化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿.docx

上传人:b****1 文档编号:29121890 上传时间:2023-07-20 格式:DOCX 页数:21 大小:54.10KB
下载 相关 举报
化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共21页
化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共21页
化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共21页
化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共21页
化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共21页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿.docx

《化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿.docx(21页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿.docx

化学问题意识外文文献翻译备课讲稿

(4)创新能力薄弱

上海市劳动和社会保障局所辖的“促进就业基金”,还专门为大学生创业提供担保,贷款最高上限达到5万元。

创业首先要有“风险意识”,要能承受住风险和失败。

还要有责任感,要对公司、员工、投资者负责。

务实精神也必不可少,必须踏实做事;

(四)大学生对手工艺制品消费的要求

调研结论:

综上分析,我们认为在学院内开发“DIY手工艺品”商店这一创业项目是完全可行的。

虽然调查显示我们的创意计划有很大的发展空间,但是各种如“漂亮女生”和“碧芝”等连锁饰品店在不久的将来将对我们的创意小屋会产生很大的威胁。

2、你大部分的零用钱用于何处?

原文

题目:

Using“Whatif..”questionstoteachscience

Abstract

Withthewideningknowledgebasestudentswillneedtobemoreflexibleintheirlearninghabits.Traditionally,teachingschoolscienceofteninvolvesteacher-centredmethodslikelectures,experimentaldemonstrationorguidedinquiry.Plainknowledgedisseminationwillnotadequatelypreparestudentstocopewiththechangingworld.Hence,schoolsneedtotrainstudentstobereflectiveintheirlearninghabits–thatis,gettingstudentstobeobservant,togeneraterelevantalternativesandtomakesenseoftheseideas.Thisarticlediscussesawell-documentedreflectivelearningstrategy-theuseof“whatif”questions,tohelpstudentsextendtheirlearningbeyondcurricularrequirements.Studentsareintroducedtoadistillationsetupandthenaskedtopose“whatif”questionsaboutit.Theirquestionsandthecorrespondingpeerresponsesareawealthofinformationforteacherstoexplorehowsciencemaybetaughtdifferentlyandwithagreaterimpactontheirstudents’learningexperience.

Introduction

Thepresentsciencecurriculumincludesarangeofstudentlearningoutcomescoveringlaboratoryandexperimentalscience(MOE,2007).Researchersandscholarshadarguedthattherolesofexperimentsandpracticalworkinschoolsshouldallowstudentstopracticelaboratoryskills,learnthevariousinvestigativeprocessesandacquirefirsthandexperiencesindealingwithmaterialsandlaboratorywares(Boud,DunnandHegarty-Hazel,1986;Doranetal,2002;Hegarty-Hazel,1986;Josephsen,2003;Woolnough,1990).Besidesthesecognitiveandpsychomotorobjectivesofschoollaboratorycourses,therearealsosuggestionsthatlessonsshouldbemademoreattractivethroughmoreintellectuallydemandingcoursesandnewteachingtechniquesthatcanmotivatestudentstolearn(Schmidt,2000).Thispaperdiscussesawell-documentedreflectivelearningstrategy-theuseofquestionsposedbystudentstohelpthemextendtheirlearningbeyondcurricularrequirements(ChinandChia,2004;WalshandSattes,2005).Specifically,itdiscussestheuseof"whatif"questionsposedbystudents(Fogarty,1994).Studentsareintroducedtoadistillationsetupandthenaskedtopose"whatif"questionsaboutit.Theirquestionsandthecorrespondingpeerresponsesprovideteacherswithagoodinsightonhowstudentscontributetoknowledgebuildingthroughself-createdlearningopportunities.Theentireexperiencemayalsohelptocreateaclassroomteaching-learningcultureinwhichtheteachertakesontheroleoftheadvancedlearneramongnovicelearners.

Conductingthelesson

Traditionallyalessononexperimentalsciencewouldcommencewithteachertalk,studentevaluationandthenpossibly,aconfirmatoryexperimentalexperienceinthelaboratory.Inquiry-basedlessonsmaytweakthelessonstructureabit,withtheteacherstartingalearningtaskbyaskingaquestion.Forexample,

“Ifyouarestrandedintheopenseaonasmallboat,howwouldyougoaboutmakingsomefreshwatertodrinkfromtheseawateraroundyou?

(Assumingyouhavetheessentiallaboratorywareswithyou.)”

Theteachermaythenfollowupbyfacilitatingaclassdiscussionandendwiththeteachersummarizingandcontextualizingthediscussiontofitthecurricularrequirements.

MortimerandScott(2003)intheirbook,MakingMeaninginSecondarySchoolScience,suggestedthatstudentsshouldengageinsomeformofdialogicactivityiftheyaretodevelopanunderstandingofasciencetopic.Inthisrespect,classroomtalk,learningandmeaningmakingwouldnotmakestrangebedfellowsbutareessentialfeaturesinthescienceclassroomthatwouldensurestudentsgainsomeimpactfullearningexperiences.

Thelesson,whichthepresentdiscussionisbasedon,involvedboththetraditionalclassroomlessondeliveryandtheengagementofstudentdialogicprocess.Itwasconductedforagroupoftensecondarythreeexpressstudents(equivalenttograde8). Thestudents,fourgirlsandsixboys,wereselectedbytheirChemistryteachertoattendaremediallessononthetopicof“SeparationTechniques”.Theycamefromtwodifferentclassestaughtbythesameteacher.Theseparationtechniquetoberevisedinthe40-minutelessonwason“SimpleDistillation”.Theauthorofthispaperwasrequestedbytheirteachertoteachthisremediallesson.Theauthor(referredtoasthe‘remedialteacher’inthispaper)isalsoaqualifiedandexperiencedschoolscienceteacherofover16years.TheproceedingsofthelessonaresummarizedinTable1.

Approximate

Timeframe

Learning/teachingevents

Pedagogicalapproach

10minutes

-Introduction

-Importanceofseparationtechniquesinchemistry

-Exampleofatechnique:

SimpleDistillation

Teachertalk

10minutes

-Activity:

Studentstoposequestions

-Firstattempt:

Invitationtoverbalisethequestions(nostudentsvolunteered)

-Secondattempt:

Invitationtowritedownthequestionsstartingwiththewords“Whatif..”

(Studentswereobservedtobeactivelyontask.)

Reflectivelearningstrategy:

Useof“whatif”questionstogetstudentstoobservethelearningtaskandgenerateresponses(inthiscaseposedquestions)

20minutes

-Activity:

Teacher-facilitatedthediscussiononthewhatifquestionsposedandwritten bythestudentsonslipsofpaper.

-Theslipsofpaperwerecollectedandeachstudent’swrittenquestionswereprojectedonvisualiserandopenlydiscussedbythestudentswithcommentsandevaluativeremarksmadebytheteacher.Studentswereinstructednottowritetheirnamesonthepaper.

Reflectivelearningstrategy:

studentsengagedinmeaningmaking(thatis,attemptingtoanswer,critiqueandperhapsre-phrasethequestionssothatsomerelationshipscanbeestablishedamongtheideasgenerated).

5minutes

-Summary:

teachersummarisedstudents’responsestothelearningtasks

-Conclusion:

teacherconcludedlessonwithareviewofthedistillationmethod

Teachertalk

Table1:

LessonProceedings

Aftertheformalgreetingsandasimpleself-introduction,theremedialteacherproceededtoexplaintheimportanceofseparationtechniquesinchemistry.Hecitedsimpledistillationasanimportanttechniquethatallowsustoobtainapuresolventorliquidfromacontaminatedliquidsample(asolutionorasuspension).Afullylabelleddiagramoftheapparatussetupforsimpledistillationwasprojectedonthescreenwiththehelpofavisualiser(Figure1).Referringtothediagramonthescreen,theremedialteacherthenproceededtoexplainhowthesimpledistillationapparatusworks.Thestudentswereattentiveandsomewerebusytakingnotes.Thissegmentofthelessonlastedabouttenminutesandwastotallydeliveredbyteacher-talk.

Figure1.Diagramofasimpledistillationsetupfordistillingseawater.

 Atthisjuncture,studentswereinvitedtoverballyaskanyquestionabouttheapparatussetup.Therewasashortpausewithnoresponsefromthestudents.Theremedialteacherthenrequestedthattheypentheirquestionsonblankpiecesofpaper.Again,thereweresome“thoughtful”actions(forexamples,aboyhadhischinproppedbyhishandonthetableandafewgirlsshowedcontortedeyebrows,allpresumablydeepintheirthoughts).Mostofthemstaredblanklyatthediagramprojectedonthescreen.Again,noonewroteanything.

Theremedialteacherthenwrotethefollowingwordsonthewhiteboard–“Whatif…”andinstructedstudentstobeginposingtheirquestionswiththesetwowords.Healsoaddedthattheycouldaskanythingabouttheapparatussetup,includingthematerials,products,reactionconditionsoranythingthatinterestthem,solongasitwassomethingrelatedtothesimpledistillationprocessorapparatussetup.Theycouldaskquestionsthattheyknowtheanswers,orquestionsthattheydonotknowtheanswers.Noexamplesweregiventothestudentsotherthantheseinstructions.

Itwasobservedthatstudentsbegantopentheirthoughts,writingdownthequestionsandraisingtheirheadsperiodicallytorefertothediagramshownonthescreen.Ittookabouttenminutesbeforemostofthembecameexhaustedofideasandafewstartedtocuriouslypeekintotheirneighbours’work.Theremedialteacherthencollectedthepapersandbegantoflashthemonebyoneonthevisualiser.Foreachstudent’squestionspresented,theremedialteacherfacilitatedanalmostspontaneousresponsefromthefloor.Studentswereobservedtobechattywhileafewshowedamusementsattheirpeers’questions.Therewasalivelycontributiontothepossibilitiesraisedbythequestions,includingdifficultandunfamiliarsituationsarisingfromquestionslike“Whatifthereisnocondenserthere?

”and“WhatiftheBunsenburnerwasreplacedbyacandle?

”(Figure2)

 

 

 

Figure2.“Whatif..”questionscansurfaceunfamiliarexperimentalsituations

The“whatif”questionsandpeerresponses

Theactivitygeneratedalistof26questionsfromthetenstudents(Table2).Thesequestionscanbebroadlyclassifiedinto11differenttypesof“Whatif…”questionspertainingtothetopiconsimpledistillationofseawater.

 

 

Conditions

 

 

BroadQuestionsAsked

 

Frequency

A

Missingmaterials

1.“Whatiftherewasnoboilingstonesintheflask?

6

B

Changeinsetupofapparatus(includingmissingpieces)

2.“Whatifthepositionsofthewaterinletandoutletofthecondenserwereswitched?

2

3“Whatiftherewerenothermometerinthesetup?

1

4.“Whatiftherewerenocon

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 人文社科 > 法律资料

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1