关于投稿及询问信的写法及注意事项.docx

关于投稿及询问信的写法及注意事项.docx

《关于投稿及询问信的写法及注意事项.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《关于投稿及询问信的写法及注意事项.docx（7页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

关于投稿及询问信的写法及注意事项

我的询问信

DearEditors,

Wedispatchedourmanuscript（manuscriptID8558192903066551）toyourjournalabouttenweeksago.Wehavenotyetreceivedareplyandamwonderingwhetheryouhavereachedadecision.Wefearthatoursubmissionprocessdoesnotmeettherequirements andshouldbegratefulifyoukindlygiveussomeinformationregardingthestatusofthemanuscript.

Thanksforyourinformation.

Withkindregards,

SCI投稿常用英语

一、投稿信

1.DearDr.DefendiML:

Iamsendingamanuscriptentitled“”by–whichIshouldliketosubmitforpossiblepublicationinthejournalof-.

Yourssincerely

2.DearDr.A:

Enclosedisamanuscriptentitled“”bysb,whichwearesubmittingforpublicationinthejournalof-.Wehavechosenthisjournalbecauseitdealswith-.Webelievethatsthwouldbeofinteresttothejournal’sreaders.

3.DearDr.A:

Pleasefindenclosedforyourreviewanoriginalresearcharticle,“”bysb.Allauthorshavereadandapprovethisversionofthearticle,andduecarehasbeentakentoensuretheintegrityofthework.Nopartofthispaperhaspublishedorsubmittedelsewhere.Noconflictofinterestexitsinthesubmissionofthismanuscript,andwehaveattachedtothisletterthesignedlettergrantinguspermissiontouseFigure1fromanothersource.

Weappreciateyourconsiderationofourmanuscript,andwelookforwardtoreceivingcommentsfromthereviewers.

二、询问有无收到稿件

DearEditors,

Wedispatchedourmanuscripttoyourjournalon3August2006buthavenot,asyet,receiveacknowledgementoftheirsafearrival.Wefearthatmayhavebeenlostandshouldbegratefulifyouwouldletusknowwhetherornotyouhavereceivedthem.Ifnot,wewillsendourmanuscriptagain.Thankyouinadvanceforyourhelp.

三、询问论文审查回音

DearEditors，

Itismorethan12weekssinceIsubmittedourmanuscript（No:

）forpossiblepublicationinyourjournal.Ihavenotyetreceivedareplyandamwonderingwhetheryouhavereachedadecision.Ishouldappreciatedyourlettingmeknowwhatyouhavedecidedassoonaspossible.

四、关于论文的总体审查意见

1.Thisisacarefullydonestudyandthefindingsareofconsiderableinterest.Afewminorrevisionarelistbelow.

2.Thisisawell-writtenpapercontaininginterestingresultswhichmeritpublication.Forthebenefitofthereader,however,anumberofpointsneedclarifyingandcertainstatementsrequirefurtherjustification.Therearegivenbelow.

3.Althoughtheseobservationareinteresting,theyareratherlimitedanddonotadvanceourknowledgeofthesubjectsufficientlytowarrantpublicationinPNAS.Wesuggestthattheauthorstrysubmittingtheirfindingstospecialistjournalsuchas–

4.Althoughthispaperisgood,itwouldbeeverbetterifsomeextradatawereadded.

5.Thismanuscriptisnotsuitableforpublicationinthejournalof–becausethemainobservationitdescribewasreported3yearsagoinareputablejournalof-.

6.PleaseasksomeonefamiliarwithEnglishlanguagetohelpyourewritethispaper.Asyouwillsee,Ihavemadesomecorrectionatthebeginningofthepaperwheresomesyntaxisnotsatisfactory.

7.WefeelthatthispotentiallyinterestingstudyhasbeenmarredbyaninabilitytocommunicatethefindingcorrectlyinEnglishandshouldliketosuggestthattheauthorsseektheadviceofsomeonewithagoodknowledgeofEnglish,preferablenativespeaker.

8.Thewordingandstyleofsomesection,particularlythoseconcerningHPLC,needcarefulediting.AttentionshouldbepaidtothewordingofthosepartsoftheDiscussionofandSummarywhichhavebeenunderlined.

9.PreliminaryexperimentsonlyhavebeendoneandwithexceptionofthatsummarizedinTable2,nonehasbeenrepeated.Thisisclearlyunsatisfactory,particularlywhenthereissomuchvariationbetweenassays.

10.Theconditionofincubationarepoorlydefined.Whatisthetemperature?

Wereantibodyused?

五、给编辑的回信

1.Inreplytothereferee’smaincriticismofpaper,itispossibletosaythat–

OneminorpointraisedbytherefereeconcernsoftheextracompositionofthereactionmixtureinFigure1.Thishasnowbeencorrected.Furtherminorchangeshadbeenmadeonpage3,paragraph1（line3-8）and2（line6-11）.Thesedonotaffectourinterpretationoftheresult.

2.Ihavereadthereferee’scommentsverycarefullyandconcludethatthepaperhasbeenrejectedonthesolegroundsthatitlaketoxicitydata.IadmitthatIdidnotincludeatoxicitytableinmyarticlealthoughperhapsIshouldhavedone.Thiswasforthesakeofbrevityratherthananerrororomission.

3.Thankyouforyourletterof–andforthereferee’scommentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“”.Wehavestudiedtheircommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwiththeirapproval.

4.Ienclosedarevisedmanuscriptwhichincludesareportofadditionalexperimentsdoneatthereferee’ssuggestion.Youwillseethatouroriginalfindingsareconfirmed.

5.Wearesendingtherevisedmanuscriptaccordingtothecommentsofthereviewers.Revisedportionareunderlinedinred.

6.Wefoundthereferee’scommentsmosthelpfulandhaverevisedthemanuscript

7.Wearepleasedtonotethefavorablecommentsofreviewersintheiropeningsentence.

8.Thankyouforyourletter.IamverypleasedtolearnthatourmanuscriptisacceptableforpublicationinCancerResearchwithminorrevision.

9.Wehavethereforecompletedafurtherseriesofexperiments,theresultofwhicharesummarizedinTable5.Fromthisweconcludethatintrinsicfactorisnotaccount.

10.Wedeletedtherelevantpassagesincetheyarenotessentialtothecontentsofthepaper.

11.Ifeelthatthereviewer’scommentsconcerningFigures1and2resultfromamisinterpretationofthedata.

12.Wewouldhaveincludeanon-proteininhibitorinoursystem,asacontrol,ifonehadbeenavailable.

13.WeprefertoretaintheuseofTable4forreasonsthatitshouldbeclearfromthenewparagraphinsertedattheendoftheResultssection.

14.Althoughreviewerdoesnotconsideritisimportanttomeasurethetemperatureofthecells,weconsideritessential.

15.Therunningtitlehasbeenchangedto“”.

16.TheMaterialsandMethodssectionnowincludesdetailsformeasuringuptakeofisotopeandassayinghexokinase.

17.TheconcentrationofHATmedia（page12paragraph2）wasincorrectlystatedintheoriginalmanuscript.Thishasbeenrectified.Theauthorsaregratefultotherefereesforpointingouttheirerror.

18.Assuggestedbybothreferees,adiscussionofthepossibilityoflaseractiononchromosomehasbeenincluded（page16,paragraph2）.

19.Weincludedanewsetofphotographswithbetterdefinitionthanthoseoriginallysubmittedandtowhichascalehasbeenadded.

20.Followingthesuggestionofthereferees,wehaveredrawFigure3and4.

21.Twofurtherpapers,publishedsinceouroriginalsubmission,havebeenaddedtothetextandReferencesection.Theseare:

22.Weshouldliketothanktherefereesfortheirhelpfulcommentsandhopethatwehavenowproducedamorebalanceandbetteraccountofourwork.Wetrustthattherevisedmanuscriptisacceptableforpublication.

23.Igreatlyappreciatebothyourhelpandthatoftherefereesconcerningimprovementtothispaper.Ihopethattherevisedmanuscriptisnowsuitableforpublication.

24.Ishouldliketoexpressmyappreciationtoyouandtherefereesforsuggestinghowtoimproveourpaper.

25.Iapologizeforthedelayinrevisingthemanuscript.Thiswasduetoourdoinganadditionalexperiment,assuggestedbyreferees

我来说几句:

1.一般投稿以后,不要有事没有事经常写信给编辑.总体来说,这些编辑都很认真负责的.我们只用静侯佳音即可;

2.所有编辑都很忙,而且有很多人同时担任多个杂志的编辑,且大多数都是兼职而非专职,所以我们应该体谅他们,尽量不要给他们制造"麻烦";

3.不同杂志有不同的程序和周期,我们一般可以从已经发表的文章当中看到相关信息:

received:

***;revised:

***;accepted***;所以我们应该心中有数;

4.应该注意的是:

不同文章的处理周期不可能是千篇一律的,有时长一点也不足为怪;

5.一般杂志的周期应该在3个月之内,所以我觉得3个月以上的情况,应该是可以写信询问的.当然也可以再等一段时间;

6.我们可以想想,如果我们自己是编辑,接到这样的来信,收到稿件不到一个月就急着询问结果,而且天天收到很多这样的信件,我们心里会怎么想呢?

而且有些时候,好象没有办法去细细与作者解释.所以我们写信也没有用,还不如不写.

下面是UKchinese战友的一个帖子,回复状态一直是UnderReview,而日期有一直在变化的疑问,有参考价值.值得注意的是:

有些网上投稿系统是不显示日期的,如ScholarOne...

每一次编辑的处理,都会有日期的变化,而状态不变.这说明你的稿件一直在编辑的关注之中,你不用写信询问.

状态一直是UnderReview,而日期在变,有以下几种情况:

1.如果杂志需要2或3名审稿人,从第一个审稿人接受审稿,第二个审稿人接受审稿,第三个审稿人接受审稿,到第一个审稿人审稿意见返回,第二个审稿人审稿意见返回,第三个审稿人审稿意见返回,这期间都是UnderReview;

2.当然也有审稿人审稿接受审稿一段时间后又拒绝审稿的情况,这时编辑得寻找新的审稿人;

3.还有审稿人的审稿意见不能按照规定的时间返回编辑手里,这时编辑得催促审稿人,在得不到有效答复后,寻找新的审稿人;

4.还有审稿人的审稿意见返回编辑手里,但编辑认为缺乏水平,他会采取不信任处理,也要寻找新的审稿人;

5.还有审稿人的审稿意见返回编辑手里,但编辑认为太简单,没有足够的参考信息,他也会寻找新的审稿人;

6.两个审稿人的意见非常矛盾,这时编辑也会考虑增加审稿人...

Trytoavoidwritingalettertoeditoronlyregardingthereviewprocess,becauseitisbeyondtheeditor'scontrol.

Ifyoudowantremindtheeditorforthetime,youcantryanothermethodsforcontacting.

Forexample:

MsNo:

Deareditor

Iamwritingregardingourabove-mentionedpaper,whichhasbeensubmitedforyourconsideration3monthsago.Itcomesintomyattentionthestatusofourpaperhasbeenkeepingon"***"foralongtime,withoutanychange.Idonotknowifitisbecauseyouarehavingdifficultiesinsecuringrefereesforourpaper.Ifthatisthecase,pleaseletusknow&Iwillprovideseveralpossiblereviewersinthisareaforyourreference.

Thankyouforyourgreateffortsonprocessingourmanuscript.

Sincerely