2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx

上传人:wj 文档编号:124757 上传时间:2022-10-03 格式:PPTX 页数:98 大小:311.88KB
下载 相关 举报
2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx_第1页
第1页 / 共98页
2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx_第2页
第2页 / 共98页
2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx_第3页
第3页 / 共98页
2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx_第4页
第4页 / 共98页
2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx_第5页
第5页 / 共98页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx

《2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx(98页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

2.-conversational-implicature会话含义.pptx

Chapter2,ConversationalImplicature会话含义,2.1Conversationalimplicature2.2CooperativePrinciple(Grice)Neo-Griceantheories2.3Relevancetheory(SperberandWilson)2.4TheQ-andR-principles(Horn)2.5TheQ-,I-andM-principles(Levinson),2.1Conversationalimplicature,Whatisthemeaningofthefollowingsentence:

Isthisyourpen?

theownershipofapen(aquestion)MayIuseyourpen?

(arequest)Youveleftbehindyourpen.(areminder)Pickitup.(anorder),Whendoesthefollowingsentencemakessense?

Childrenarechildren.Twokindofmeanings:

(Stevenson,1963)1.DescriptiveorConventionalmeaning2.PsychologicalorPragmaticmeaning,Gricesanalysisofmeaningandintention:

Thereisacloserelationshipbetweenthenotionofmeaningandthenotionofintention.Inspeakingalanguage,thespeakerattemptstocommunicatethingstohishearerbygettingthehearertorecognizethespeakersintentiontocommunicatejustthosethings.Thereisadistinctionbetweenwhatissaidandwhatisimplicated,Thetheoryofconversationalimplicatureisthesecondmajortheoryinpragmatics.HerbertPaulGricebegantoformulatehisideasofthistheoryinthefifties.Hedeliveredlectures-theWilliamJamesLecturesatHarvardin1967.Partofthelectures“LogicandConversation”waspublishedin1975.,2.2.CooperativePrinciple(Grice),CooperativePrinciple(CP)Makeyourconversationalcontributionsuchasisrequired,atthestageatwhichitoccurs,bytheacceptedpurposeordirectionofthetalkexchangeinwhichyouareengaged.使你说的话符合你所参与的交谈的公认的目的或方向-Grice(1975),Fourmaxims,QuantityMaxim数量准则1)Makeyourcontributionasinformativeasisrequired(forthecurrentpurposesoftheexchange).使自己所说的话达到交谈的现实目的所要求的详尽程度2)Donotmakeyourcontributionmoreinformativethanisrequired.自己所说的话不能比所要求的更详尽,QuantityMaximleadstoHumor,Gary:

Howwasyourfightwithyourwife?

Dustin:

Shecamecrawlingtomeonherhandsandknees.Gary:

Isthatso?

Whatdidshesaytoyou?

Dustin:

Shesaid,“Comeoutfromunderthebedandfightlikeaman!

”,QualityMaxim质量准则Trytomakeourcontributiononethatistrue.所说的话是真的1)Donotsaywhatyoubelievetobefalse.不说自己认为是不真实的话2)Donotsaythatforwhichyoulackadequateevidence.不说自己缺乏足够证据的话,QualityMaximleadstoHumor,Amanwaitedoverthreehourstogreethisnephewattheairport.Theuncle:

WhenwillflightC1308arrive?

Imnervousbecauseitsmynephewsfirstflight.Iwanttomakesurehessafe.Airlineworker:

Howoldistheboy?

Theuncle:

Hewassixyearsoldwhenheleft!

RelationMaxim关联准则Berelevant.说话要贴切MannerMaxim方式准则Beperspicuous:

1)Avoidobscurityofexpression避免晦涩词语2)Avoidambiguity避免歧异3)Bebrief说话要简要(避免赘述)4)Beorderly说话要有条理,RelationMaximleadstoHumor,Customer:

Whatisthisflydoinginmysoup?

Waiter:

Itlookslikehesdoingthebackstroke.儿子:

爸爸,今天晚上我能用你的汽车吗?

父亲:

孩子,你长着两条腿是干什么用的?

儿子:

一条踩油门,另一条踩刹车。

MannerMaximleadstoHumor,(Inthemiddleofabusystreet)Woman:

Officer,canyoutellmehowtogettothehospital?

Policeman:

Juststandwhereyouare.,ViolationofCP,BUThowcanGriceexplainwhywefrequentlyviolatetheCooperativePrinciple?

Gricewouldclaimthat:

EvenifpeopledontseemtobefollowingthemaximsoftheCooperativePrinciple,theyarefollowing(严格遵守)theCPatsomedeeperlevel!

4possiblesituationswhereCPcanbeviolatedquietlyandunostentatiouslyviolateCP(mostlikelytomislead)optout(e.g.Icantsaymore.Mylipsaresealed.)faceadilemma(e.g.fulfillthequalitymaximbutviolatethequantitymaxim:

-WheredoesClive?

-SomewhereinthesouthofFrance.)flout(deliberatelyviolate)amaximbutdonotmislead,Thefourthcasecanmostlikelytogenerateconversationalimplictures.ThespeakerobservesCPonthewhole,buthedeliberatelyfailstofulfillcertainmaximsinordertogenerateconversationalimplicature.Whatissaiddiffersfromwhatisimplicated.Amaximisbeingexploited.Othermeaningshavebeenconceivedonotherdeeperlevels.,DefaultinterpretationSolongasthehearerassumesthatthespeakeriscooperative,hewillgoontryingtofindthemostappropriatemeaningtotheseeminglyuntrue,irrelevantutterancesbythespeaker.-G.Leech(1983).,Examples,A:

WheresBill?

B:

TheresayellowVWoutsideSueshouse.Thisseemstoviolatethequalitymaximsandrelationmaxim,but.WeinterpretBsutteranceasstillbeingcooperative.,WeassumeBisbeingcooperative.Weasktheconnectionbetween1)Billslocation;and2)thelocationofayellowVW.Wearriveatthesuggestionthat,ifBillhasayellowVW,hemaybeinSueshouse.InferencescontrarytothesurfacearewhatGricecalls“conversationalimplicatures”!

Iftheconversationsparticipantsarefollowingmostofthemaxims,thespeakermaystillrequestthatthehearermakebasicinferences.Theonlypurposeofanyviolationmaybeinthenameofefficiency.Inthefollowingexample,maximsseemtobeviolated(atthesurfacelevel).,A:

(topasserby):

Ivejustrunoutofpetrol.B:

Oh;theresagaragejustaroundthecorner.(violationofrelation

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 自然科学 > 天文地理

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1