2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx
《2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx(98页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
Chapter2,ConversationalImplicature会话含义,2.1Conversationalimplicature2.2CooperativePrinciple(Grice)Neo-Griceantheories2.3Relevancetheory(SperberandWilson)2.4TheQ-andR-principles(Horn)2.5TheQ-,I-andM-principles(Levinson),2.1Conversationalimplicature,Whatisthemeaningofthefollowingsentence:
Isthisyourpen?
theownershipofapen(aquestion)MayIuseyourpen?
(arequest)Youveleftbehindyourpen.(areminder)Pickitup.(anorder),Whendoesthefollowingsentencemakessense?
Childrenarechildren.Twokindofmeanings:
(Stevenson,1963)1.DescriptiveorConventionalmeaning2.PsychologicalorPragmaticmeaning,Gricesanalysisofmeaningandintention:
Thereisacloserelationshipbetweenthenotionofmeaningandthenotionofintention.Inspeakingalanguage,thespeakerattemptstocommunicatethingstohishearerbygettingthehearertorecognizethespeakersintentiontocommunicatejustthosethings.Thereisadistinctionbetweenwhatissaidandwhatisimplicated,Thetheoryofconversationalimplicatureisthesecondmajortheoryinpragmatics.HerbertPaulGricebegantoformulatehisideasofthistheoryinthefifties.Hedeliveredlectures-theWilliamJamesLecturesatHarvardin1967.Partofthelectures“LogicandConversation”waspublishedin1975.,2.2.CooperativePrinciple(Grice),CooperativePrinciple(CP)Makeyourconversationalcontributionsuchasisrequired,atthestageatwhichitoccurs,bytheacceptedpurposeordirectionofthetalkexchangeinwhichyouareengaged.使你说的话符合你所参与的交谈的公认的目的或方向-Grice(1975),Fourmaxims,QuantityMaxim数量准则1)Makeyourcontributionasinformativeasisrequired(forthecurrentpurposesoftheexchange).使自己所说的话达到交谈的现实目的所要求的详尽程度2)Donotmakeyourcontributionmoreinformativethanisrequired.自己所说的话不能比所要求的更详尽,QuantityMaximleadstoHumor,Gary:
Howwasyourfightwithyourwife?
Dustin:
Shecamecrawlingtomeonherhandsandknees.Gary:
Isthatso?
Whatdidshesaytoyou?
Dustin:
Shesaid,“Comeoutfromunderthebedandfightlikeaman!
”,QualityMaxim质量准则Trytomakeourcontributiononethatistrue.所说的话是真的1)Donotsaywhatyoubelievetobefalse.不说自己认为是不真实的话2)Donotsaythatforwhichyoulackadequateevidence.不说自己缺乏足够证据的话,QualityMaximleadstoHumor,Amanwaitedoverthreehourstogreethisnephewattheairport.Theuncle:
WhenwillflightC1308arrive?
Imnervousbecauseitsmynephewsfirstflight.Iwanttomakesurehessafe.Airlineworker:
Howoldistheboy?
Theuncle:
Hewassixyearsoldwhenheleft!
RelationMaxim关联准则Berelevant.说话要贴切MannerMaxim方式准则Beperspicuous:
1)Avoidobscurityofexpression避免晦涩词语2)Avoidambiguity避免歧异3)Bebrief说话要简要(避免赘述)4)Beorderly说话要有条理,RelationMaximleadstoHumor,Customer:
Whatisthisflydoinginmysoup?
Waiter:
Itlookslikehesdoingthebackstroke.儿子:
爸爸,今天晚上我能用你的汽车吗?
父亲:
孩子,你长着两条腿是干什么用的?
儿子:
一条踩油门,另一条踩刹车。
MannerMaximleadstoHumor,(Inthemiddleofabusystreet)Woman:
Officer,canyoutellmehowtogettothehospital?
Policeman:
Juststandwhereyouare.,ViolationofCP,BUThowcanGriceexplainwhywefrequentlyviolatetheCooperativePrinciple?
Gricewouldclaimthat:
EvenifpeopledontseemtobefollowingthemaximsoftheCooperativePrinciple,theyarefollowing(严格遵守)theCPatsomedeeperlevel!
4possiblesituationswhereCPcanbeviolatedquietlyandunostentatiouslyviolateCP(mostlikelytomislead)optout(e.g.Icantsaymore.Mylipsaresealed.)faceadilemma(e.g.fulfillthequalitymaximbutviolatethequantitymaxim:
-WheredoesClive?
-SomewhereinthesouthofFrance.)flout(deliberatelyviolate)amaximbutdonotmislead,Thefourthcasecanmostlikelytogenerateconversationalimplictures.ThespeakerobservesCPonthewhole,buthedeliberatelyfailstofulfillcertainmaximsinordertogenerateconversationalimplicature.Whatissaiddiffersfromwhatisimplicated.Amaximisbeingexploited.Othermeaningshavebeenconceivedonotherdeeperlevels.,DefaultinterpretationSolongasthehearerassumesthatthespeakeriscooperative,hewillgoontryingtofindthemostappropriatemeaningtotheseeminglyuntrue,irrelevantutterancesbythespeaker.-G.Leech(1983).,Examples,A:
WheresBill?
B:
TheresayellowVWoutsideSueshouse.Thisseemstoviolatethequalitymaximsandrelationmaxim,but.WeinterpretBsutteranceasstillbeingcooperative.,WeassumeBisbeingcooperative.Weasktheconnectionbetween1)Billslocation;and2)thelocationofayellowVW.Wearriveatthesuggestionthat,ifBillhasayellowVW,hemaybeinSueshouse.InferencescontrarytothesurfacearewhatGricecalls“conversationalimplicatures”!
Iftheconversationsparticipantsarefollowingmostofthemaxims,thespeakermaystillrequestthatthehearermakebasicinferences.Theonlypurposeofanyviolationmaybeinthenameofefficiency.Inthefollowingexample,maximsseemtobeviolated(atthesurfacelevel).,A:
(topasserby):
Ivejustrunoutofpetrol.B:
Oh;theresagaragejustaroundthecorner.(violationofrelation