物理类专业英语大作业Word格式.docx
《物理类专业英语大作业Word格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《物理类专业英语大作业Word格式.docx(7页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
201201020118
院(系):
理学院
专业班级:
物理1201
任课教师:
温俊清
完成时间:
2014年12月28日
Newton'
slawsofmotion
slawsofmotionarethreephysicallawsthattogetherlaidthefoundationforclassicalmechanics.Theydescribetherelationshipbetweenabodyandtheforcesactinguponit,anditsmotioninresponsetosaidforces.Theyhavebeenexpressedinseveraldifferentwaysovernearlythreecenturies,andcanbesummarisedasfollows.
Firstlaw:
Whenviewedinaninertialreferenceframe,anobjecteitherremainsatrestorcontinuestomoveataconstantvelocity,unlessacteduponbyanexternalforce.
Secondlaw:
ThevectorsumoftheforcesFonanobjectisequaltothemassmofthatobjectmultipliedbytheaccelerationvectoraoftheobject:
F=ma.
Thirdlaw:
Whenonebodyexertsaforceonasecondbody,thesecondbodysimultaneouslyexertsaforceequalinmagnitudeandoppositeindirectiononthefirstbody.
ThethreelawsofmotionwerefirstcompiledbyIsaacNewtoninhisPhilosophiNaturalisPrincipiaMathematica(MathematicalPrinciplesofNaturalPhilosophy),firstpublishedin1687.Newtonusedthemtoexplainandinvestigatethemotionofmanyphysicalobjectsandsystems.Forexample,inthethirdvolumeofthetext,Newtonshowedthattheselawsofmotion,combinedwithhislawofuniversalgravitation,explainedKepler'
slawsofplanetarymotion.
Overview
slawsareappliedtoobjectswhichareidealisedassinglepointmasses,inthesensethatthesizeandshapeoftheobject'
sbodyareneglectedtofocusonitsmotionmoreeasily.Thiscanbedonewhentheobjectissmallcomparedtothedistancesinvolvedinitsanalysis,orthedeformationandrotationofthebodyareofnoimportance.Inthisway,evenaplanetcanbeidealisedasaparticleforanalysisofitsorbitalmotionaroundastar.
Intheiroriginalform,Newton'
slawsofmotionarenotadequatetocharacterisethemotionofrigidbodiesanddeformablebodies.LeonhardEulerin1750introducedageneralisationofNewton'
slawsofmotionforrigidbodiescalledtheEuler'
slawsofmotion,laterappliedaswellfordeformablebodiesassumedasacontinuum.Ifabodyisrepresentedasanassemblageofdiscreteparticles,eachgovernedbyNewton'
slawsofmotion,thenEuler'
slawscanbederivedfromNewton'
slaws.Euler'
slawscan,however,betakenasaxiomsdescribingthelawsofmotionforextendedbodies,independentlyofanyparticlestructure.
slawsholdonlywithrespecttoacertainsetofframesofreferencecalledNewtonianorinertialreferenceframes.Someauthorsinterpretthefirstlawasdefiningwhataninertialreferenceframeis;
fromthispointofview,thesecondlawonlyholdswhentheobservationismadefromaninertialreferenceframe,andthereforethefirstlawcannotbeprovedasaspecialcaseofthesecond.Otherauthorsdotreatthefirstlawasacorollaryofthesecond.TheexplicitconceptofaninertialframeofreferencewasnotdevelopeduntillongafterNewton'
sdeath.
Inthegiveninterpretationmass,acceleration,momentum,and(mostimportantly)forceareassumedtobeexternallydefinedquantities.Thisisthemostcommon,butnottheonlyinterpretationofthewayonecanconsiderthelawstobeadefinitionofthesequantities.
Newtonianmechanicshasbeensupersededbyspecialrelativity,butitisstillusefulasanapproximationwhenthespeedsinvolvedaremuchslowerthanthespeedoflight.
sfirstlaw
Thefirstlawstatesthatifthenetforceiszero,thenthevelocityoftheobjectisconstant.Velocityisavectorquantitywhichexpressesboththeobject'
sspeedandthedirectionofitsmotion;
therefore,thestatementthattheobject'
svelocityisconstantisastatementthatbothitsspeedandthedirectionofitsmotionareconstant.
Thefirstlawcanbestatedmathematicallyas
Consequently,
∙Anobjectthatisatrestwillstayatrestunlessanexternalforceactsuponit.
∙Anobjectthatisinmotionwillnotchangeitsvelocityunlessanexternalforceactsuponit.
Thisisknownasuniformmotion.Anobjectcontinuestodowhateverithappenstobedoingunlessaforceisexerteduponit.Ifitisatrest,itcontinuesinastateofrest(demonstratedwhenatableclothisskilfullywhippedfromunderdishesonatabletopandthedishesremainintheirinitialstateofrest).Ifanobjectismoving,itcontinuestomovewithoutturningorchangingitsspeed.Thisisevidentinspaceprobesthatcontinuallymoveinouterspace.Changesinmotionmustbeimposedagainstthetendencyofanobjecttoretainitsstateofmotion.Intheabsenceofnetforces,amovingobjecttendstomovealongastraightlinepathindefinitely.
Newtonplacedthefirstlawofmotiontoestablishframesofreferenceforwhichtheotherlawsareapplicable.ThefirstlawofmotionpostulatestheexistenceofatleastoneframeofreferencecalledaNewtonianorinertialreferenceframe,relativetowhichthemotionofaparticlenotsubjecttoforcesisastraightlineataconstantspeed.Newton'
sfirstlawisoftenreferredtoasthelawofinertia.Thus,aconditionnecessaryfortheuniformmotionofaparticlerelativetoaninertialreferenceframeisthatthetotalnetforceactingonitiszero.Inthissense,thefirstlawcanberestatedas:
Ineverymaterialuniverse,themotionofaparticleinapreferentialreferenceframeфisdeterminedbytheactionofforceswhosetotalvanishedforalltimeswhenandonlywhenthevelocityoftheparticleisconstantinф.Thatis,aparticleinitiallyatrestorinuniformmotioninthepreferentialframeфcontinuesinthatstateunlesscompelledbyforcestochangeit.
slawsarevalidonlyinaninertialreferenceframe.Anyreferenceframethatisinuniformmotionwithrespecttoaninertialframeisalsoaninertialframe,i.e.GalileaninvarianceortheprincipleofNewtonianrelativity.
ssecondlaw
Thesecondlawstatesthatthenetforceonanobjectisequaltotherateofchangeofitslinearmomentumpinaninertialreferenceframe:
Thesecondlawcanalsobestatedintermsofanobject'
sacceleration.SinceNewton'
ssecondlawisonlyvalidforconstant-masssystems,masscanbetakenoutsidethedifferentiationoperatorbytheconstantfactorruleindifferentiation.Thus,
whereFisthenetforceapplied,misthemassofthebody,andaisthebody'
sacceleration.Thus,thenetforceappliedtoabodyproducesaproportionalacceleration.Inotherwords,ifabodyisaccelerating,thenthereisaforceonit.
Consistentwiththefirstlaw,thetimederivativeofthemomentumisnon-zerowhenthemomentumchangesdirection,evenifthereisnochangeinitsmagnitude;
suchisthecasewithuniformcircularmotion.Therelationshipalsoimpliestheconservationofmomentum:
whenthenetforceonthebodyiszero,themomentumofthebodyisconstant.Anynetforceisequaltotherateofchangeofthemomentum.
Anymassthatisgainedorlostbythesystemwillcauseachangeinmomentumthatisnottheresultofanexternalforce.Adifferentequationisnecessaryforvariable-masssystems.
ssecondlawrequiresmodificationiftheeffectsofspecialrelativityaretobetakenintoaccount,becauseathighspeedstheapproximationthatmomentumistheproductofrestmassandvelocityisnotaccurate.
sthirdlaw
Thethirdlawstatesthatallforcesexistinpairs:
ifoneobjectAexertsaforceFAonasecondobjectB,thenBsimultaneouslyexertsaforceFBonA,andthetwoforcesareequalandopposite:
FA=−FB.Thethirdlawmeansthatallforcesareinteractionsbetweendifferentbodies,andthusthatthereisnosuchthingasaunidirectionalforceoraforcethatactsononlyonebody.Thislawissometimesreferredtoastheaction-reactionlaw,withFAcalledthe"
action"
andFBthe"
reaction"
.Theactionandthereactionaresimultaneous,anditdoesnotmatterwhichiscalledtheactionandwhichiscalledreaction;
bothforcesarepartofasingleinteraction,andneitherforceexistswithouttheother.
ThetwoforcesinNewton'
sthirdlawareofthesametype(e.g.,iftheroadexertsaforwardfrictionalforceonanacceleratingcar'
stires,thenitisalsoafrictionalforcethatNewton'
sthirdlawpredictsforthetirespushingbackwardontheroad).
Fromaconceptualstandpoint,Newton'
sthirdlawisseenwhenapersonwalks:
theypushagainstthefloor,andthefloorpushesagainsttheperson.Similarly,thetiresofacarpushagainsttheroadwhiletheroadpushesbackonthetires—thetiresandroadsimultaneouslypushagainsteachother.Inswimming,apersoninteractswiththewater,pushingthewaterbackward,whilethewatersimultaneouslypushesthepersonforward—boththepersonandthewaterpushagainsteachother.Thereactionforcesaccountforthemotionintheseexamples.Theseforcesdependonfriction;
apersonorcaronice,forexample,maybeunabletoexerttheactionforcetoproducetheneededreactionforce.
Importanceandrangeofvalidity
slawswereverifiedbyexperimentandobservationforover200years,andtheyareexcellentapproximationsatthescalesandspeedsofeverydaylife.Newton'
slawsofmotion,togetherwithhislawofuniversalgravitationandthemathematicaltechniquesofcalculus,providedforthefirsttimeaunifiedquantitativeexplanationforawiderangeofphysicalphenomena.
Thesethreelawsholdtoagoodapproximationformacroscopicobjectsundereverydayconditions.However,Newton'
slawsareinappropriateforuseincertaincircumstances,mostnotablyatverysmallscales,veryhighspeedsorverystronggravitationalfields.Therefore,thelawscannotbeusedtoexplainph