瑞士的股利政策外文翻译文档格式.docx

上传人:b****7 文档编号:22638355 上传时间:2023-02-05 格式:DOCX 页数:12 大小:24.03KB
下载 相关 举报
瑞士的股利政策外文翻译文档格式.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共12页
瑞士的股利政策外文翻译文档格式.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共12页
瑞士的股利政策外文翻译文档格式.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共12页
瑞士的股利政策外文翻译文档格式.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共12页
瑞士的股利政策外文翻译文档格式.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共12页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

瑞士的股利政策外文翻译文档格式.docx

《瑞士的股利政策外文翻译文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《瑞士的股利政策外文翻译文档格式.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

瑞士的股利政策外文翻译文档格式.docx

一、外文原文

原文:

DividendpolicyinSwitzerland

Dividendpolicyhaslongbeenasubjectofresearchanddebate.Therearemanytheoreticalandempiricalresultsdescribingthedecisionscompaniesmakeinthisarea.Atthesametime,however,thereisnogenerallyacceptedmodeldescribingpayoutpolicy.Moreover,empiricalfindingsareoftencontradictoryordifficulttointerpretinlightofthetheory.

IntheidealworldofMillerandModigliani(1961),dividendsareirrelevant.Thevalueofafirmisgivenbyitsinvestmentopportunities.Dividendsarejusttheresidual,andinvestorsfacedwithconsumptionshockscanalwaysgettheirown“homemade”dividends.

In“reallife”,however,dividendpolicyisoneofthemainconcernsformanagersandinvestors.Empiricalstudieshavegenerallyfoundthatdividendincreasesareconsideredgoodnewsbyinvestors,whiledividenddecreasesleadtonegativereactions.

Severalexplanationsfortheexistenceandimportanceofdividendshavebeensuggestedoverthelastdecades.Dividendscouldbeusedassignalsfortheactualpositionofafirm.Companiescouldcommunicatetheirbetterqualitybypayinghigherdividends:

low-qualityfirmswillnotbeabletoimitatethemsincedividendsinvolvecostsintermsofforegoneinvestment,taxes,ortheneedtoattractexternalcapital.Agencytheorysuggeststhatdividendsmaybeawaytoreducetheoverinvestmentproblemorameanstokeepfirmsinthecapitalmarkets.Dividendsmayalsobeusedtoattractinstitutionalinvestors,whoarebettermonitorsandpreferdividendsforregulatoryreasons.Behavioralaspects,suchasself-control,fairness,orregretaversion,mayalsobeimportantpartsofthepicture.

Eachofthemaintheoriesconcerningdividendpolicyhasfoundatleastsome

supportinactualdata.However,empiricalresearchhasalsorevealedweaknessesoftheseexplanations,andabroadconsensusconcerningthe“best”theoryofcorporate

payoutseemsfaraway.Wemayknowmoreaboutthe“dividendpuzzle”,butweare

stillwithoutadefinitesolution.

ThepresentpaperexaminessomeofthecharacteristicsofdividendpolicyusingSwissdata.Thefirstpartpresentsfactorsthatinfluencevariationsindividendpaymentsacrosscompaniesatagivenpointintime.Thesecondpartanalyzesthechangesindividendsovertime.

Thecross-sectionalanalysisforthe2000–2003periodscomparesthe

characteristicsofdividendpayersandnon-payers.Itthenidentifiesseveraldeterminantsofthedifferencesbetweendividendpayersintermsofpayoutratiosanddividendyields.Theresultsshowthatcompaniesthatarelessrisky,larger,withlowergrowthopportunities,andwithlowerleveragetendtopayhigherdividends.Institutionsshowapreferencefordividend-payingcompanies,butthereislittleevidencethattheypreferhigherpayoutratiosordividendyields.

Quiteinterestingly,thefactorthatturnsouttohavethestrongestinfluenceonpayoutratiosanddividendyieldsispricevolatility.Thismaybeinterpretedasasignthatcompanieswithhigherearningsuncertaintyarelesslikelytopayhighdividends-ortopaydividendsatall.

Dividendspersharearemuchmorewidespreadasaheadlineindicatorofdividendpolicy.Thefinalsectionofthepaperlooksatchangesin(split-adjusted)dividendspershareandseekstodeterminewhetherthesechangeshaveinformationalcontent.Theresultsshowthatdividendincreasesfollowperiodsofhighearningsand

cashflowgrowth,whereasdividenddecreasesfollowdeclines.

Acloserlookatthedatarevealsthattheremayneverthelessbesomeinformationconveyedbydividendchanges.Theaveragefuturelevelofearningsafterdividendincreasesissignificantlyhigherthanthemeanoverthepreviousfewyears.Theearningsofcompaniesthatdecreasethedividenddeclineslightlyandremainatapersistentlylowlevelaroundthedividendchange.

Animportantclassofmodelsisbasedontheideathattheassumptionofperfect

informationmaybeunrealisticandthatdividendscanbeusedassignalsoffirmquality.Bhattacharya(1979)buildsatwo-periodmodelwithtwotypesoffirms.Investmentsaremadeduringthefirstperiod;

theirexpectedprofitabilityisknowntomanagement,butnottooutsideinvestors.Inordertosignalthequalityoftheirinvestment,themanagersof“good”firms(managersareassumedtoactintheinterestofinitialshareholders)willcommittopayinghighdividendsinthesecondperiod.Sinceattractingoutsidefinancing(duringthesecondperiod)isexpensiveduetotransactioncosts,“low-quality”firmswillbeunabletoimitate“high-quality”ones.

ThealternativemodelsofMillerandRock(1985)andJohnandWilliams(1985)considerthecostofdividendsintermsofforegoneinvestmentsandtaxes,respectively.

Thesignalingmodelsprovideanexplanationforthepositivestockpricereactiontotheannouncementofdividendincreasesorinitiations.However,theempiricalevidenceonthishypothesisismixed.Inanearlystudy,Watts(1973)foundthatunexpectedchangesinearningsandunexpectedchangesindividendswererelated,althoughheremainedskepticalaboutthepossibilitytomakemoneybyexploitingthisregularity.Penman(1983)findsthat“bothdividendannouncementsandmanagement’searningsforecastspossessinformationaboutmanagement’sexpectations”.Usingasampleofdividendinitiationsandomissions,Healy(1988)findthatdividendinitiationsandomissionshaveinformationalcontent(thechangeinearningsisrelatedtoannouncement-dayreturns,evenwhencontrollingforpreviousearnings),butthisonlyholdsforyear1.YoonandStarks(1995)andDenisetal(1994)showthatdividendchangeannouncementsarelinkedtorevisionsinanalysts’forecastsofcurrentincome.

Basedonthemixedresultsforthesignalingtheory,Grullonetal(2002)suggestthat,ratherthananincreaseinprofitability,dividendincreasescouldreflectadecreaseinrisk–the“maturityhypothesis”.Theyfindthatwhileprofitabilitydeclinesfollowingadividendincrease,systematicriskinathree-factorFameFrenchmodeldecreases.Theyarguethatasfirmsbecomemoremature(andthereforelessrisky,butwithlowergrowthopportunities),theywillbemorelikelytopaylarge

dividendstotheirshareholders.

Agencytheorysuggeststhatdividendscanbeusedasameanstocontrolafirm’smanagement.Distributingdividendsreducesthefreecashflowproblemandincreasesthemanagement’sequitystake.Easterbrook(1984)alsosuggeststhatdividendscan

beusedtokeepfirmsincapitalmarkets,wheretheyaremonitoredbypotentialinvestors.Thisisusefulsincemonitoringbyexistingshareholderscanbehinderedbycoordinationproblems.Lang(1989)findthatdividendincreasesareassociatedwithhigherpositivesharepricereactionsforcompanieswithTobin’sqsmallerthanunity,

i.e.,forcompanieswithlowergrowthopportunities.

Otherevidence,however,tendstoqualifytheagencyexplanation.Capitalexpendituresincreasefollowingdividendincreases,anddecreasefollowingdividenddecreasesandomissionscomparedtothepreviousaverage(ThisisinlinewiththefindingsofYoonandStarks1995andDenisetal.1994).Moreover,companiesthatincreasedividendshavenothadsignificantlyhigherincreasesincapitalexpenditureovertheprevious2years,whilecompaniesthatomitdividendsshowasignificantslowdownoverthesameperiod.Thus,dividendincreasesdonotfollowaninvestmentboom,whiledividendcutsandomissionsarenotassociatedwithsubsequenthigherinvestmentthatmayindicatebettergrowthopportunities.Cashflowsandcashlevelsfordividend-increasingcompaniesremainatahighlevelandevenincreaseoverthemediumterm.

Dividendsmaythusbecomeinformativeaboutearningsinawaynotenvisagedinclassicalsignalingmodels.Sincemanagerswanttoavoiddividenddecreases,theywillonlyincreasedividendswhentheyarereasonablysurethattherehasbeenasustainableincreaseinearnings.Theywillalsocutoromitdividendsonlywhenthefirm’searningspositionhasdeterioratedconsiderably.Asaresult,adividendincrease

willfollowaperiodofsignificantearningsgrowthandconfirmthatthenew,higherlevelofearningsispersistent.Atthesametime,dividenddecreaseswillfollowaslowdownandconfirmthatthefirmwillstillbeinadifficultpositioninthefuture.Indeed,althoughtheirstudyseriouslychallengestheroleofdividendchangesasasignalforfutureearnings,Benartzietal.(1997)findthatearningsarelesslikelyto

decreasefollowingdividendincreases.

ThepaperhasexaminedseveralfeaturesofdividendpolicyforasampleofSwisscompanies.Cross-sectionalcomparisonsshownegativerelationshipsbetweendividendpaymentsandmarket-to-bookratios,pricevolatility,andleverage,aswellaspositiverelationshipswithprofitabilityand(toalesserextent)firmsizeandinstitutionalholdings.Ownershipconcentrationdoesnotseemtohavesignificanteffects.Companiesthatusedrepurchasesovertherecentyearswereriskierandlessprofitablethancompanieschoosingdividends.Whilesomeoftheserelationshipsareexpectable,thenegativerelationshipbetweenleverageanddividendpayments,theweakinfluenceofownershipstructure,thestronginfluenceofpricevolatility,andthecontrastbetweendividendsandrepurchasesarenotobviousresultsinthelightoftheoryandpreviousempiricalstudiesandthusareimportantaspectstonote.

Signalingmodelssuggestthatdividendchangespredictfutureprofitability.Still,theanalysisofthedataindicatesthatwhendividendsincrease,earningshavealreadyincreased.Therearenoobvioussignsoffastergrowth

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > PPT模板 > 国外设计风格

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1