大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809Word文件下载.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:20653823 上传时间:2023-01-24 格式:DOCX 页数:11 大小:23.05KB
下载 相关 举报
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809Word文件下载.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共11页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809Word文件下载.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共11页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809Word文件下载.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共11页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809Word文件下载.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共11页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809Word文件下载.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共11页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809Word文件下载.docx

《大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809Word文件下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809Word文件下载.docx(11页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809Word文件下载.docx

Readingskills:

Usecontexttounderstandanewword

Identifycohesivedevices

Predictthecontentofanupcomingsentence/paragraph

Communicativecompetence:

Developacoherentandcohesiveoral/writtendiscourse

Usetopicsentences,supportingsentencesandconcludingsentencesinpresentations/essays

Communicateconstructivelyinteamwork

Criticalthinking:

Evaluatethestrengthsandweaknessesofpersonalexperienceasevidenceinargumentation

Organizetheargumentsusinganoutline

Noteandreflectonthedifferencesbetweenacademicwritingandeverydaywriting

Interculturalreflection

Identifysimilaritiesanddifferencesinnon-verbalcommunicationacrosscultures

Beawareofmultiplelevelsofdifferencesonwhichcross-culturalcommunicationcanfalter

Interpretcommunicationbehaviorsfromculturalandhistoricalperspectives

Teachingstrategies

Non-verbalcommunicationandcross-culturalcommunicationarebothinterestingtopicsinlinguistics.Theteachercanintroducethetwotextsbyquotinganecdotesorrelatingtostudents’ownexperiences(question5inPreparatorywork,p.59).Forstudentswholackexperienceofcross-culturalcommunication,thetopiccanbeledinbydiscussionsaboutinter-subculturalcommunication.

TextAisaresearcharticlefromanacademicjournalanditsstructureandwritingstylearequiteclear.Itisrecommendedtodrawstudents’attentiontotheauthor’slogic(i.e.,waysofarguing)anduseofevidenceinclass.Ifwell-planned,allthequestionsinPreparatoryWorkandCriticalreadingcanbedealtwithinsomedetailinclass.TheteachercanfollowallthequestionsinUnderstandingthetexttocheckstudents’comprehensionofthetext,whilethetasksinEvaluationandexplorationcanbedividedandassignedtogroups.Forexample,inMakinganoutline(p.62),theteachercandividethestudentsintothreegroups,eachresponsibleforonetopic.

Forclassicalworksininterculturalcommunication,pleasereferto:

Hall,EdwardT.(1955).TheAnthropologyofManners.ScientificAmerican,192:

85-89.

Hall,EdwardT.(1959).TheSilentLanguage.NewYork:

Doubleday.

Formoreupdatedinformation,pleasefindthefollowingjournals:

Cross-CulturalCommunicationpublishedbyCanadianAcademyofOrientalandOccidentalCulture(CAOOC)

AcrossLanguagesandCulturespublishedbyAkadé

miaiKiadó

LanguageandInterculturalCommunicationpublishedbyRoutledgeJournals,Taylor&

FrancisLtd.

Preparatorywork

(1)Academicinterests:

genderandlanguage,interactionalsociolinguistics,conversationalinteraction,cross-culturalcommunication,framestheory,conversationalvs.literarydiscourse,andnewmediadiscourse.

(2)

Mainpublications:

YouJustDon'

tUnderstand:

WomenandMeninConversation.NewYork:

Morrow,1990.

That'

sNotWhatIMeant!

:

HowConversationalStyleMakesorBreaksRelationships.NY:

WilliamMorrow,1986.

GenderandDiscourse.NY&

Oxford:

OxfordUniversityPress,1994.

Note:

OutsidetheacademicworldDeborahTannenisbestknownastheauthorof 

anumberofbooksontheNewYorkTimesbestsellerandshe 

isalsoafrequentguestontelevisionandradionewsandinformationshows.

(3)EdwardSapir(1884–1939):

an 

American 

anthropologistwhoiswidelyregardedasoneofthemostimportantfiguresintheearlydevelopmentofmodernlinguistics.Hismaininterestsareinthewaysinwhichlanguageandcultureinfluenceeachother,therelationbetweenlinguisticdifferences,anddifferencesinculturalworldviews.Hismostimportantcontributioniswhatisknownastheprincipleof 

linguisticrelativity 

orthe"

Sapir-Whorf"

hypothesis.

(4)

JohnJosephGumperz(1922–2013):

anAmericanlinguist.HisresearchinterestsincludethelanguagesofIndia,code-switching,andconversationalinteraction.Well-knownforhiscontributionininteractionalsociolinguisticsandthe"

ethnographyofcommunication"

Gumperz’sresearchhasbenefittedsuchfieldsassociolinguistics,discourseanalysis,andlinguisticanthropology.

E.M.Forster(1879–1970):

anEnglishnovelist,shortstorywriter,essayistandlibrettist.Heisknownbestforhisironicandwell-plottednovelsexaminingclassdifferenceandhypocrisyinearly20th-centuryBritishsociety.HewasnominatedfortheNobelPrizeinLiteraturein13differentyears.

RobertKaplan:

AnAmerican 

appliedlinguist.Hisresearchareacoversappliedlinguistics,discourseanalysis,languagepolicy,languageplanning,andESL/EFLTeaching.HeismostfamousforhiscontributioninContrastiveRhetoric,atermhefirstcoinedin1966.Kaplanhasauthoredoredited32books,morethan130articlesinscholarlyjournalsandchaptersinbooks,andmorethan85bookreviewsandotherephemeralpiecesinvariousnewsletters,aswellas9specialreportstotheU.S.governmentandtogovernmentselsewhere.

http:

//dosfan.lib.uic.edu/usia/E-USIA/education/engteaching/kap0299.htm

(5)Pragmaticsisthesystematicstudyofmeaningdependentonlanguageinuse.Unlikesemantics,whichexaminesconventionalmeaning"

coded"

inagivenlanguage,pragmaticsstudieshowthetransmissionofmeaningdependsnotonlyonstructuralandlinguisticknowledge(e.g.,grammar,lexicon,etc.)ofthespeakerandthehearer,butalsoonthecontextoftheutterance,anypre-existingknowledgeaboutthoseparticipantsinvolved,theinferredintentofthespeaker,andotherfactors.Centraltopicsofpragmaticsincludeaspeaker’scommunicativeintentions,theuseoflanguagethatrequiressuchintentions,contextofuse,therelationbetweentheuserofalinguisticformandtheactofusingtheform,andthestrategiesanaddresseeemploystoworkoutwhattheintentionsandactsare.

(6)

(7)Cohesionreferstotheuseofvariousphonological,grammatical,and/orlexicalmeanstolinksentencesorutterancesintoawell-connected,largerlinguisticunitsuchasaparagraphorachapter.Inotherwords,cohesionachieveswell-connectednessbymeansoflinguisticforms.

(8)

Example:

Maryisasecretary.Sheworksinalawfirm.Yan(2012)

Coherencereferstothelogicalwell-connectednessbetweendifferentpartsofapieceofspokenorwrittenlanguage,whichdistinguishesitfromarandomassemblageofsentencesorutterances.Yan(2012)

Formly 

incohesive 

discourse 

may 

be 

coherent 

through 

common 

sense, 

cultural 

background, 

contextual 

information, 

imagination, 

logical 

assumption, 

etc. 

Husband:

That’s 

the 

telephone. 

Wife:

I’m 

in 

bath. 

OK. 

(9)Pauseisatemporaryandbriefbreakintheflowofspeech,whichisoftenclassifiedintofilledpauseandunfilledorsilentpause.Theformeristakenuporfilledbyahesitationformlikeah,er,andum.Incontrast,thelatterisnotfilledbyahesitationform.Inotherwords,asilentpauseisonewherethereisnovocalization.

(10)

Criticalreading

I.Understandingthetext

(1)Themainpurposeofthisarticleistoillustrateeightlevelsofcross-culturaldifferencesinnon-verbalaspectsofcommunication.

(2)Wecanunderstandthenatureoflanguagebyobservingitincommunicationandincontactwithothersystemsofcommunication.

(3)Pacingandpausing,listenership.Indecidingwhentotalkandwhattosay,thespeakerusuallytakesaconsciousspeechplanning,yetinpacingandpausingandinshowinglistenershipinaconversation,onedoesnotneedtostopandthinkforadecision.

(4)Section2.1startswithadirectthesisstatement.Thentheauthorexplainsitwithanexpert’s(Scollon)researchfindingsandexamples.Insection2.2theauthorraisesanumberofquestions(inpara7,9and11)andrespondstothemwithrelevantresearchfindings(Goody’saswell

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 经管营销 > 人力资源管理

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1