Chinas Class Structure in the World System Perspective.docx

上传人:b****7 文档编号:10315966 上传时间:2023-02-10 格式:DOCX 页数:15 大小:25.95KB
下载 相关 举报
Chinas Class Structure in the World System Perspective.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共15页
Chinas Class Structure in the World System Perspective.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共15页
Chinas Class Structure in the World System Perspective.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共15页
Chinas Class Structure in the World System Perspective.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共15页
Chinas Class Structure in the World System Perspective.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共15页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

Chinas Class Structure in the World System Perspective.docx

《Chinas Class Structure in the World System Perspective.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Chinas Class Structure in the World System Perspective.docx(15页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

Chinas Class Structure in the World System Perspective.docx

ChinasClassStructureintheWorldSystemPerspective

 

TheRiseofChinaandtheAgeofTransition

 

Dr.MinqiLi,AssistantProfessor

DepartmentofEconomics,UniversityofUtah

 

PaperpreparedforDasArgument

TheRiseofChina?

Chinaisnowemergingasamajorplayerinthecapitalistworldeconomy.Intermofpurchasingpowerparity,Chinaisnowalreadythesecondlargesteconomyintheworld,behindtheUnitedStates.In2002,Chinaaccountedfor17.5percentoftheworldeconomicgrowthand60percentoftheworldexportsgrowth.Chinaissaidtobecometheworkshopoftheworld,themajorplatformofworldmanufacturingexportsinthe21stcentury.

China’srisingimportanceinthecapitalistworldeconomyraisesseveralinteresting,importantquestions.First,thereisthequestionhowChina’sinternalsocialstructureislikelytobetransformedasChinaassumesdifferentpositionsintheexistingworldsystem.Accordingtoonepointofview,asChinaplaysanincreasinglyactiveroleinthecapitalistworldeconomy,Chinaislikelytobecomeincreasingly“modernized”and“developed,”anditisonlyamatteroftimeChinabecomesastable,materiallyabundant,andoverwhelmingly“middleclass”society.

Forexample,between1999-2001,aspecialresearchgroupoftheChineseAcademyofSocialSciences,underthedirectinstructionofthehighestleadershipoftheChineseCommunistParty,conductedaresearchonthe“evolutionofthecontemporarysocialstructure”inChina.Theresearchgrouppredictsthat“asChinaexperiencesindustrialization,informationalization,andurbanization,themiddlestratawillkeepgrowing,andeventuallybecomethemostimportant,moststabilizingsocialforceswithinthemodernizedChinesestructureofsocialstrata.”(CASS2001and2002)

Secondly,thereisthequestionifChinais“rising,”thatis,ifitismovingupwardswithinthehierarchyoftheexistingworldsystem,howwillotherperipheralorsemi-peripheralcountriesbeaffected?

Onthisquestion,thesizeofChinaisofparticularimportance.Thecapitalistworldsystemisanunequal,hierarchicalsysteminwhichwealthandpowerhavealwaysbeenconcentratedonthetop.Giventhestructureoftheexistingworldsystem,theriseofChina,givenChina’senormoussize,cannotbuthavetohaveseriousimplicationsforotherperipheralandsemi-peripheralcountries?

Thirdly,thereisthequestionwhetherChinawillbecomethenexthegemonicpower.Ifthe20thcenturywassaidtobethe“AmericanCentury,”willthe21stcenturyturnouttobethe“CenturyofChina”?

InChaosandGovernanceintheModernWorldSystem(1999),GiovanniArrighiplacesmuchhopeontherenaissanceoftheChinesecivilization.ArrighihopesthatthereemergingChina-centeredcivilizationwouldprovidesystem-levelsolutionstothesystem-levelproblemsleftbehindbytheU.S.hegemonyandleadthetransformationofthemodernworldintoacommonwealthofcivilizations.

Fourthly,thereisthemorefundamentalquestion.Howwilltheunderlyingdynamicsoftheexistingworldsystemitself–thecapitalistworldeconomy–beaffected?

ImmanuelWallersteinhasarguedthattheexistingworldsystemhasenteredintoastructuralcrisis.Asthesystemdeveloped,severalseculartrendsemergedandhavenowreachedasymptotes,exhaustingthesystem’sabilityofself-adjustment.Wearenowinanageoftransition,attheendofwhichtheexistingsystemshouldbereplacedbyoneorseveralothersystems.Whataretheimplicationsofthe“riseofChina”intheageoftransition?

Howdoesthe“riseofChina”playapartinthetransition,andinthestructuralcrisis?

ChinaintheCapitalistWorldSystem

WhereisChinaplacedinthecapitalistworldeconomy?

China’spositionisreflectedbyitspositionintheglobalcommoditychainsaswellasitsclassstructure.

Letusconsideroneexampleofglobalcommoditychain.Table1reportstheglobaldistributionofvalueaddedineachstageofproductionanddistributionofamodelofglobeforchildren’sstudymadeinChinatobesoldintheU.S.markets.Inthisexample,China,aperipheralstate,receives10.5percentofthetotalvalueadded.HongKong,ageographicareathatarguablyhasasemi-peripheralpositionintheworldsystem,receives26.3percentofthetotalvalueadded.TheU.S.,thehegemoniccorestateintheworldsystem,receives63.2percentofthetotalvalueadded.Similarly,AndyXie,theMorganStanleychiefeconomistonAsia,estimatesthatforeachU.S.dollarinvalueforaproductthatChinaexportstotheU.S.,businessesinHongKongorTaiwantake20cents,andU.S.brandownersanddistributorsreceivethebulkofthebenefitsastheproductsellsfor4-5U.S.dollarsattheretaillevelintheU.S.(Xie2003).

Thevaluedistributionintheseexamplesisconsistentwithwhatisgenerallyobservedinglobalcommoditychains.Generally,thecorestatesreceivethelion’sshare,andtheperipheralandthesemi-peripheralstatesreceivethesmallersharesofthemarketvaluegeneratedintheglobalcommoditychains.

Intermoftheclassstructure,Chinahasarelativelylowlevelofproletarianization.TheChineseworkingclassesarepoliticalandeconomicallylesseffectivelyorganized,withrelativelylowerbargainingpower.Table2comparestheclassstructureforstateswithdifferentpositionsinthecapitalistworldsystem.

Inadditiontothewell-understoodbourgeoisieandpettybourgeoisie,theotherclassesaredefinedasfollows:

The“MiddleClass”:

Highlyskilled“professionals,technicians,andmanagers”have,toacertaindegree,monopolisticcontroloverthesupplyoftheirlaborpowerandtheirlaborisgenerallydifficulttomonitor.Theyperformeconomicandsocialfunctionsthatareofstrategicimportancetothecapitalistsystem.Tosecuretheirloyalty,thecapitalistshavetopaytheseworkersa“loyaltyrent,”sothattheirincomesaresignificantlyhigherthanthoseofotherworkers.Totheextenttheseworkerslivearelativelyprivilegedmateriallife,theyconstitutethe“middleclass”betweenthecapitalistclassandotherworkingclasses.

Proletariat:

Thefullyproletarianizedwageworkersaretheskilledandsemi-skilledworkersintheurbansector,whousuallyhavefull-timejobsinthe“formalsector.”Theirmoneyincomesentirelyoralmostentirelyderivefromwagelabor.

TheSemi-Proletariat:

Theunskilledwageworkersintheurbansector,whousuallyhavepart-timeorinsecurejobsandarefrequentlyunemployed,belongtothesemi-proletariat.Theirwageincomesarenotsufficienttomeettheiressentialneedsandtheyhavetoengageinpettymarkettransactionsorpettycommodityproduction,orworkinthe“informalsector”tosupplementtheirmoneyincomes.Intheperipheryandthesemi-periphery,manysemi-proletarianworkersare“migrantworkers”whospendpartoftheirlifetimeintheurbanareaandtherestoftheirlifetimeintheruralarea.Asubstantialpartoftheirrealincomescomefromruralfamilyproduction.

ThePeasants:

Theagriculturalpettycommodityproducerslivinginruralareasareknownasthe“peasants.”Intheperipheryandthesemi-periphery,peasantsandsemi-proletarianwageworkersoftenbelongtothesamehouseholds.Manysemi-proletarianworkersliveaspeasantsduringpartoftheirlifetime,andviceversa.Inthecontextoftheperipheryandthesemi-periphery,thepeasantsmaybeseenas“semi-proletarians”totheextenttheyfunctionastheruralreservearmyfortheurbanunskilledwageworkers.

WhatislikelytohappenasChinabecomestheworld’sworkshop?

Wearelikelytoobservethelargestproletarianizationtheworldhaseverseen.China’sclassstructurewillbefundamentallytransformed.Theshareoftheproletarianandsemi-proletarianwageworkersinthetotalpopulationwillbesubstantiallyincreased.Withinoneortwogenerations,China’sdegreeofproletarianizationmayreachthecurrentlevelinLatinAmericanandSoutheastAsiansemi-peripheralstates.Asaresult,theChineseproletarianandsemi-proletarianworkerswilldemandtohavethesemi-peripherallevelofwagesandthecorrespondingpoliticalandsocialrights.Thedemandandtheincreasedbargainingpoweroftheproletariatandthesemi-proletariatwillimposegreatpressuresonChina’sregimeofcapitalaccumulation.Tosurvivesuchpressures,Chinamustestablishitselfasastableandsecuresemi-peripheralstateintheworldsystem.Isthislikelytohappen?

Onecanimagineseveralpossiblescenarios.

ThePeripheralizationoftheSemi-Periphery

Forthecapitalistworldeconomy,theproblemofChinalieswithitshugesize.Chinahasalaborforcethatislargerthanthetotallaborforceinallofthecorestates,orthatintheentiresemi-periphery.IfChinabecomesafullyestablishedsemi-peripheralstate,competingwiththeexistingsemi-peripheralstatesinalloftheexistingsemi-peripheralcommoditychainsorlinkswithincommoditychains,thecompetitioneventuallymustleadtotheconvergencebetweenChinaandtheexistingsemi-peripheralstatesinprofitratesandwagerates.GivenChina’senormouslaborforce,itisquitepossibleChina’scompetitionwillcompletelyunderminetherelativemonopolyoftheexistingsemi-peripheralstatesincertaincommoditychains,forcingthetraditionalsemi-peripheralstatestoacceptlowerwageratesthatareclosetotheChinesewagerates.

Ifthisscenarioismaterialized,theresultwillbethefurtherpolarizationofthecapitalistworldsystem,betweenasmall,highlyprivilegedandwealthycore,andalargenumberofperipheralstateswithmoreorlesssimilarlevelsofincomeandsocialstructuresthatcomprisetheoverwhelmingmajorityoftheworldpopulation.Undersuchascenario,seriousproblemsarelikelytoarise.First,the

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > PPT模板 > 商务科技

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1