连带保证期间和诉讼时效Joint and several guaranty period and limitation of actionWord格式.docx

连带保证期间和诉讼时效Joint and several guaranty period and limitation of actionWord格式.docx

《连带保证期间和诉讼时效Joint and several guaranty period and limitation of actionWord格式.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《连带保证期间和诉讼时效Joint and several guaranty period and limitation of actionWord格式.docx（12页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

First,thesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweentheguarantyperiodandthelimitationperiodofthesuretyshipobligation

Thecurrent"

guaranteelaw"

articlefifteenth,twenty-fifth,twenty-sixthtoensurethesettingandvalidityperiodhasdefinedthe"

guaranteecontractshallincludethefollowingcontents:

"

warrantyperiod"

（15）"

generalguaranteetheguarantorandthecreditorisnotstipulatedintheguaranteeperiod,guaranteeperiodforperformanceoftheprincipaldebtsixmonthsfromthedateofexpirationofguarantee;

thecontractandtheprovisionsmentionedintheprecedingparagraphduringthewarrantyperiod,theobligeehasfiledalawsuitorappliedforarbitrationtothedebtor,thesuretyshallberelievedofthesuretyshipliability;

thecreditorhasfiledalawsuitorarbitration,toensurethattheprovisionsapplicableduringtheactioninterrupted"

（twenty-fifth）:

"

jointresponsibilitytoensurethattheguarantorandthecreditordoesnotguaranteeagreementduringtheperiod,thecreditorshallhavetherighttoowndebttocalltheguaranteewithinsixmonthsfromthedateofmaturity;

intheperiodofguaranteecontractIfthecreditordoesnotrequiretheguarantortoundertakethesuretyshipliabilityduringtheguarantyperiodstipulatedintheprecedingparagraphandtheprecedingparagraph,theguarantorshallbeexemptedfromthesuretyshipliability."

Itisnotdifficulttoseethattheguaranteeperiodreferstothecreditorshallhavetherighttoexercisetherighttoguaranteethetimelimit,thewarrantyperiodandalthoughthelimitationofactionhasclosetothesameeffect,aftertheperiodcanbeexemptedfromtheresponsibilityoftheguarantor,andhavetoactivelyurgecreditorstoexercisetheirrights,butthedifferencesbetweenthemandthelimitationofactionisobviouslythe.Specifically:

1.Theobjectoftheguarantyperiodisdifferentfromtheperiodoflimitationofaction.

Intherelationshipbetweentheguarantorandthecreditor,theguarantorofthecreditoristoguaranteethedebtburden,correspondingtocreditorsofthesuretyshallenjoytheguaranteeofcreditor'

srights,thecreditorhastheparticularity,theguarantortoensurepromisedinthecontractobligationstocreditorsislookingforwardtotheright,doesnothavepracticaleffect.Inotherwords,thecreditorhastheeffectofstartingthecreditor'

srightonlyaftertheprincipalhasfulfilledthepaymentrequirementtotheguarantoraftertheexpirationoftheprincipalobligation.Asfarastheclaimofgeneralcreditor'

srightsisconcerned,thedebtorhastheobligationtoperformthepaymentaslongasthetermoftheperformanceofthedebtexpires.

Theguaranteeperiodissetuptoensuretheinterestsofthepeople,aseveryoneknows,theguarantorinensuringthemaindebtrelationshiponlyobligationswithoutrights,theguaranteeperiodisthevalueofmaintainingtheoriginalstateoffacts（i.e.,creditorsareentitledtoclaimandexercisethedenialofreality）,theoriginalstateoffacttherighttermlimits,andthisrightiscalledtherightofformation,itsexerciseformrealisticdebtrelationshipbetweenthetwoparties,toensuretheclaimofcreditor'

srightstobeestablished.

Inessence,theauthorbelievesthattheguaranteeperiodisaimedattheexerciseperiodofthecreditor'

srightofformation.

Generallyspeaking,actionfromtherighttorequesttherighttoexercisewhentheobligeetoexercisetherightofclaim,objectively,mustberightinfringement;

fromasubjectivepointofview,therightpeoplemustknoworshouldknowtheinfringement.Therefore,the137thclauseofthegeneralprinciplesofcivillawstipulatesthatthelimitationperiodofactionshallbecalculatedfromknowingorknowingthattherightshavebeeninfringed."

China'

scivillawonthelimitationofactionisthepossibilityoftheconsequencesofthelossofonlyrequestacourttoenforcetheprotectionoftheirrights,buttherealrightitselfstillexists,therighttobecomeanaturalobligation,notinthescopeoflawenforcement.Whenthecreditorrequeststheguarantortoperformthepaymentandtheguarantorfailstoperformhisobligationswithintheguarantyperiod,heentersthelimitationperiodofthesuretyshipobligation.

2,guaranteeperiodandguaranteedebtlimitationperiodisdifferent.

Duringthe"

securitylaw"

provisionsoftheguaranteeagreementandduringtheguaranteeperiodisdividedintolegalguarantee,legalguaranteeperiodissixmonths,butthisisjustanarbitrarynorm,ifthepartiesagreedperiodisdifferentfromthestatutoryperiod,fromitsagreement.Duringtheperiodofguarantee,norestrictionsareimposed,whichmakesithappeninpractice:

thepartiesagreetheguarantor'

ssuretyshipliabilityuntilthedebtorfinishestheperformanceofthemaincontract.Thatis,theprincipaldebtorrelievestheperformanceofthemaincontract.Iftheprincipaldebtisnotextinguished,theguarantormustbeartheguaranteeresponsibilityforever.Thisiscontrarytothelegislativepurposeofestablishmentofguaranteeagreementduringtheperiodofguaranteevalueistomaintaintheoriginalstateoffact,termdefinitiononrightsofcreditors,promotingtheexerciseassoonaspossiblethatthelawiswillingtohopetoseeanearlyperformanceofdebt.

WhatisthisAgreementasthereisnoagreementortheagreementisnotclear,inaccordancewiththelawforsixmonths,orinaccordancewiththeagreedperiodtoolongovertimetheprincipaldebtlitigationfortwoyears,Itendtothinkthatduringmorethantwoyears,asduringthepartieshavenotagreedthatshouldapplythestatutoryguaranteeperiodofsixmonths.Ifthepartiesagreethattheguaranteeperiodisconsistentwiththeperformanceperiodoftheprincipaldebt,itshouldalsoberegardedasnoagreement,andtheguarantyperiodshouldbedeterminedaccordingtothestatutoryperiodofsixmonths,soastoprotecttheinterestsofthecreditors.

Onthelimitationofdebtguarantee,this"

didnotmakespecialprovisions,itshallapplytothe"

generalprovisionsofthecivillaw"

oftheperiodoflimitationofaction,toensurethatduringtheperiodoflimitationofactionforthegenerallimitationoftwoyears.

3,theguaranteeperiodisdifferentfromthestartingpointofthelimitationperiod.

Theguarantylawstipulatestwoformsofguarantee,namelygeneralguaranteeandjointandseveralliabilityguarantee.Thestartingpointbeginswiththemaindebtdischargeperiodexpires,however,duetothegeneralguaranteeissupplementary,thesuretyshallenjoytherightofdefenseretrieval（alsocalledbeneficiumexcussionis）,whichisinthemaindebtdisputeswithouttrialorarbitration,andthedebtor'

spropertylawenforcementisstillunabletoperformthedebt,theguarantormayrefusetoassumeresponsibilityforcreditors.Inthisway,thecreditorrequeststheguarantortoperformthepaymentaftertheexpirationoftheprincipaldebt,andtheactwillbeblockedbytheguarantor'

srighttoexercisetherighttosearch.Thecreditorsinthemaincontractdisputesthroughtrialorarbitration,andthedebtor'

spropertyaccordingtolawenforcementandthenrequesttheguarantortoperformbenefitmayexceedtheguaranteeperiod,ifthecreditorsduetotheexpirationoftheperiodofguaranteethatthelossofguarantorstoclaimpayment,unfair,therefore,specialprovisionsofthelaw,thecreditorhasthemaincontractlitigationorarbitration,toensurethattheprovisionsapplicableduringtheinterruptionofthelimitationofaction.（thetwenty-fifthparagraphofthesecondactoftheSecurityAct）thestateoftheinterruptioniscontinueduntiltheproceedingsorarbitralproceedingsarecompletedandthedebtor'

spropertyhasbeenenforced.Aftertheinterruptioniscompleted,theguaranteeperiodisrecalculated.

Itisnecessarytoclarifytwopoints:

oneisthattheguaranteeperiodcanbeinterruptedanddiscontinued.Thisiswrong,thelegalguaranteetothegeneralguaranteeduringtheinterruptionofprescriptionshallapplytheprovisionsofthecaseitselfshowsthattheinterruptiondoesnotexistduringthe"

break"

ispreciselytheotherquasilegalsystem（prescription）results;

thejointliabilityguaranteeperioddoesnotexist"

interrupt"

ornot.Thisisbecauseinthejointguarantee,theguarantordoesnotenjoytherightofdefenseinthesearch,thecreditorsintheguaranteeperiodtoensurehumanrightsadvocates,thesignificanceofthisguaranteedurationhadbeencompleted,followedbytheguaranteeddebtdischargeperiodandguaranteethelimitationcalculationproblem.Two,itisalsoamajormisunderstandingthatthecreditorinthejointandseveralsuretyshipliabilityrequirestheguarantortoundertakethesuretyshipliability（twenty-sixtharticles）andonlylimitedtolitigationorarbitration.Thecreditorofjointliabilityguaranteehasthelegalmeaningofformingtherelationshipbetweencreditoranddebtor,exceptforlitigationorarbitration,

Unlikethecreditorinthegeneralguarantor,theclaimofthelawsuitorarbitrationcannotcausethechangeofthelegalrelationshipofbothsidesbecauseoftheexistenceo