教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:28954537 上传时间:2023-07-20 格式:DOCX 页数:18 大小:27.01KB
下载 相关 举报
教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共18页
教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共18页
教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共18页
教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共18页
教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共18页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文.docx

《教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文.docx(18页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文.docx

教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文

教资面试高中英语阅读浅析高中英语阅读教学教师的提问技能的论文

[中文摘要]

阅读是学一门语言必备的技能,它是掌握语言的基础,也是获取信息的主要手段。

高中英语新课程标准也都强调英语阅读能力培养的重要性。

因此,如何上好阅读课以及培养学生的阅读能力就成了摆在教师面前的重要问题。

在提倡以学生为中心的课堂的情况下,教师必须探求如何在阅读课上引导学生进行阅读并促使他们积极地参与到教学活动中来。

而教师的提问策略作为英语阅读教学的主要方法,对引导学生进行如何有效阅读起着至关重要的作用,它很大程度上决定着教学质量的好坏。

然而,现在英语课堂上的提问策略存在种种问题,很多问题的有效性不高。

本文通过分析目前高中英语阅读教学中提问策略所存在的问题,总结分析提问的类型以及提问技巧策略,并对如何在高中英语课上有效应用提问技能提出了自己的看法。

1.Introduction

ReadingisoneofthefouressentialskillsinEnglishlanguagelearning.Asthemostimportantreceptiveskillinforeignlanguagelearning,readingisplacedatkeypositionintheNew

EnglishCurriculumStandard.However,Englishreadingcomprehensionhasbeenaheadacheformostofstudents,whodon’treallyknowhowtoread.Thushowtoteachreadingwidelyandeffectively

hasbecomeaproblemofutmostimportance.

Sofar,mostlearnersofEnglishasaforeignlanguageinChinalearnthetargetlanguagefromtheirteachersintheclassroom.Therefore,beingoneofthemostcommonlyusedteaching

strategiesinEFLEnglishasaForeignLanguageclassroom,questioningundoubtedlyplaysanimportantroleincarryingouteffectiveclassroomactivities.JustasGeoffThompsoninthe

TrainingTeacherstoAskQuestionspointsoutoneofthemainformsofinteractionbetweenthelanguageteacherandthelearneristhroughquestions.Questioningshouldbeemployedbothin

passingonknowledgeandindevelopinglearners’readingabilitiesinreadingclass.Byquestioning,teacherscanknowaboutatwhatlevelthestudents’proficiencyand,what’smoreimportant,

theappropriatequestionscanelicitstudentstoanalyzeandthinkaboutthekeypointsofthetext,whichenhancestudents’practicallanguageabilities.Infact,askingquestionseffectively

isnotaseffectiveasitseems.Teachers’questioningisnotasimpleteachingprocess.Itrequirestheteachers’effortsoffurtherstudyandrealpractice.

2.Analysisofquestioninginreadingclass

2.1Definitionofteachers’questioning

Questioningisaneffectiveteachingtechniqueinreadingclass.Thereisalonghistoryofstudyingquestionsingeneraleducation.Morethan2000yearsago,questioninghadattractedthe

educators’attention.ConfucianinChinapromotedelicitingteachingandSocratesadvocatedatalk-and-answermethod,whichareallmeaningfulineducationtoday.In1912,Americanscholar

Stevenwasthefirsttointroduceclassicalresearchinclassroomquestioning.Hesuggestedthatclassroomteachingisactuallyacircleofask-and-answeractivity.Researchersshowthatduring

acareerintheclassroom,atypicalteacherwillaskaboutoneandahalfmillionquestions.

Sowhat’steachers’questioning?

“Inclassroomsettings,teachers’questionsaredefinedasinstructionalcuesandstimulithatconveytostudentsthecontentelementstobelearnedand

directionsforwhattheyaretodoandhowtheyaretodoit.Questionsenableteacherstoengagestudentsinhigherlevelsofcognitionor,morespecifically,criticalthinking.”[1]Through

questioning,teachersenablestudentstoengageintheclass,gettingspecificinformation,understandingthepurposesofthetextandsavoringthebeautyofthetext,whichleadtoreachgoals

ofteachinginreading.Atthesametime,intheask-and-answerprocess,communicationbetweenteachersandstudentsisfrequent,whichundoubtedlygivestudentsmorechancestousetarget

language.

2.2TheImportanceofquestioninginreadingclass

“AccordingtoLarryA.Harris&CarlB.Smith,readingisthereader’sinteractionwithaprintedmessageinEnglishasasecondlanguageacrossarangeofactivethinkoperationsforsome

purposessuchastofindinformation,tocompareortoenjoyinoroutofclasses,guidedbyateacher.”[2]Theinteractionrequiresboththeextractionofinformationandanactiveresponse

toideas.Therefore,readingisnotapassivebutanactiveandconstructiveprocess.However,intraditionalteacher-centeredclassroom,theteacherisregardedasanauthority,whodominates

thewholeclass.Thisteacher-initiativeproceduretreatsstudentsaspassivereaders,whichspoilsstudents’interestsinreadinganditseffectiveness.Inrecentfewyears,moreandmore

emphasishasbeenputoncreatingstudent-centeredclassroom,wheretheteacherisjustanorganizeroraguideratherthanadominator.Asinstructionbecomesmorelearner-centered,teachers’

areincreasinglybeingaskedtoguidelearningratherthansimplydeliverinformation.Questioningisthemostimportanttoolteachershaveformeetingthisgoal.

Inthemostcommontypeofclassroomquestioningknownas‘IRF’Initiation-Response-Feedbackpattern,appropriatequestioningcanfulfillanumberofdifferentfunctions.Weusequestioning

inreadingteachingtostimulatethinking,assessstudentprogress,checkonteacherclarity,attractstudents’attention,maintainclassroomcontrol,emphasizekeypointsandhelpstudentsto

findouttheirdrawbacksandsoon.Questionsarethesparksthatignitesstudents’thoughtprocess.Thusteachersmustknowandusegoodquestioningstrategiestodevelopstudentsreading

abilities.

2.3Questioningintheprocessofreadingclass

Therearethreestepsofteachingofreading:

pre-reading,while-reading,post-reading.Therefore,questioningarevariousineverystep

ⅰInpre-readingactivity,therearemostlylead-inquestions.Teachersasksomequestionsaboutthereadingbackgroundandapplymanyelicitingquestionstostimulatestudentstothink,

memorizeandpredict.Thesequestionspromotestudentsintereststoreadthetext,improvestudents’readingefficiencyandgetmoreinformation.

ⅱWhile-readingactivityisthemostimportantactivityinreading.Displayquestionsarepresentedinthisstep,whichisaskedaccordingtothecontent,mainideasandlanguagepointsin

thistext.Throughsomedetailquestionsaboutthetext,studentsfindoutthekeywordsfromthetexttoanswerthequestions.ItnotonlymakeSstudentsunderstandthetextfully,butalso

provideSchancestousethetargetlanguage.

ⅲInpost-readingactivity,referentialquestionsareutilized.Afterreading,theteachermakesasummarythroughaskingquestionsaboutthesubject,writingstyle,andrhetorical

technique.Itencouragesstudentstoparticipate.

2.4Problemsofteachers’questioning

Questioningisoneofthemostimportantwaysintheteachingofreading.Butinreality,questioningarenotaseffectiveastheyareexpected.Highschoolteachersarenotfullyawareof

theeffectsofteachers’questioningonstudents’understandingofthetext.Theypaylittleattentiontothestrategiesofquestioninginthereadingclass.Asaresult,theteachers’

questioningisonlyasuperficialformofclassroomactivity,lackingthepracticalvalue.Itcan’tstimulatestudentstojoinin,norcanitdeveloptheirreadingability.Therearestillmany

problems:

2.4.1Lackofclearaimsinteachers’questioning

InhighschoolEnglishteaching,teachersarerarelyawareoftheirquestioningwhichaffectsstudentsofdifferentlevels.Manyteachersoftenaskquestionsjusttoknowwhichstudenthas

memorizedaparticularlanguagepoint,whichcontributeslittletounderstandthetextandstudentsarelikelytofeelboredandreluctanttoparticipate.What’smore,iftheteachers’aimof

askingquestionsisonlytoaskstudentstoanswer“Yes”or“No”,theclassroomatmospherewillbeboringandcan’tattractstudents.Suchquestionsshouldbeavoidedinordertohavean

effectiveteaching.

2.4.2Concentrationoflowerlevelsofquestions

Effectivequestioningsequencesshouldincludeamixtureofbothlowerlevelquestionsandhigherlevelquestionsandvarywiththeobjectivesofthelesson.Researchonteachers’questioning

revealedthatmostquestionsrequirestudentstomemorizethekeypointsinthetextandhighlevelquestionslikeevaluationquestionsarefew.Lowlevelquestionslike“whoistheman?

“Whenandwherewasheborn?

”canbefoundfromthetextsandstudentsjustneedtoreadouttheanswerwithoutanythought.Therefore,itcannotdevelopstudents’readingability.However,

highschoolteachersasktoomanyfactual,closedanddisplayquestions,andthesekindsofquestionscouldnotpromotestudents’interestinreading.

2.4.3Inadequatewait-time

Wait-timeisthink-time.Properwait-timegivesstudentstimetothink,butmostteacherstendnottowaitlongenoughbetweenquestionsorbeforeansweringtheirownquestions.Itisnot

goodforcallingonstudentstoparticipateinthereadingclass,especiallytothestudentswhoarenotconfidentinspeakinginpublic.Ontheotherhand,toomuchwait-timecanalsobe

detrimentaltostudentsresponsestoteachers’questioning.Becausewhennooneseemstobeabletoansweraquestion,morewait-timewillnotnecessarilysolvetheproblem.Theamountof

wait-timedependsuponthelevelofquestionstheteacherasksandstudents’proficiencylevels.

2.4.4Improperfeedbackandassessment

Refertoteachers’questioning,theirfeedbackandassessmentplaysanimportantrole.Ithelpslearnerselaborateontheirexistingunderstanding.Andfeedbackisalsoimportantfor

motivationbecauseitprovidesstudentswithinformationabouttheirincreasingcompetenceandhelpssatisfytheirintrinsicneedtounderstandhowthey’reprogressing.

ManyhighschoolEnglishteachershaveproblemswithhandlingstudents’response.Someteachersprovidenofeedbackandassessmenttostudents’answers,takingthemasnatureinclassroom

activities.Someteachersgivecasualorinadequateassessmentorfeedbacktotheanswersofstudents,simplyoffers“Yes”or“No”whichlowerstudents’enthusiasm.Othersgivenegative

fe

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 自然科学 > 物理

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1