingcertificatesformatchingecologicalstandardscan,inthelongrun,createaspilloverofpositiveecologicaleffectsasfurthercompaniesmighttrytofulfillthestandardsofsuchcertificates.Suchpositiveecologicalspillovereffectsareabasicideaofecologicallabelsfromtheecologicalperspective.Withrespecttosustainabilitylabels,afitbetweenthestandardsofalabelandthestandardsoftheconsumermightbedescribedbyapositiveattitudeoftheconsumertowardsthestandardsguaranteedbythelabel,whichbasesontheidentityorsimilarityofthevaluesoftheconsumerandthevaluesunderlyingthecertificationcriteria.Thisfitcanleadtopositiveidentificationwiththelabel,toeffectivecommitment,andattitudinalloyalty(DickandBasu,1994,Gundlachetal.,1995andChaudhuriandHolbrook,2001).Accordingly,consumershavinghighstandardsconcerningprotectionoftheenvironmentwillpreferproductswithecologicallabels,whichemphasizetheecologicalproductionoftheseproducts.Consumershavingstronginternalstandardsconcerningsocialaspectswilltendtopreferproductswithlabelsthatemphasizesocialstandards,suchasfairtradelabels.Therefore,itappearsinterestingtomeasurepeople'sindividualtendenciesconcerningtherelativeimportancetheyattachtothethreesustainabilitydimensionsandtosubsequentlyrelatethismeasurementtopreferencesforlabeledwood.Adirectquestioningofpersonsconcerningthepersonalweightingofecological,social,andeconomicaspectsdoesnotseemtobeappropriateforthisassessment,astheseconceptsareveryabstractandbecausepre-orunconsciousinfluencesoncognitioncanhavedistortingeffectsontheanswers(HuberandMandel,1994andSchutt,1999).Similartopsychologicaltests,thedevelopmentofastandardizedquestionnaireappearsappropriate,withscalesthatmeasuretheseabstractconceptsthroughvariousitems.Forthepresentstudy,acorrespondingquestionnairewasdeveloped,whichshouldmeasureaperson'ssustainabilityorientationconcerningforestsandwhich,consequently,shouldbeable,atleasttosomeextent,topredictthestatedintentionsofconsumerstoprefertimberproductsthatarelabeledwithcertificatesemphasizingecologicallyandsociallyappropriatewoodproduction.

A

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 考试认证 > 从业资格考试

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1