SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word格式文档下载.docx

SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word格式文档下载.docx

《SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word格式文档下载.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word格式文档下载.docx（6页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

Respondstothereviewer'

scomments:

Reviewer#1:

1.Responsetocomment:

•（••••简要列出意见）

Response:

核xxx

2.Responsetocomment:

•（••••简要歹U出意见）

000000

逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏

针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：

Weareverysorryforournegligeneeof

Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting

ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat

WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer'

scomments.

Wehavere-writtenhispartaccordingtotheReviewer'

ssuggestion

AsReviewersuggestedthat

ConsideringtheReviewer'

ssuggestion,wehave

最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：

Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments.

Reviewer#2:

同上述

Reviewer#3:

xxxxxx

Otherchanges:

1.Line60-61,thestatementsof“”werecorrectedas

2.Line107,“……”

wasadded

3.Line129,“……”

wasdeleted

Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript.Thesechangeswillnotinflueneethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.

WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewerswarmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwillmeetwithapproval.

Onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions

以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复。

与大家分享

从中可以看出，这位审稿人认真读了文章，提出很多宝贵的意见。

这些意见

分布在文章的各个地方。

我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章。

看到这些意见，

我觉得很感激，不是因为接收文章的原因，而是这些意见能真正有助于提高文章的质量。

从中还看出，回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。

对于回答问题，有的人就是一味反驳，却不加改进。

记得ACSStyleGuide里面说，当审稿人问到问题的，哪怕是他理解错误，

这

也说明作者这么写，其他读者也会理解错误，引起歧义。

因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表达不引起歧义。

因此：

有时间一味反驳，还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。

Reviewers'

comments:

Whilerevisingthescript,itistobesuggestedthatauthorshouldclearlyindicatetheaim&

scopeofthestudyandwhilemakingconclusion,itistobementionedhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposes.Inadditionthefollowingarethefewsuggestions/comments,whichmaybeincludedwhilerevision.

1.Introductionpartfirstparalastline,authormustavoidtowriteambiguousstatementi.e.,muchworkisstillahead,mayindicateproperly.

2.Authorcouldnotdemonstratethereasonwhy,toselecttheorganiccompoundsuchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy?

3.Experimentalpart:

Itisdifficulttounderstandthein-situRAIRSexperimentswithhomemadeliquid-solidRAIRScell.Moredetailedinformationmaybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworkinginthearea.Photographoftheassembledcellmaybeincluded.

4.Thedescriptiongivenfortheexperimentalsetup（page4）canbepresentedbyflowdiagraminstead,asaneasetounderstandthesetup.

5.ReslutsPart（Page6）:

"

COadlayerswithidenticalmonolayercoverages"

themonolayercoverage,isitbeenperformedwithsomeadsorptionmodel?

Further,itwassuggestedthatCO-saturatedPtsurface,butnotmentionedaboutthesaturationexperiments.Isitobtainedafter60minofCObubbling?

6.Page12,2ndpara:

ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4flushing,isitconfirmedbytheEtPypeaks?

Ifso,ithastobementionedclearlyinthepara.Alsointhesamepara,authorreferredforFig.7aand7bbutinthefigures,itdidn'

tappear,onlyfigure7appeared.Ifeelitrefersforfigure7,portionAandB,tobecorrected.Similarly,inthetextreferredthefig2a,2b.etcbutonthefiguresheetitismentionedas2A,2B.etc.tobecorrected.

7.Page14,1stpara:

'

contaminationofthePtsurfacebycorrosionofo-ringsinhighconcentrationEtPy'

butthestatementhasnotbeensupportedbyotherevidence/literature.

COonthePtsurface（figs3&

4）hastobediscussedmoreprecisely.Thisreviewerisunabletofollowthereasonwhytheyshoweddifferentreactivity,isitprincipallyduetotheorganicmoieties,orduetotheimpuritiesofcommerciallyavailablechemicalsoramixedeffect.Ithastobeclearlydemonstrated,however,theonlyexperimentperformedwithCO/water?

CCl4woulddifficulttodescribeitindetail.

9.Theauthortrytorestrainwithrepeatedargumentsinthetexte.g.,page3para

1:

Itwasgeneralizedthat,alsoappearedonpage21firstpara.

10.Captionsofthefiguresaretoolong,thedetaileddescriptionalreadygiveninthetext,hencewouldnotbeincludedhere.Captionsshouldbeshortandcrispy.

DearEditor,

Iquiteappreciateyourfavoriteconsiderationandthereviewer'

insightful

comments.NowIhaverevisedtheJCIS-06-247exactlyaccordingtothereviewer'

comments,andfoundthesecommentsareveryhelpful.Ihopethisrevisioncanmakemypapermoreacceptable.Therevisionswereaddressedpointbypointbelow.

[general]TheobjectiveofthisresearchwasaddedatthebeginningofthethirdparagraphofIntroduction.HowthestudyisusefulforpracticalpurposeswasaddedattheendofConclusionasoneparagraph.

[1]Ambiguousstatementi.e.,“muchworkisstillahead”wasdeleted.

[2]Ethylpyruvatewasusedhereasatypicalcompound（containingtwocarbonylgroups）todemonstratethefeasibilityofusingourdiagnosingtooltodetectlow-coverageCO（comingfromdecarbonylationofEtPy）attheliquid-solidinterface.EtPyisareactantusedinliquid-phasechiralcatalysis,andslightdecompositionofEtPytoadsorbedCOwasreportedtoinflueneethecatalyticperformanee.Inaddition,bystudyingthat,wecandirectlycompareourresultswithpreviousstudies.MoredetailsinthefirstparagraphofSection3.2.

[3]TheIRcellwasdesignedaccordingtotheIRcellsusedbymanyelectrochemicalworkers.Referenceswereadded.AphotowasgivenintheSupportingInformation.

[4]AflowdiagramoftheexperimentalsetupwasgiveninthenewFig.1.

[5]TheCOadsorptionexperimentswereperformedinthesameadsorptionmode,bybubblingCOthroughacleanPtsurfaceindifferentdaystoachievethesamesaturationcoverageofCO.InitialexperimentsindicatedthatgiventheCObubblingratewas0.85cm3/min,COcansaturateonPtafter30-45min.WebubbleCOfor60mintoguaranteethesameCOcoverage.IfwebubbleCOformoretime,orifwe

increasetheCOflowingrateseveraltimes,theCOsaturationcoveragedoesn'

t

change,indicating60minisalreadyenough.AfigureshowingtheCOuptakeasa

functionofbubblingtimewasgivenintheSupportingInformation.

[6]ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCI4wasconfirmedbytheremovingofEtPy

peaks.ThementionofFig.7aand7betc.throughoutthetextwereallcorrected.

[7]ItisknownthatsomesolventssuchasacetonecancorrodetheVitono-ring.

Wesawthedamageofo-ringafterusinghigh-concentrationEtPy.Arefereneetothe

Vitono-ringinformationwasgiven.

[8]Theobservedreactivitytrendisduetoacombinationofbotheffects,withthe

accumulationoforganicmoietiesonPtsurfaceduringnumerousflushingcyclesthe

moreimportantreason.Afewpropersentenceswereaddedtoclaritythispoint.

[9]TherepeatedargumentsinthefirstparagraphinSection4.3weredeleted.

[10]Thetoo-longcaptionsweresignificantlyshortened.

Inall,Ifoundthereviewer'

scommentsarequitehelpful,andIrevisedmypaper

point-by-point.Thankyouandthereviewagainforyourhelp!

结果:

http:

//dx.doi.org/10.1016/jjcis.2006.09.005

欢迎浏览：

OrganicChemistryonSolidSurfaces（Review）

乙Ma,F.Zaera*,SurfaceSceneeReports61（2006）229-281.

ScienceDirectTOP25HottestArticlesinChemistry

//dx.doi.org/10.10167j.surfrep.2006.03.001

Cl修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板

commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle”（ID:

文章稿号）.Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificaneetoourresearches.Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval.Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper.Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewercommentsareasflowing:

针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用:

Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting

ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat

WehaverewrittenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer'

1.Line60-61,thestatementsof“”werecorrectedas

Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthe

manuscript.Thesechangeswillnotinflueneethecontentandframeworkofthe

paper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.

WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewerswarmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwillmee